202
Y. Ma et al. / Chemical Physics Letters 388 (2004) 201–207
2
. Experiments
The apparatus, which had three chambers separately
pumped, was described previously [14,15]. The reaction
chamber has reverse-view low-energy electron diffrac-
tion and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy optics, an
ion gun, and a quadrupole mass spectrometer (QMS)
for angle-integrated (AI) measurements and monitoring
the partial pressures of reactants (PNO and PCO). The
chopper house, which had a pumping rate of about
7
m3 s for a high angle-resolution [16], has a narrow
ꢀ1
slit facing the reaction chamber and a cross-correlation
random chopper blade. The analyzer, connected
through a narrow tube, is equipped with another QMS
for AR-PDA and TOF analyses. The distance from the
ionizer to the chopper blade was 377 mm and the time
resolution was selected at 20 ls.
A gas mixture of 15NO and 13CO was introduced
through a doser with a small orifice (diameter; 0.1 mm)
about 2 cm from a sample crystal. For pressure-depen-
dence measurements, ordinary CO was additionally
backfilled. The products 15N2, 13CO and N O signals
15
2
2
were monitored in both AI and AR forms. Hereafter,
these are described as N , CO and N O in the text. The
2
2
2
desorption angle (polar angle; h) was scanned in the
plane along the [0 0 1] direction. The fragmentation of
N2O in both QMS was corrected.
3
. Results
3
.1. General features
Fig. 1. (a) TS-dependence of AR-signals of products with
a
(15
NO:13CO ¼ 1:4) mixture at 2.5 ꢁ 10
ꢀ5
Torr. (b) 15NO incidence
The AR signal was obtained by the analyzer QMS as
1
5
15
pressure dependence of the AR- N2 and N2O signals at h ¼ 0° at
the difference (DN2 for the N2 signal, for example) be-
tween the signal at the desired angle and the signal when
the crystal was away from the line-of-sight position. The
AR signals at h ¼ 0° for desorbing N , CO and N O,
15
fixed CO, and of the 15N2 signals at h ¼ 41°. The N2O fragmentation
was corrected for the 15N2 signals.
2
2
2
bution because of the Maxwellian velocity curves at the
surface temperature all over the angle [17]. The signal
intensity was corrected by this effect.
and the AR N signal at h ¼ 41° are displayed because of
2
their collimation angles as a function of the surface
temperature (TS) in Fig. 1a. All the signals in the steady-
state NO + CO reaction were negligible below 480 K. The
N2 signal at h ¼ 41° increased rapidly above 500 K with
increasing TS to a maximum at around 550 K and then
decreased at higher temperatures. The N2 signal at
h ¼ 0°, on the other hand, increased slowly and peaked at
3.2. Angular distribution
The CO2 desorption sharply collimated along the
surface normal in a cos13–16(h) form. On the other
hand, N2 desorption showed an inclined form colli-
mated at around 40° off the surface normal below
about 600 K. At higher temperatures, both the nor-
mally directed and cosine components were enhanced.
about 600 K. These differences in AR–N signals imply a
2
branching shift of N formation pathways with T . No
2
S
hysteresis was found in their signals with decreasing TS.
The above small orifice was effective to reduce N2
formation on the chamber wall, improving the AI-sig-
nal. Under this construction, the flux of incident reac-
tants towards the surface decreased proportionally to
cos(h) when the angle shifted from the normal direction.
This decrement was evaluated by monitoring the AR-
The N signal at 40° increased rapidly with P
(Fig.
NO
2
1b), whereas it showed a critical CO pressure in its
PCO-dependence (Fig. 2a). Thus, each desorption
component should be derived from angular and ve-
locity distribution analyses.
The AR–N signal is plotted against the desorption
2
angle in Fig. 2b. The total pressure with a mixture
signal of N O, which should follow the cosine distri-
2