J. Hoffmann et al. / Chemical Physics Letters 354 (2002) 403–408
407
7
À1
6
0 kJ=mol, and mrea ¼ 8 Â 10 s [11]. At 465 K,
In order to relate the MC time to the number of
À1
the corresponding rate constants are kdes ¼ 0:5 s
reaction attempts, we define one MC step as N
trials of a adsorption–reaction event (N is the
s
À1
and krea ¼ 15 s , respectively. For CO diffusion,
s
CO
dif
one has
1
E
¼ 17 kJ=mol and
D
ꢂ
¼ 2:2 Â
number of adsorption sites). This means that MC
time is calculated by multiplying the total number
À3 À1
2
0
cm s [17], and accordingly at 465 K the CO
10
À1
jump rate is about 10 s . Thus, CO diffusion is
very rapid compared to all other steps. To char-
acterize the ratio of the rates of O diffusion and
catalytic cycle to that of CO diffusion, we employ
s
of trials by pcyc=N . With this definition, the MC
and real time are interconnected as tMC ¼ ðkdes
þ
k Þt.
rea
First, we have calculated the angular-integrated
O
the dimensionless parameters pdif and pcyc, respec-
2
reaction kinetics with O adsorption on all facets
tively. To save computational time, a CO jump rate
is used, which is only 100 times higher than the
reaction rate, i.e., pcyc ¼ 0:01. This rate was found
to be sufficient in order to reproduce a homoge-
neous distribution of CO under all conditions.
With the specifications above, our MC algo-
rithm is as follows:
(Fig. 3b). The agreement between experiment and
simulation is found to be good at all rates of O
diffusion (cf. e.g. Fig. 3a,b). Minor deviations re-
main with respect to the temperature dependence,
which are related to the coverage dependencies of
the activation barriers (see e.g. [11]). It is of in-
terest to note that in agreement with our experi-
(
1) A random number q (q 6 1) is generated. If
q < pcyc, an adsorption–reaction trial is realized
item (2)). For q > pcyc, an adsorbate-diffusion
trial is performed (item (3)).
2) An adsorption–reaction attempt contains
mental observations no hysteresis in the CO
2
formation rate is found with the present set of
kinetic parameters (this effect is, however, possible
for other sets of parameters [18]).
(
(
To simulate the angular-resolved experiments,
we switch off the oxygen adsorption on one of
the side facets (Fig. 2b). As expected, the reac-
tion rate on this facet (Fig. 5a) and the occu-
pation of the shaded facet by oxygen (Fig. 5b–e)
increase with increasing O diffusion rate in this
case. Under oxygen-rich conditions, the rate on
this facet becomes indistinguishable from that on
several steps. (i) An adsorption site on the catalyst
particle is chosen at random. (ii) A new random
number q is generated. (iii) If the site selected is
vacant, CO or O
described above provided that q < pCO and
0
2
adsorption events are realized as
0
0
CO
CO ¼ k =ðkdes þ
ad
p
k
CO < q < pCO þ pO2
,
where
p
O2
ad
reaÞ and pO2 ¼ k =ðkdes þ kreaÞ are the normalized
O
adsorption probabilities. (iv) If the site selected is
occupied by CO, a CO desorption or reaction
the non-shaded facets for p ’ 1 (this value
dif
O
dif
À1
O
dif
corresponds to k ’ 1500 s , or to E ¼ 85 kJ/
0
0
event is realized for q < p and q > pdes, where
mol provided that the pre-exponential factor is
À1
des
À3
2
p
des ¼ kdes=ðkdes þ kreaÞ. For the CO reaction, one
‘normal’, D
ꢂ
¼ 10 cm s ). At the same diffu-
nn site is chosen at random, and the trial is fulfilled
if the latter site is occupied by O. (v) If the site is
occupied by O, the trial ends (note that the reac-
tion is executed in the CO branch (item (iv))).
sion rate and under CO-rich conditions, ap-
proximately 80% of the maximum rate is
obtained on the shaded facet. The difference
arises as a consequence of the changes on the
oxygen residence time, which depends on the
steady-state coverages. The above given value for
the diffusion barrier should be considered as an
experimental upper limit. So far, no other
quantitative experimental data are available for
oxygen diffusion on Pd single crystal surfaces.
The value is consistent with recent theoretical
investigations which provide an estimate of 54
kJ/mol for the diffusion barrier on Pd(1 1 1) [19].
However, it cannot be excluded that on the
nanoparticles in addition to the regular diffusion
(
3) For adsorbate diffusion, an adsorption site is
chosen at random. If the site is vacant, the trial
ends. Otherwise, a CO or O particle located on this
site tries to diffuse. In particular, an adjacent site is
randomly selected, and if the latter site is vacant
and located on the particle lattice, and there are no
spatial constraints (as described above), CO jumps
to the destination site with unit probability. Jumps
of O are executed with the probability pdif com-
bined with the standard Metropolis rule in order
to take into account the O–O lateral interactions.