Table 1 Hydrogenation of olefins—comparison of catalysts
Product distribution (mol%)
Substrate
(mass/g)
Reaction
time/h
Residual H2
pressure/bar
Conv. TOF/
(%)
cis-
Hex-2-ene
trans-
Hex-2-ene
Catalyst
Solvent
h21
n-Hexane
Hex-1-ene
( ≈ 50 g)
Pd6Ru6/MCM-41
Cu4Ru12/MCM-41
Ru6/MCM-41
—
—
—
4
4
4
24
4
24
24
1
8
99
56
13
19
6
4954
2805
325
277
250
196
—
68
51
14
10
6
22
30
42
36
45
33
32
9
19
45
53
48
63
67
15
13
18
16
17
Pd/MCM-41
No Catalyst
—
—
14
7
5
—
cis-
trans-
n-Dodecane Dodec-2-ene
Dodec-2-ene
Dodec-1-ene
( ≈ 50 g)
Pd6Ru6/MCM-41
Cu4Ru12/MCM-41
—
—
4
4
3
7
88
35
2202
877
63
54
29
32
7
13
trans-
cis-Decalin Decalin
Others
Naphthalene
( ≈ 8 g)
Pd6Ru6/MCM-41
Cu4Ru12/MCM-41
CH3CN
8
8
8
8
8
12
10
20
18
20
19
7
0
0.8
0
50
19
86
50
4
34
9
15
Hexadecane
Hexadecanea
CH3CN
No Reaction
—
No Reaction
2
—
100
Hexadecane
a
Reaction conditions: catalyst = 20 mg; T = 373 K; starting H2 pressure = 20 bar; solvent ≈ 55 g; 200 ppm of sulfur was added in the form of
benzothiophene.
black; the IR carbonyl stretching region gradually disappeared;
and the atomic structure of the mixed-metal cluster, as seen by
details of the XANES and EXAFS, changed dramatically (Fig.
1). High-resolution transmission electron microscopy
(HRTEM) revealed15 that the Pd–Ru bimetallic nanoparticles
were of uniform size (ca. 17 Å diameter) and spatially well
distributed within the pores of the siliceous support.
computations, we have arrived at the EXAFS model for the
structure of the bimetallic cage shown in Fig. 2.
We thank Professor C. R. A. Catlow for invaluable
assistance. We also thank the EPSRC for a rolling grant to
J. M. T., a ROPA award funding S. B. and a regular one to
B. F. G. J., the Commissioners of the 1851 Royal Exhibition for
an award to R. R., the European Commission for a grant to S. H.,
and the Royal Society and Peterhouse for a Research Fellow-
ship to D. S. S. G. S. was funded partly by J. M. T.’s rolling
grant and the CCRL Daresbury Laboratory, to whom we are
grateful.
The catalytic performance in alkene hydrogenation of the Pd–
Ru nanoparticles is compared in Table 1 with those of similarly
prepared (and sized) Cu4Ru12 bimetallic nanoparticles. The
kinetics of hydrogenation of hex-1-ene and dodec-1-ene reveal
that the Pd6Ru6 catalysts showed a higher selectivity for n-
hexane (or n-dodecane) than Cu4Ru12. The Pd6Ru6 catalyst is
more active than Cu4Ru12 for the hydrogenation of hex-1-ene
( ≈ 2 times) and dodec-1-ene ( ≈ 2.5 times). For comparison, a
monometallic Ru6 cluster was encapsulated in MCM-41 and a
Pd/MCM-41 catalyst was prepared following a literature
procedure,16 and both were tested for the hydrogenation of hex-
1-ene employing the same reaction conditions. It is very clear
from Table 1 that the bimetallic catalysts are far superior in
performance (% conversion) than their monometallic analogues
and more importantly yield a higher selectivity for hydro-
genated products, suggesting a possible synergism between the
two bimetallic nanoparticles. The Pd6Ru6 catalyst was more
effective than Cu4Ru12 in the hydrogenation of naphthalene and
higher conversions were obtained when acetonitrile was used as
a solvent. Other solvents such as hexadecane showed a lower
preference for the production of cis-decalin. The solid catalyst
may be recycled without any significant decrease in activity or
selectivity. This was done by filtering off the solvent–product
mixture and recharging the Parr reactor with fresh material17
(see Table 1 for reaction conditions). Unsurprisingly,1–3 the
introduction of ≈ 200 ppm of sulfur in the reaction mixture
completely poisons the catalyst.
Notes and references
1 J. H. Sinfelt, Int. Rev. Phys. Chem., 1988, 7, 281.
2 C. N. Satterfield, Heterogeneous Catalysis in Industrial Practice, 2nd
edn., McGraw Hill, New York, 1991.
3 J. M. Thomas and W. J. Thomas, Principles and Practice of
Heterogeneous Catalysis, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 1997.
4 M. S. Nasher, A. I. Frenkel, D. L. Adler, J. R. Shapley and R. G. Nuzzo,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997, 119, 7760.
5 M. Ichikawa, Adv. Catal., 1992, 38, 283.
6 B. C. Gates, Chem. Rev., 1995, 95, 511.
7 D. S. Shephard, T. Maschmeyer, B. F. G. Johnson, J. M. Thomas, G.
Sankar, D. Ozkaya, W. Zhou and R. D. Oldroyd, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
Engl., 1997, 36, 2242.
8 D. M. Somerville and J. R. Shapley, Catal. Lett., 1998, 52, 123.
9 D. S. Shephard, T. Maschmeyer, G. Sankar, J. M. Thomas, D. Ozkaya,
B. F. G. Johnson, R. Raja, R. D. Oldroyd and R. G. Bell, Chem. Eur. J.,
1998, 4, 1214.
10 E. Brivio, A. Ceriotti, R. D. Pergola, L. Garlaschelli, F. Domartin, M.
Marassero, M. Sansoni, P. Zanello, F. Laschi and B. T. Heaton, J. Chem.
Soc., Dalton Trans., 1994, 3237.
11 J. M. Thomas, Faraday Discuss., 1996, 105, 1.
12 T. Maschmeyer, F. Rey, G. Sankar and J. M. Thomas, Nature, 1995, 37,
159.
13 J. M. Thomas, Chem. Eur. J., 1997, 3, 1557.
14 I. J. Shannon, J. M. Thomas, G. Sankar, T. Maschmeyer, M. Sheehy, D.
Madill and R. D. Oldroyd, Catal. Lett., 1997, 44, 23.
15 D. Ozkaya, W. Zhou, J. M. Thomas, P. A. Midgeley, V. J. Keast and S.
Hermans, Catal. Lett., in press.
16 C. P. Mehnert and J. Y. Ying, Chem. Commun., 1997, 2215.
17 R. Raja and J. M. Thomas, Chem. Commun., 1998, 1841.
18 S. Bromley, C. R. A. Catlow et al., in preparation.
Surveys by electron-stimulated energy dispersive X-ray
emission17 of the Pd–Ru nanocatalyst particles after their use in
four consecutive test runs showed that there was no segregation
of the two components of the bimetallic catalyst. Moreover,
annular dark field (Z-contrast) high-resolution microscopy
showed15 that there was no evidence of coalescence or sintering
of the nanoparticles during catalytic use. Guided by energy-
minimisation procedures18 using density-functional theory
Communication 9/01263J
1572
Chem. Commun., 1999, 1571–1572