Please do not adjust margins
ChemComm
Page 4 of 5
DOI: 10.1039/C5CC06828B
COMMUNICATION
Journal Name
cycloalkanes and alkanes (Fig. S10b). A variety of lignin-derived
In summary, we have developed a new and simple route for
phenolic monomers and dimers were quantitatively converted to directly producing C3-C17 hydrocarbons from cellulolytic enzyme
cyclic alkanes over Ni/ASA at selected conditions, as well (Fig. S11).
lignin with the non-precious metal Ni/ASA catalyst in aploar solvent
via cascade steps in a one-pot process. These obtained naphthene
and paraffin hydrocarbons are promising precursors to be further
manufactured to clean fuels of gasoline, kerosene, diesel, as well as
aromatics chemicals. We believe that the developed highly
integrated new and efficient lignin transformation system can
provide intrinsic insights for direct liquefaction of the abundant
cellulolytic enzyme lignin, as well as inspiring thoughts in exploiting
waste lignocellulose and sulfated/alkali lignin to produce value-
added fuels and chemicals.
(a)
We gratefully acknowledge the financial support by the
Recruitment Program of Global Young Experts in China, National
Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No: 21573075),
and Shanghai Pujiang Program PJ1403500.
(b)
Notes and references
1. J. S. Luterbacher, J. M. Rand, D. M. Alonso, J. Han, J. T.
Youngquist, C. T. Maravelias, B. F. Pfleger and J. A. Dumesic,
Science, 2014, 343, 277.
2. P. Ferrini and R. Rinaldi, Angew. Chem., 2014, 53, 8559.
3. Y. Cheng, J. Jae, J. Shi, W. Fan and G. W. Huber, Angew. Chem.
,
2012, 124, 1416.
4. M. Käldström, N. Meine, C. Farès, R. Rinaldi and F. Schüth,
Green Chem., 2014, 16, 2454.
5. J. Zakzeski, P. C. A. Bruijnincx, A. L. Jongerius and B. M.
Weckhuysen, Chem. Rev., 2010, 110, 3552.
6. A. Corma, S. Iborra and A. Velty, Chem. Rev., 2007, 107, 2411.
7. A. Centeno, E. Laurent and B. Delmon, J. Catal., 1995, 154, 288.
8. Z. Luo, Y. Wang, M. He and C. Zhao, Green Chem., 2015, DOI:
10.1039/C5GC01790D.
Figure 6. a) Kinetics of lignin conversion with Ni/ASA in the apolar solvent.
Conditions: lignin (2.0 g), Ni/ASA catalyst (30.1 wt.%, 1.0 g), dodecane (80 mL),
300 °C, 6 MPa H2, stirring at 700 rpm. b) Reaction pathways in one-pot direct
conversion of lignin to a mixture of cycloalkanes.
9. N. Yan, Y. Yuan, R. Dykeman, Y. Kou and P. J. Dyson, Angew.
Chem., 2010, 49, 5549.
10. J. He, C. Zhao and J. A. Lercher, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134
20768.
,
Combining these results allowed us to depict the overall
reaction pathway for one-step conversion of cellulolytic enzyme
lignin to cycloalkanes (Fig. 6b). Under appropriate conditions, lignin
was dissolved in aploar solvent dodecane in equilibrium (k1, not
determined), which fast shifts as lignin was consumed gradually.
Subsequently, the small and uniform Ni nanoclusters supported on
ASA cleaved the exposed external C-O-C linkages of the lignin
macromolecule to form phenolic oligomers (k2, designated as the
rate of lignin conversion). The multi-steps of C-O cleavage on
phenolic oligomers follow (k3, designated as the rate of liquid yield
formation from lignin). The sequential hydrogenolysis of phenolic
dimers and trimers produces guaiacol and syringol derivatives (k4).
Followed by multi-steps of demethoxygenation, hydrogenation, and
dehydration, guaiacol and syringol derivatives were converted to
target cycloalkanes (k5). Meanwhile, the hydrogenolysis of Ph–OCH3
group produced the dominant CH4 in the gas phase. Based on the
kinetics of lignin (k2, k3) as well as of typical phenolic monomer (k5)
and dimer conversion (k4), it could be roughly estimated that the
individual reaction rates follow the order (unit: g∙g-1∙h-1): k5 (27.8) >
11. A. G. Sergeev and J. F. Hartwig, Science, 2011, 332, 439.
12. J. M. Nichols, L. M. Bishop, R. G. Bergman and J. A. Ellman, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 12554.
13. S. Son and F. D. Toste, Angew. Chem., 2010, 49, 3791.
14. A. G. Sergeev, J. D. Webb and J. F. Hartwig, J. Am. Chem. Soc.
2012, 134, 20226.
,
15. E. Laurent and B. Delmon, J. Catal., 1994, 146, 281.
16. A. Rahimi, A. Ulbrich, J. J. Coon and S. S. Stahl, Nature, 2014, 515
,
249.
17. R. Ma, W. Hao, X. Ma, Y. Tian and Y. Li, Angew. Chem., 2014, 53
,
7310.
18. C. Crestini, M. C. Caponi, D. S. Argyropoulos and R. Saladino,
Bioorg. Med. Chem., 2006, 14, 5292.
19. J. M. Pepper and H. Hibbert, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1948, 70, 67.
20. D. Meier, R. Ante and O. Faix, Bioresour. Technol., 1992, 40, 171.
21. Q. Song, F. Wang and J. Xu, Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 7019.
22. X. Wang and R. Rinaldi, Angew. Chem., 2013, 52, 11499.
23. P. Ferrini and R. Rinaldi, Angew. Chem., 2014, 53, 8634.
24. J. P. Mikkola, H. Vainio, T. Salmi, R. Sjöholm, T. Ollonqvist and J.
Väyrynen, Appl. Catal. A., 2000, 196, 143.
≫
k4 (20.6)
k2 (0.58) > k3 (0.13), suggesting that the rate-
determining step was the cleavage of phenolic oligomers.
4 | J. Name., 2015, 00, 1-3
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
Please do not adjust margins