SCHEME 1. Synthesis of Olefins 2b,c and a
Asymmetric Aminohydroxylation Reaction
SCHEME 2. Sharpless AD Reaction on Olefins
2b,ca
a
t
(
a) AD-mix R, MeSO2NH2, BuOH/H2O (1:1), 0 °C, 24 h, 87%,
ee ) 66% of (R)-4b, 90% of (R)-4c, ee ) 90%; (b) conditions of (a)
with AD-mix â, 87%, ee ) 66% of (S)-4b, 90% of (S)-4c, ee ) 90%.
aminohydroxylation on olefin 2c, we decided to use the
sulfamidate and sulfate protocols to achieve the target
3
R-CF -isoserine. Therefore, the key step in our synthetic
a
(
a) BnOH/TEA or HCl‚HN(OMe)Me/DIEA, Mukaiyama’s re-
routes will involve the Sharpless AD on olefins 2b,c.
As outlined in Scheme 2, olefins 2b,c were subjected
to Sharpless dihydroxylation conditions using AD-mix R
or â to give the mixture of compounds (S)-4b,c and (R)-
agent, CH2Cl2, reflux, 16 h; (b) BnOH or HCl‚HN(OMe)Me, DIEA,
DCC, CH2Cl2, 0 °C, 16 h; (c) (i) phthaloyl chloride, 140 °C; (ii)
HCl‚HN(OMe)Me, Py, CH2Cl2, -20 °C, 4 h; (d) (i) PCl5, CH2Cl2,
5 °C; (ii) HCl‚HN(OMe)Me, Py, CH2Cl2, 0 °C, 2 h; (e) LiOH‚H2O,
K2OsO4‚2H2O (5%), (DHQD)2PHAL (5%), AcNHBr, BuOH/H2O
1.5:1), 0 °C, 24 h, 84%.
2
t
4
b,c in good yields (87% from 2b and 90% from 2c).
(
Nevertheless, the enantioselectivity achieved from 2c
2
1
asymmetric aminohydroxylation15 of 2-(trifluoromethyl)-
acrylic acid derivatives as a key step. We therefore
synthesized two derivatives of commercially available
(90% ee) was better than that from 2b (66% ee).
We
observed that the reactivity or the degree and sense of
the enantioselectivity did not differ from those of similar
nonfluorinated substrates (2-methylacrylic acid deriva-
tives).20 These results are very important, because a
recent review concerning asymmetric catalytic reactions
2
-(trifluoromethyl)acrylic acid (2a) as prochiral fluorine-
containing starting materials: compounds 2b and 2c.
Several coupling methods were tested, and it was found
that the best conditions for the synthesis of olefin 2b
involved the use of Mukaiyama’s reagent (N-methyl-2-
chloropyridinium iodide). This approach gave a yield of
1
b
on fluorinated carbonyl and olefinic compounds de-
scribes several enantioselective reductions, but only one
example of the catalytic enantioselective oxidation of
prochiral fluorine-containing carbonyl compounds or ole-
fins.22 Likewise, these AD reactions on olefins 2b,c
constitute the first examples of non-Michael-type func-
tionalization of these types of substrate, which have been
described as excellent Michael acceptors.23
3
4% accompanied by a 15% yield of racemic Michael
coupling product 3b. In contrast, compound 2c was
obtained in 83% yield along with 8% of racemic Michael
coupling product 3c when DCC was used as the coupling
agent (Scheme 1). We proceeded to attempt the asym-
metric aminohydroxylation reaction on olefin 2c using
the conditions shown in Scheme 1. Under these condi-
tions, all of the starting material was consumed but
aminohydroxylation products were not detected. A mix-
ture of two compounds was obtained: dihydroxylation
product (10%) and the corresponding racemic compound
2
4
Treatment of diol (S)-4c with Burgess reagent gave
the corresponding sulfamidate (S)-5 as a single regio-
isomer25 in 34% yield when the reaction was carried out
at rt. This yield could be improved (51%) by carrying out
the reaction under reflux. Sulfamidate (S)-5 was quan-
3
titatively hydrolyzed in an acidic medium to give R-CF -
isoserine (S)-1 in its hydrochloride form (Scheme 3). In
this way, (S)-1‚HCl was obtained from olefin 2a in four
3
d, which is formed by Michael addition of acetamide on
olefin 2c (Scheme 1).
