Organic Process Research & Development 2010, 14, 466–469
In Situ FTIR Study and Scale-Up of An Enolization-Azidation Sequence†
Terrence J. Connolly,* Eric C. Hansen, and Michael F. MacEwan
Chemical DeVelopment, Wyeth Research, 401 North Middletown Road, Pearl RiVer, New York 10965, U.S.A.
Abstract:
Further processing constraints were added by Wyeth’s Chemical
Development Material Operations Group, who informed the
team that trisyl azide was more easily and economically sourced
as a 30 wt % solution in toluene than as an isolable solid.
A key step in the synthesis of an optically active aminoalcohol-
containing active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) involved the
diastereoselective introduction of an azido functional group on a
functionalized chiral oxazolidinone. This was accomplished via a
low-temperature enolization, followed by a quench with triisopro-
pylbenzenesulfonyl azide. To enable scale-up of this process, the
enolization temperature had to be increased from the original
Results and Discussion
The process initially used by Chemical Development in-
volved addition of 1 equiv of 0.5 M potassium hexamethyl-
disilazane (KHMDS) in toluene to a solution of 2 in 6.5 volumes
of THF, while the internal batch temperature was maintained
below -65 °C, followed by a solution of trisyl azide in 4
volumes of THF, then acetic acid and finally water. The high
dilution of substrate and base had a detrimental impact on
throughput in the 50-L vessel. The maximum batch size that
could be processed was approximately 2.8 kg of 2, based on
<
-65 °C to approximately -40 °C. In situ FTIR was used to study
the enolization and quench stages of the reaction. The half-life of
the enolate at -45 °C was estimated to be 12 h on the basis of in
situ FTIR profiling. Examination of the in situ FTIR data also
provided evidence that the reaction between the enolate and
triisopropylbenzenesulfonyl azide was instantaneous and demon-
strated that accumulation of triisopropylbenzenesulfonyl azide did
not occur. A combination of in situ FTIR experiments and
traditional parameter ranging experiments resulted in a process
that was successfully run at -40 °C without an appreciable erosion
of facial selectivity or yield.
Vmax being below 48 L following the acetic acid addition.
Significant improvements were made with respect to through-
put by reducing the amount of solvent to dissolve 2 from 6.5
to 2.5 volume equivalents, which still kept 2 completely in
solution even at the low temperatures required for the process,
and by the use of more concentrated 0.91 M KHMDS in THF.
These two changes along with use of a 30 wt % solution of
trisyl azide in toluene allowed the batch size to be increased to
5 kg of 2 based on a Vmax of 48 L.
With process throughput improved, efforts were then focused
on increasing the operating temperature to the -40 to -50 °C
range requested by the kilogram laboratory team. A series of
experiments were performed that addressed the operating
temperature and robustness of the process by extension of
addition times and evaluation of a series of hold times. The
results of this study are shown in Table 1.
Introduction
The evolution of a synthetic process from initial discovery
synthesis to the successful preparation of multikilogram quanti-
ties of compound 1 has been communicated previously.
Installation of the chiral center bearing the nitrogen relied on
methodology developed by Evans that involved low-temper-
ature enolization of oxazolidinone derivative 2 followed by
conversion to azido intermediate 5 with triisopropylbenzene-
sulfonyl azide (trisyl azide) and reduction (Scheme 1).
The original Discovery conditions involved performing the
enolization and trisyl azide addition sequence below -65 °C.
Although these conditions were suitable for the first Chemical
Development batch of 1, these low-temperature conditions could
not be achieved in our 50-L Hastelloy vessel. In order to allow
for heat of mixing and a slight exotherm for the reactions, the
kilolab team recommended that the process be evaluated in the
laboratory at an internal reaction temperature of ∼-40 °C.
1
2
3
This study indicated that increasing the enolization operating
temperature did not have a significant detrimental impact on
the conversion of 2 to 5 within the processing times examined,
suggesting higher temperatures were acceptable. During this
4
work, an intermediate assumed to be 4 was observed by LC.
Intermediate 4 did not decompose to 5 until acetic acid was added.
To gain insight into the kinetics of the reaction and to further
evaluate the stability of intermediates (in parallel with the
parameter ranging experiments reported above) in situ FTIR
was evaluated as a process analytical technology (PAT) method.
Several recent reports have highlighted the utility of using PAT
to gain better process understanding, and in situ FTIR has been
†
Wyeth became part of Pfizer on October 16, 2009.
*
Address correspondence to this author at the above mailing address, attention
B222/2125, or use e-mail: connolt@wyeth.com.
(
1) Alimardanov, A.; Nikitenko, A.; Connolly, T. J.; Feigelson, G.; Chan,
A. W.; Ding, Z.; Ghosh, M.; Shi, X.; Ren, J.; Hansen, E.; Farr, R.;
MacEwan, M.; Tadayon, S.; Springer, D.; Kreft, A. F.; Potoski, J. R.
Org. Process Res. DeV. 2009, 13, 1161–1168.
5-8
established as an important tool.
We established that the wavelength region between ap-
(2) Evans, D. A.; Britton, T. C.; Ellman, J. A.; Dorow, R. L. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1990, 112, 4011–4030.
-1
proximately 2200 and 1550 cm contained no interfering peaks
(
3) Safety screening performed in-house generated results in line with those
reported previously by Merck workers for triisopropylbenzenesulfonyl
azide. See: Tuma, L. D. Thermochim. Acta 1994, 243, 161–167. A review
of the thermal behavior of several sulfonyl azides is available: Bollinger,
F. W.; Tuma, L. D. Synlett 1996, 407-413.
from the solvent (THF) and the starting material 2 had a strong
-1
stretching band at 1825-1775 cm due to the oxazolidinone
carbonyl group (Figure 1). As KHMDS (0.91 M in THF) was
4
66
•
Vol. 14, No. 2, 2010 / Organic Process Research & Development
10.1021/op900299c 2010 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 01/26/2010