G. Ceyhan et al. / Spectrochimica Acta Part A 81 (2011) 184–198
185
–HC(CH ) ). 13C NMR (DMSO-d6 as solvent, ı in ppm): ı 169.0
cyclohexane as substrate. Thermal properties of the metal com-
plexes were investigated in the 20–1000 C temperature range.
3
2
◦
(CH N), 115.0–145.0 (Ar–C), 24,09 (CH), 40,75 (t-CH ), 40.54 (qua-
3
ternary C), 34.6 (–CH), 21.5 (–CH ). Mass spectrum (LC/MS APCI):
3
m/z 599 [M]+ (10%), 466 [M−144] (100%), 430 [M+2] (30%).
+
+2
2
. Experimental
UV–vis (ꢀmax, nm, DMF as solvent): 213, 277, 381, 386, 392, 394,
97. FT-IR (KBr, cm ): 3430 ꢁ(OH), 2998, 2892 ꢁ(CH2)alph, 1624
−
1
3
2
.1. General
ꢁ
(CH N), 1274 ꢁ(C–OH).
HL : Elemental analyses, found (calcd. %): C, 78.15 (78.39), H
.74 (9.21), N 4.90 (4.78). HNMR (CDCl , ( ppm): 9.80–10.10 (4, 3H,
2
The metal salts CuCl ·2H O, CoCl ·6H O, NiCl ·6H O,
2
2
2
2
2
2
1
9
3
RuCl ·3H O, Pd(AcO) and organic substances were purchased
3
2
2
OH), 8.60 (s, 2H, CH N), 7.40–8.20 (m, 6H, Ar–H), 1.13–1.64 (s, 27H,
–
from commercial sources and used as received, unless noted
otherwise. The Bu NBF compound was obtained from Fluka. Ele-
13
C(CH ) ). C NMR (CDCl , ı ppm) 169.00 (CH N), 115.00–145.00
3 3 3
4
4
(Ar–C), 40,77 (t-CH ), 40.56 (quaternary C). Mass spectrum (LC/MS
3
+
mental analyses (C, H and N) were performed using a LECO CHNS
9
metal complexes were obtained using KBr discs (4000–400 cm
with a Perkin Elmer spectrum 400 FT-IR spectrophotometer. FAR
spectra of the complexes were recorded using a Perkin Elmer
spectrum 400 FT-IR/FT-FAR instrument. The electronic spectra
were obtained in the 200–900 nm range by a Perkin Elmer Lambda
+
APCI): m/z 613 [M] (15%), 412 [M−201] (100%). UV–vis (ꢀmax,
32 elemental analyser. Infrared spectra of the ligands and their
−
1
nm, DMF as solvent): 201, 203, 217, 221, 402. FT-IR (KBr, cm ):
−
1
)
3
1
450 ꢁ(OH), 2975–2900 ꢁ(C–H)alph, 2875 ꢁ(C–H), 1643 ꢁ(C N),
290 ꢁ(C–OH), 750 ꢁ(C–H).
2
.3. Preparation of the Cu(II), Co(II), Ni(II) and Ru(III) complexes
4
5 spectrophotometer. Magnetic measurements were carried
Copper(II), cobalt(II), nickel(II) and ruthenium(III) complexes
out by the Gouy method using Hg[Co(SCN) ] as a calibrant. Mass
4
were obtained according to a general procedure: CuCl ·2H O
2
2
spectra of the ligands were recorded on a LC/MS APCI AGILENT
(
2 mmol, 0.241 g) was dissolved in ethanol and stirred under reflux
100 MSD spectrophotometer. 1H and
13
C NMR spectra were
1
for 30 min, followed by the addition of the Schiff base (1 mmol;
recorded on a Bruker 400 MHz instrument. TMS was used as
internal standard and CDCl3 as solvent. The thermal analyses
studies of the complexes were performed on a Perkin Elmer Pyris
Diamond DTA/TG Thermal System under nitrogen atmosphere at
1
2
0
.599 g for HL and 0.613 g for HL ) in ethanol and the reaction mix-
ture stirred upon heating for 24 h. The obtained complexes were
filtered, washed with methanol and dried in a vacuum desiccator
over CaCl2.
◦
a heating rate of 10 C/min.
Analytical and spectroscopic data of the metal complexes are
Cyclic voltammograms were recorded on an Iviumstat Electro-
chemical workstation equipped with a low current module (BAS
PA-1) recorder. The electrochemical cell was equipped with a BAS
glassy carbon working electrode (area 4.6 mm ), a platinum coil
auxiliary electrode and an Ag /AgCl reference electrode filled with
given below:
1
Co (L )(Cl) ·4H O: Elemental analyses, found (calcd. %): C 56.47
2
3
2
(
56.98), H 6.40 (6.50), N 2.41 (2.20). UV–vis (ꢀmax, nm, DMF as
solvent): 281, 327, 381, 410, 576. FT-IR (KBr, cm ): 3475 ꢁ(OH),
2
−
1
+
2
ꢁ
950–2800 ꢁ(C–H), 2850 ꢁ(C–H), 1650 ꢁ(C N), 1365 ꢁ(C–O), 950
(C–H), 540 ꢁ(M–O), 475 ꢁ(M–N). ꢂeff B.M. (298 K): 4.28 (for per
tetrabutylammonium tetrafluoroborate (0.1 M) in CH CN and DMF
3
solvents and adjusted to 0.00 V vs. SCE. Cyclic voltammetric mea-
surements were carried out at room temperature in an undivided
cell (BAS model C-3 cell stand) with a platinum counter elec-
trode and an Ag /AgCl reference electrode (BAS). All potentials
are reported with respect to Ag /AgCl. The solutions were deoxy-
metal).