Recently, we achieved excellent results in the synthesis
of several enantiopure â2 -AA from two kinds of chiral
building blocks. These precursors were five-membered
(
19) (a) Kolb, H. C.; VanNiewenhze, M. S.; Sharpless, K. B. Chem.
,2
Rev. 1994, 94, 2483-2547. (b) Berrisford, D. J.; Bolm, C.; Sharpless,
K. B. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1995, 34, 1059-1070. (c) Johnson,
R. A.; Sharpless, K. B. In Catalytic Asymmetric Synthesis; Ojima, I.,
Ed.; VCH Publishers: New York, 1993; pp 227-272.
1
6
cyclic R-methylisoserine-derived sulfamidates and R-
methyl-R,â-dihydroxypropanoic acid-derived sulfates.1
These compounds were obtained from chiral 1,2-diols,
which in turn were synthesized by a Sharpless asym-
7,18
(
20) (a) Avenoza, A.; Cativiela, C.; Corzana, F.; Peregrina, J. M.;
Sucunza, D.; Zurbano, M. M. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2001, 12, 949-
9
2
53. (b) Bennani, Y. L.; Sharpless K. B. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34,
079-2082.
19
metric dihydroxylation (AD) on the corresponding olefin
using AD-mix R or â.20 Taking into account these facts,
and considering the previous results of asymmetric
(
21) The yield was calculated after column chromatography, and the
enantiomeric excess (ee) was determined by GC-MS (see Supporting
Information).
(
22) Bennani, Y. L.; Vanhessche, K. P. M.; Sharpless, B. Tetrahe-
dron: Asymmetry 1994, 5, 1473-1476.
(15) (a) Sharpless, K. B.; Bruncko, M.; Schlingloff, G. Angew. Chem.,
(23) (a) Colantoni, D.; Fioravanti, S.; Pellacani, L.; Tardella, P. A.
Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 197-200. (b) Sani, M.; Bruch e´ , L.; Chiva, G.;
Fustero, S.; Piera, J.; Volonteiro, A.; Zanda, M. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2003, 42, 2060-2063.
Int. Ed. Engl. 1997, 36, 1483-1486. (b) Sharpless, K. B.; Tao, B.;
Schlingloff, G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1998, 39, 2507-2510. (c) Song, C. E.;
Oh, C. R.; Roh, E. J.; Lee, S.; Choi, J. H. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
1
999, 10, 671-674. (d) O’Brien, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38,
(24) (a) Atkins, G. M.; Burgess, E. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94,
6135-6141. (b) Nicolaou, K. C.; Huang, X.; Snyder, S. A.; Rao, P. B.;
Bella, M.; Reddy, M. V. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 834-838. (c)
Nicolaou, K. C.; Snyder, S. A.; Longbottom, D. A.; Nalbandian, A. Z.;
Huang, X. Chem.-Eur. J. 2004, 10, 5581-5606. (d) Bower, J. F.;
Svenda, J.; Williams, A. J.; Charmant, J. P. H.; Lawrence, R. M.; Szeto,
P.; Gallagher, T. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 4727-4730.
3
26-329.
(16) Avenoza, A.; Busto, J. H.; Corzana, F.; Jim e´ nez-Os e´ s, G.;
Peregrina, J. M. Chem. Commun. 2004, 980-981.
(17) Avenoza, A.; Busto, J. H.; Corzana, F.; Jim e´ nez-Os e´ s, G.; Par ´ı s,
M.; Peregrina, J. M.; Sucunza, D.; Zurbano, M. M. Tetrahedron:
Asymmetry 2004, 15, 131-137.
(18) Avenoza, A.; Busto, J. H.; Corzana, F.; Garc ´ı a, J. I.; Peregrina,
(25) Mel e´ ndez, R. E.; Lubell, W. D. Tetrahedron 2003, 59, 2581-
2616.
J. M. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 4506-4513.
5722 J. Org. Chem., Vol. 70, No. 14, 2005