reduction of nitrile 9 was run for 30 min at -78 °C prior to
trapping, compound 11 in was isolated in similar yields and
optical purities. We conclude that the cyclization was
essentially complete after 10 min at -78 °C.
Reduction of 9 with lithium in ammonia gave very
different results, Scheme 4. The Li/NH3 reduction of racemic
Scheme 5. In both pathways, nitrile 9 is reduced to radical
15; radical 15 is the key branch point in each pathway. In
the alkyllithium pathway, the racemization of 15 will
compete with reduction to the alkyllithium reagent 16.
Alkyllithium reagents 16 and 16′ are configurationally stable
at -78 °C in THF,19 and the cyclizations of R-alkoxy
alkyllithium reagents have been found to take place with
retention of configuration.20 Thus, in the alkyllithium cy-
clization the ratio of 16:16′ will determine the final ratio of
11:11′.
Scheme 4. Reduction and Reductive Cyclization of Nitrile 9
An alternative view of the cyclization is that it proceeds
via a radical cyclization. On the face of it, the fact that the
cyclization of 9 is complete in 10 min at -78 °C might
suggest a radical cyclization, many of which are known to
be very rapid, over the alkyllithium cyclization. The radical
cyclization pathway is outlined in the lower half of Scheme
5. The intermediate radical 15 is again the key branch point
with cyclization and racemization reactions competing. The
cyclized radicals 19 and 19′ that are produced would then
be reduced to give alkyllithium reagents 17 and 17′. Reaction
with CO2 and esterification with diazomethane generates a
mixture of 11 and 11′. In this case the ratio 11:11′ would be
determined by competition between racemization of 15 and
cyclization of 15.
A radical clock reaction would help distinguish between
the alkyllithium and the radical cyclization pathways. Radical
15 is structurally similar to radical 2, and it should have a
comparable racemization rate at -78 °C. Radical 15 is the
only point in either mechanism where racemization would
be likely, and so the enantiomeric excess of product 11 is a
direct measure of the lifetime of the radical under the reaction
conditions. Using the optical purity of 11, 42% ee, and the
measured rate of racemization of radical 2 in eq 1 gives an
estimated lifetime for radical 15 of 2.4 × 10-7 s.21 How does
this lifetime compare with the expected rate of radical
cyclization? Extrapolating from the published Arrhenius data
for a 5-hexenyl cyclization leads to a predicted cyclization
rate of 4 × 102 at -78 °C.22 Comparing the lifetime of radical
15 and the predicted rate of cyclization suggests that the rate
of cyclization is approximately 5 orders of magnitude too
small to allow cyclization in the lifetime of the radical.
9 at -78 °C gave the uncyclized tetrahydropyran 12 in 76%
yield with none of the corresponding cyclized product 13.
Lithium ammonia reductions of nitriles proceed through
stepwise electron transfers and generally produce results
similar to those of LiDBB reductions with the same
substrates.17 Reduction of 9 with LiDBB, followed by
methanol quenching, led to 12 and 13 in a 1:10 ratio.
Oxidation of 13 with RuO4 gave the known lactone 14.18
Thus, nitrile 9 cyclizes rapidly and efficiently when reduced
with LiDBB, but it did not cyclize at all when reduced with
lithium in liquid ammonia.
One concern that might be raised with the foregoing
analysis is that the rate of cyclization was calculated from a
5-hexenyl radical but the cyclizing radical 15 is highly
substituted. Newcomb, however, has evaluated the cycliza-
tion rates of the 6,6-diphenyl-5-hexenyl radical23 and the
1-methoxy-6,6-diphenyl-5-hexenyl radical.24 The rate of
The cyclization of 9 en route to 11 can be rationalized
either as a radical cyclization or as an alkyllithium cycliza-
tion. These two mechanistic possibilities are illustrated in
(16) Ester 11 was isolated as a single diastereomer, but its relative
configuration was not determined easily. The 13C chemical shifts for both
possible diastereomers were predicted using the computational method of
Forsyth and Sebag, and the 13C data for 11 was more consistent with the
structure shown in Scheme 3. Oxidation of 13 to lactone 14 and correlation
(see ref 18) further support the assignment. Forsyth, D. A.; Sebag, A. B. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 9485-9494.
(19) Cohen, T.; Lin, M. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 1130-1131.
(20) (a) Tomooka, K.; Komine, N.; Nakai, T. Tetrahedron Lett 1997,
38, 8939-8942. (b) Woltering, M. J.; Frohlich, R.; Hoppe, D. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 1764-1766.
(21) The reviewer noted that the rate of reduction of a radical with LiDBB
can be estimated, in principle, from electrochemical data. Unfortunately,
neither the self-exchange rate nor the solvent reorganization energy for DBB
reduction has been reported. For an insightful discussion, see: (a) Andrieux,
C. P.; Gallardo, I.; Save´ant, J.-M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 1620-
1634. (b) Gonzalez, J.; Hapiot, P.; Konovalov, V.; Save´ant, J.-M. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 10171-10179.
(22) Griller, D.; Ingold, K. U. Acc. Chem. Res. 1980, 13, 317-323.
(23) Ha, C.; Horner, J. H.; Newcomb, M.; Varick, T. R.; Arnold, B. R.;
Lusztyk, J. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 1194-8.
(17) (a) Rychnovsky, S. D.; Powers, J. P.; Lepage, T. J. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1992, 114, 8375-8384. (b) Buckmelter, A. J.; Powers, J. P.;
Rychnovsky, S. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 5589-5590.
(18) Both the cis and trans isomers of lactone 14 were reported, and
NMR data for our product clearly matched the diagnostic methyl shifts for
1
the cis isomer: trans isomer H δ 0.91 ppm, 13C δ 16.06 ppm; cis isomer
1H δ 1.00 ppm, 13C δ 13.00 ppm; lactone 14 1H δ 0.99 (d, J ) 6.6 Hz)
ppm, 13C δ 12.7 ppm. However, several of the other 13C peaks reported for
the cis isomer did not match our data for compound 14, and we cannot
explain the discrepancy. Canonne, P.; Boulanger, R.; Bernatchez, M.
Tetrahedron 1989, 45, 2525-40.
Org. Lett., Vol. 3, No. 6, 2001
809