Cu (L )(Cl) ·5H O: Elemental analyses, found (calcd. %): C 56.36
1
2
3
2
(
56.35), H 6.04 (6.43), N 3.29 (3.37). UV–vis (ꢀmax, nm, DMF as sol-
+
−
1
vent): 217, 236, 278, 280, 313, 410. FT-IR (KBr, cm ): 3452 ꢁ(OH),
+
2
8
960–2930 ꢁ(C–H)alph, 2870 ꢁ(C–H), 1629 ꢁ(C N), 1300 ꢁ(C–OH),
00 ꢁ(C–H), 575 ꢁ(M–O), 478 ꢁ(M–N). ꢂeff B.M. (298 K): 1.88 (for
genated by passing dry nitrogen through the solution for 30 min
prior to the experiments during the experiments.
per metal).
The microwave experiments were carried out using a Berghof
MWS3+ equipped with pressure and temperature control.
Microwave experiments were done in closed DAP 60 vessels. The
reaction products were characterized and analyzed by Perkin Elmer
Clarus 600 GC equipped with MS dedector fitted with Elite-5 MS
and FID detectors with BPX5 capillary columns.
1
Ni (L )(Cl) ·3H O: Elemental analyses, found (calcd. %): C 56.47
2
3
2
(
57.01), H 6.49 (6.50), N 3.33 (3.41). UV–vis (ꢀmax, nm, DMF as sol-
vent): 214, 220, 237, 265, 268, 401, 494, 598. FT-IR (KBr, cm ):
−
1
3
ꢁ
431 ꢁ(OH), 2966 ꢁ(C–H)alph, 2877 ꢁ(C–H), 1649 ꢁ(C N), 1350
(C–OH), 887 ꢁ(C–H), 574 ꢁ(M–O), 472 ꢁ(M–N). ꢂeff B.M. (298 K):
diamagnetic.
1
Ru(L )(Cl) ·6H O: Elemental analyses, found (calcd. %): C 59.00
2
2
2
.2. Preparation of the ligands (HL1 and HL2)
(59.06), H 6.75 (6.78), N 3.60 (3.62). UV–vis (ꢀmax, nm, DMF as sol-
vent): 201, 212, 217, 206, 209, 214, 399. FT-IR (KBr, cm ): 3452
−
1
The amine compound, 2,6-di-tert-butyl-4-hydroxy aniline, and
ꢁ(OH), 2966 ꢁ(C–H)alph, 2870 ꢁ(C–H), 1643 ꢁ(C N), 1300 ꢁ(C–O),
two carbonyl compounds (2,6-di-formyl-4-isopropyl phenol (A)
and 2,6-di-formyl-4-tert-butyl phenol (B)) were synthesized to
the reported methods [22,23]. The carbonyl compounds (1 mmol,
846 ꢁ(C–H), 532 ꢁ(M–O), 472 ꢁ(M–N). ꢂ B.M. (298 K): 1.74.
eff
1
Pd (L )(AcO) ·4H O: Elemental analyses, found (calcd. %): C
2
3
2
51.05 (50.99), H 6.60 (6.66), N 2.70 (2.64). UV–vis (ꢀmax, nm, DMF as
−
1
0.192 g for A and 0.206 g for B) in ethanol (20 mL, absolute) and
solvent): 214, 218, 220, 226, 232, 236, 252, 418. FT-IR (KBr, cm ):
3439 ꢁ(OH), 2945 ꢁ(C–H)alph, 2870 ꢁ(C–H), 1622 ꢁ(C N), 1350
ꢁ(C–O), 812 ꢁ(C–H), 552 ꢁ(M–O), 455 ꢁ(M–N). ꢂeff B.M. (298 K):
diamagnetic.
amine compound (2 mmol, 0.443 g) in ethanol (20 mL) were mixed
◦
and refluxed for about 4 h at 80 C. The color of the solution changed
to light yellow. After cooling the solution, the resulting precipi-
tate was filtered, and washed with cold ethanol. The ligands were
recrystallized from ethanol.
2
Co (L )(Cl) ·4H O: Elemental analyses, found (calcd. %): C 56.64
2
3
2
(57.46), H 6.62 (6.63), N 3.30 (3.35). UV–vis (ꢀmax, nm, DMF as sol-
−
1
Analytical and spectroscopic data of the Schiff base ligands are
given below:
vent): 201, 218, 220, 226, 228, 233, 268, 390, 400. FT-IR (KBr, cm ):
3441 ꢁ(OH), 2972 ꢁ(C–H)alph, 2875 ꢁ(C–H), 1647 ꢁ(C N), 1400
ꢁ(C–O), 827 ꢁ(C–H), 540 ꢁ(M–O), 467 ꢁ(M–N). ꢂeff B.M. (298 K):
4.19 (for per metal).
1
HL : Elemental analyses, found (calcd. %): C, 78.76 (78.22); H,
9
9
2
.29 (9.19); N, 4.33 (4.68). 1H NMR (CDCl3 as solvent, ı in ppm):
.90–10.50 (s, 3H, OH), 8.60 (s, 2H, CH N), 7.0–8.0 (m, 6H, Ar–H),
.40 (m, 1H, –CH), 1.10–1.70 (m, 18H, –C(CH ) ), 1.60 (d, 6H,
2
Cu (L )(Cl) ·4H O: Elemental analyses, found (calcd. %): C 56.05
2
3
2
(56.83), H 6.90 (6.54), N 3.39 (3.31). UV–vis (ꢀmax, nm, DMF as
3
3