Dichlorobutene isomerization on Fe2O3
Russ.Chem.Bull., Int.Ed., Vol. 54, No. 6, June, 2005
1423
Yield of 1,4ꢀDCB (%)
70
phous to Xꢀrays (lamellas) of silica favors the reduction of
some FeIII ions to FeII, and a possible electron transfer
between them provides a high catalyst activity in redox
steps of the reaction.20
60
1
2
50
40
30
20
10
Thus, with the use of the activated silica matrix for
stabilization of iron oxide nanoparticles a more active
catalyst can be formed. Reasons for high activity of the
catalysts immobilized on silicas remain unclear. The data
of this work confirmed that chloroolefin isomerization
assuming the С—Cl bond cleavage is, most likely, a comꢀ
plex multistep process involving both oxidation—reducꢀ
tion and acid sites of the catalyst via different routes.3,7—9
Evidently, the support nature, particle size, and simultaꢀ
neous presence of two charge iron states in the catalyst are
key factors determining the optimum properties of the
catalyst.
0
40
80
120
160
200
t/min
Fig. 6. Kinetic curves of transꢀ1,4ꢀDCB accumulation at 60 °С
in the presence of the iron oxide supported on ASM (2.5 wt.% Fe,
0.005 g of catalyst, 0.6 mL of a 3,4ꢀDCB—dichloroethane (1 : 9)
mixture) (1) and KSKꢀ2 (3 wt.% Fe, 0.004 g of catalyst, 0.6 mL
of a 3,4ꢀDCB—dichloroethane (1 : 9) mixture) (2).
The authors are grateful to P. A. Chernavskii for synꢀ
thesis of the catalysts by temperatureꢀprogrammed reducꢀ
tion and to G. V. Murav´eva for their Xꢀray diffraction
study.
Table 4. Maximum isomerization rate (V ) and specific catalytic
activity (Asp) of iron oxide immobilized on the ASM in the
isomerization of 3,4ꢀDCB at different temperatures
This work was financially supported by the Russian
Foundation for Basic Research (Project Nos 01ꢀ03ꢀ32783,
03ꢀ03ꢀ33104, and 03ꢀ03ꢀ32029).
T/°С
V/mol L–1 h–1
Asp
/mole of 1,4ꢀDCB (mol Fe)–1 h–1
60
70
80
0.68
1.05
1.73
180
280
470
References
1. H. Hayashi, L. Z. Chen, T. Tago, M. Kishida, and
K. Wakabayshi, Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 2002, 231, 81.
2. C. Kurts, Y. Arita, W. Weiss, W. Ranke, and R. Schlögl,
Topics in Catal., 2001, 14, 111.
3. T. N. Rostovshchikova, O. I. Kiseleva, G. Yu. Yurkov, S. P.
Gubin, D. A. Pankratov, Yu. D. Perfil´ev, V. V. Smirnov,
P. A. Chernavskii, and G. V. Pankina, Vestn. Mosk. Gos.
Univ., Ser. 2. Khim., 2001, 42, 318 [Vestn. Mosk. Univ., Ser.
Khim., 2001, 42 (Engl. Transl.)].
4. M. V. Tsodikov, Ya. R. Katsobashvili, E. V. Slivinskii, Yu. V.
Maksimov, V. V. Matveev, I. P. Suzdalev, O. G. Ellert, and
G. F. Ivanova, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR. Ser. Khim., 1986,
2666 [Bull. Acad. Sci. USSR, Div. Chem. Sci., 1986, 35, 2443
(Engl. Transl.)].
5. Yu. V. Maksimov, M. V. Tsodikov, M. A. Perederii, I. P.
Suzdalev, A. I. Nekhaev, V. T. Popov, and O. V. Bukhtenko,
Izv. Akad. Nauk. Ser. Khim., 1997, 86 [Russ. Chem. Bull.,
1997, 46, 81 (Engl. Transl.)].
6. P. A. Chernavskii, V. V. Kiselev, and V. V. Lunin, Zh. Fiz.
Khim., 1992, 66, 2712 [Russ. J. Phys. Chem., 1992, 66 (Engl.
Transl.)].
7. T. N. Rostovshchikova, V. V. Smirnov, and A. I. Kokorin,
J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 1998, 129, 141.
8. T. N. Rostovshchikova, V. V. Smirnov, and E. N.
Golubeva, Khim. Fiz. [Chemical Physics], 1998, 17, 63 (in
Russian).
9. L. I. Trakhtenberg, G. N. Gerasimov, V. K. Potapov, T. N.
Rostovshchikova, V. V. Smirnov, and V. Yu. Zufman, Vestn.
Mosk. Gos. Univ., Ser. 2. Khim., 2001, 42, 325 [Vestn. Mosk.
Univ., Ser. Khim., 2001, 42 (Engl. Transl.)].
with the results for the catalysts on silica gel (see Fig. 4)
shows that even at a lower temperature (80 °С) the
ASMꢀsupported catalyst is approximately twofold more
active than the most efficient catalyst on KSKꢀ2 as a
carrier with the 15% iron content. The rate constants of
the forward and backward reactions, which were estiꢀ
mated from the kinetic data, in the presence of iron oxide
on the ASM at 90 °С were 5.7•10–4 and 2.1•10–4 s–1
,
respectively. These values approximately twofold exceed
the isomerization rate constants obtained for the catalysts
with the optimum composition prepared using a KSK
support (see Table 3).
The ASMꢀimmobilized iron oxide is also superior to
the catalyst obtained using KSKꢀ2 by stability to reducꢀ
tion. As can be seen from the data in Table 1, after the
ASMꢀsupported iron oxide was used in isomerization (on
heating the reaction mixture for several hours at 80 °С),
the Mössbauer spectra retain signals from the FeIII and
FeII ions. The parameters of these signals are close to
those observed for the starting sample, and the relative
fraction of the reduced form increases approximately twoꢀ
fold in the spent catalyst. An enhanced stability of the
ASMꢀimmobilized FeIII oxide to complete reduction
compared to the iron oxides on KSKꢀ2 is related, probꢀ
ably, to the strong interaction of the metal ion with layer
silica. The presence of structural defects in particles amorꢀ