Salmon patty EPA and DHA bioavailability . . .
Table 3—Mean area under the curve (AUCfasting-9 h) plasma
concentrations of EPA, DHA, and EPA + DHA according to
treatment
tial criticism of the study, but this did not likely affect the results.
The risk with nonrandom assignment would be a carry-over effect
between treatment phases, indicated by a rising baseline as the
study progresses. There was no increase in baseline values over
time, suggesting that the washout period between treatments was
sufficient. All randomized subjects were evaluated for safety, and
the 10 subjects who completed all treatment clinic visits were eval-
uated for efficacy.
Unfortified
salmon patties
(control)
Fortified
salmon
patties
Vegetable
patties
+ capsules
EPA, g·h/mL
DHA, g·h/mL
12.9 6.5
40.8 23.6
37.6 24.4a
103.7 77.0a
5.9 11.2a
7.4 12.1a
EPA + DHA, g·h/mL 53.7 29.1 141.2 101.2a 13.4 23.1a
Subjects were predominantly Caucasian (8 [72.7%]). Three
(27.3%) of the 11 subjects were black. Gender distribution was ap-
proximately equal: 5 (45.5%) subjects were male, and 6 (54.5%) were
female, and the group had a mean age of 58.3 y. Because only one
subject (black female, 53 y of age) dropped from the study, demo-
graphic characteristics of the 10 subjects who completed were similar
to all subjects. Of the completed subjects, 80% and 20% were Cauca-
sian or black, respectively. There was equal male and female distri-
bution among this group, and the mean age was 58.8 y.
a
Superscripts in a row denote a statistically significant difference from the
unfortified salmon patties (control) group by pairwise comparisons using the
Dunnett’s procedure (p < 0.05).
Assessments
The primary efficacy variable was the bioavailability of n-3 fatty
acids (EPA and DHA), measured as the mean area under the curve
(AUC) for triglyceride EPA and DHA in blood samples collected pri-
or to consumption of study products (average of values obtained
from measurements conducted on samples collected at –0.5 and 0
h) and at 1, 2, 4, 6, and 9 h following consumption of the low-fat
meal plus study products.
Incremental area under the curve
Results of the mean AUCfasting-9 h EPA and DHA analyses are
shown in Table 3. Pairwise comparisons utilizing Dunnett’s proce-
dure indicated that consumption of the fortified patties resulted in
significantly higher plasma concentrations of EPA than consump-
tion of the unfortified patties (p = 0.017). Additionally, consumption
of the unfortified patties resulted in significantly higher concentra-
tions of EPA than did the vegetable patties plus the capsules
(p = 0.013). According to pairwise comparisons, the vegetable pat-
ties plus capsules produced significantly lower DHA concentrations
than the unfortified patties (p < 0.001). The difference between
fortified and unfortified patty responses was also significant
(p = 0.035). Vegetable patties plus capsules were found to produce
significantly lower plasma EPA + DHA concentrations than the
unfortified patties (p = 0.003), and the difference between fortified
and unfortified patties in the EPA + DHA mean AUCfasting-9 h concen-
trations was also statistically significant (p = 0.031).
Because of differences in doses between groups, a direct com-
parison of the bioavailability of the n-3 fatty acids in the various
treatments was not possible. However, qualitative evaluation is
possible by looking at the proportionality of n-3 fatty acids con-
sumed relative to the AUCfasting-9 h, which was 4.0 for the capsules
compared to the unfortified patties, 10.5 for the capsules compared
to the fortified patties, and 2.6 for the unfortified patties compared
to the fortified patties. We would expect the AUCfasting-9 h to be
roughly proportional to the dose consumed, with the AUCfasting-9 h
smallest with the capsules, larger with the unfortified patties and
the largest with the fortified patties, which was in fact what we saw.
For DHA, there was an approximate 5-fold increase in the AUCfasting-
EPA and DHA were measured in triglycerides, as described by
Subbaiah and others (1993). Following lipid extraction, triglycerides
were separated on silica gel TLC plates with the solvent system of
hexane: diethyl ether: acetic acid (70: 30: 1, v/v), and the spot cor-
responding to standard triolein was scraped from the plate after
spraying the plate with 0.1% dichlorofluorescein in 95% ethanol.
Fatty acid methyl esters were prepared with the BF3-methanol re-
agent (Supelco, Bellefonte, Pa., U.S.A.) and were analyzed on a
Shimadzu GC-9 chromatograph (Shimadzu Scientific Instruments
Inc., Columbia, Md., U.S.A.) equipped with a SupelcoWax 10 fused-
silica column (Supelco Inc., Bellefonte, Pa., U.S.A.). The tempera-
ture of the oven was initially 172 °C for 8 min, and was raised at a
rate of 6 °C per min to a final temperature of 220 °C, which was
maintained for 20 min. Peaks were identified by comparing with
retention times of standards. The concentrations of DHA and EPA
were calculated with reference to a 17:0 internal standard.
Safety and tolerability were assessed by monitoring adverse
events reported by subjects at each clinic visit. Additionally, vital
signs (blood pressure and pulse) and body weight were measured
at each clinic visit.
Statistical methods
The per-protocol population, including all subjects who complet-
ed the full length of the study, was utilized for efficacy analyses. An
analysis of variance model was generated to compare the incremen-
tal areas under the curve (fasting [average of values at –0.5 and 0
h] to 9 h), hereafter denoted as mean AUCfasting-9 h of triglyceride
EPA and DHA among the 3 treatment phases. Post-hoc pairwise
comparisons were conducted utilizing Dunnett’s procedure.
The safety population included all subjects who entered the
study, had at least 1 treatment clinic visit, and received 1 dose of
study product. Possible differences in the incidence of adverse
events were assessed with the Fisher’s exact test.
for the unfortified patties compared to the capsules, and an
9 h
additional 2.5-fold increase for the fortified compared to the unfor-
tified patties. For EPA, these increases were about 2-fold and 3-fold,
and for the total EPA + DHA increase in responses were approxi-
mately 4-fold and 2.5-fold. These results demonstrate that the fish
oil n-3 fatty acids were biologically available when incorporated
into salmon patties.
As mentioned, the current study did not allow a direct compar-
ison of the bioavailability of n-3 fatty acids from fortified salmon
patties as compared to a fish oil capsule, but another recent study
examined the bioavailability of n-3 fatty acids from foods enriched
Results and Discussion
Subjects
Eleven subjects were randomized to this sequential treatment with microencapsulated fish oil compared with n-3 fatty acids in a
study, of which 10 (90.9%) completed. One subject withdrew from capsule (Wallace and others 2000). Analyses of platelet fatty acid
the study (withdrew consent) after the 2nd treatment clinic visit. composition following 4 wk of intervention indicated no significant
All subjects followed the same treatment sequence (unfortified: difference in the bioavailability of n-3 fatty acids from foods as
fortifed: vegetable-patties plus capsules), which could be a poten- compared to capsules.
Vol. 68, Nr. 3, 2003—JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE 763