4
Tetrahedron
(c) Yoshida, J.; Kataoka, K.; Horcajada, R.; Nagaki, A. Chem.
Rev. 2008, 108, 2265. (d) Kärkäs, M. D. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2018,
47, 5786.
Shown below are some of the unsuccessful substrates attempted
in our electrochemical reactions. These subunits are present in
some of the biologically active compounds and may require
further rigorous methodology developments.
8. Fu, N.; Sauer, G. S.; Saha, A.; Loo, A.; Lin, S. Science, 2017, 357,
575.
9. Gao, W-J.; Li, W-C.; Zeng, C-C.; Tian, H-Y.; Hu, L-M.; Little, R.
D. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 79, 9613.
10. Vitaku, E.; Smith, D. T.; Njardarson, J. T. J. Med. Chem. 2014,
57, 10257.
11. Frankowski, K. J.; Liu, R.; Milligan, G. L.; Moeller, K. D.; Aubé,
J. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015, 54, 10555.
12. Typical electrochemical experimental details are shown here.
Compound 3a (tert-Butyl 4-(benzo[d]oxazol-2-yl)piperazine-1-
carboxylate): A 30 mL screw capped vial with a septum was
inserted carbon anode and aluminum cathode (CAUTION:
Electrodes should not come in contact with each other). The
electrodes were connected to a cell phone charger (5V) by use of
alligator clips. To the reaction vial were added benzoxazole 1
(119 mg, 1 mmol), N-Boc piperazine 2a (372 mg, 2 mmol), acetic
acid (300 mg, 5 mmol, 5 equiv.) and TBAI (37 mg, 10 mol %) and
the mixture was dissolved in 20 mL of acetonitrile and stirred
gently at room temperature. Electric current was passed through
the reaction vial at room temperature for 3 hours. The progress of
the reaction was monitored by TLC and LC-MS. After the
completion of the reaction, the solvent was removed in vacuo and
the crude material was re dissolved in ethyl acetate (25 mL) and
then washed with saturated aqueous sodium carbonate solution
(3X10 ml). The organic layer was separated, washed with water
and then dried over sodium sulfate. The product was purified by
column chromatography using hexane and ethyl acetate as eluent
to afford 282 mg of compound 3a (93% yield).
Scheme 6. Some of the unreacted amines in coupling reaction.
The aminobenzoxazole compounds obtained (e.g. 3h, 3n and 3s)
from our studies are amenable to further chemical
transformations. Scheme 7 shows our plans to derivatize these
newly synthesized aminobenzoxazoles to make focused libraries
of amides, sulfonamides, ureas, reductive amination products and
so on.
Scheme 7. Further transformations of compounds 3h, 3n and 3s
The compound 3a was characterized by NMR and mass spectral
analysis. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.40-7.42 (d, J = 8 Hz,
1H), 7.30-7.32 (d, J = 8 Hz, 1H), 7.20-7.24 (t, 1H), 7.06-7.10 (t,
1H), 3.70-3.73 (t, 4H), 3.59-3.62 (t, 4H), 1.53 (s, 9H). LC-MS
(m/z): 304.7 [M+1]+.
3. Conclusion
In conclusion, we have presented that pharmaceutically relevant
amino substituted benzoxazoles can be synthesized in a single
step that is clean, environmentally friendly and atom economic.
Moreover, the process eliminates the use of toxic reagents and
the reactions are easily scalable.
13. Intermediate A was observed in the LC-MS and as the reaction
proceeds, intermediate A converts completely to the product 3a
over a period of time. See supplementary details for crude LC-MS
trace and analytical details.
14. Wuitschik, G.; Carreira, E. M.; Wagner, B.; Fischer, H.; Parrilla,
I.; Schuler, F.; Rogers-Evans, M.; Müller, K. J. Med. Chem., 2010,
53, 3227.
Acknowledgements
We thank Mr. Vivek Sharma (Piramal Enterprises Limited) for
valuable support.
15. Feng, J.; Zhang, Z.; Wallace, M. B.; Stafford, J. A.; Kaldor, S. W.;
Kassel, D. B.; Navre, M.; Shi, L.; Skene, R. J.; Asakawa, T.;
Takeuchi, K.; Xu, R.; Webb, D. R.; Gwaltney, S. L. J. Med.
Chem., 2007 50, 2297.
16. Peprah, K.; Zhu, X. Y.; Eyunni, S. V. K.; Etukala, J. R.; Setola,
V.; Roth, B. L.; Ablordeppey, S. Y. Bioorg. Med. Chem., 2012,
20, 1671.
Supplementary Material
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found in
the online version.
17. Scale-up of Compound 3aa (2-Morpholinobenzo[d]oxazole): A
250 mL three neck flask was equipped with carbon anode and
aluminum cathode (CAUTION: Electrodes should not come in
contact with each other). The electrodes were connected to a cell
phone charger (5V) by use of alligator clips. To the reaction flask
were added benzoxazole 1 (10.0 g, 84 mmol), morpholine 2aa
(16.6 g, 168 mmol), acetic acid (25.2 g, 5 equiv.) and TBAI (3.1 g,
10 mol %) and the mixture was dissolved in 150 mL of
acetonitrile and stirred gently at room temperature. Electric current
was passed through the reaction flask at room temperature for
overnight. The progress of the reaction was monitored by TLC
and LC-MS. The work up was done according to ref. 12. The
product was purified by column chromatography using hexane and
ethyl acetate as eluent to afford 14.6 g of compound 3aa (85%
yield). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.41-7.42 (d, J = 7.6 Hz,
1H), 7.30-7.32 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.20-7.24 (t, 1H), 7.07-7.10 (t,
1H), 3.85-3.88 (t, 4H), 3.72-3.75 (t, 4H). LC-MS (m/z): 205.1
[M+1]+.
References and Notes
1. Murty, M. S. R.; Ram, K. R.; Rao, R. V.; Yadav, J. S.; Rao, J. V.;
Cheriyan, V. T.; Anto, R. J. Med. Chem. Res. 2011, 20, 576.
2. Ishibashi, S.; Arai, H.; Yokote, K.; Araki, E.; Suganami, H.;
Yamashita, S. J. Clin. Lipidology 2018, 12, 173.
3. (a) Liu, K. G.; Lo, J. R.; Comery, T. A.; Zhang, G. M.; Zhang, J.
Y.; Kowal, D. M.; Smith, D. L.; Di, L.; Kerns, E. H.; Schechter,
L. E.; Robichaud, A. J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2009, 19, 1115.
(b) Yang, Z.; Fairfax, D. J.; Maeng, J-H.; Masih, L.; Usyatinsky,
A.; Hassler, C.; Isaacson, S.; Fitzpatrick, K.; DeOrazio, R. J.;
Chen, J.; Harding, J. P.; Isherwood, M.; Dobritsa, S.; Christensen,
K. L.; Wierschke, J. D.; Bliss, B. I.; Peterson, L. H.; Beer, C. M.;
Cioffi, C.; Lynch, M.; Rennells, W. M.; Richards, J. J.; Rust, T.;
KhmelnitskyY. L.; Cohen, M. L.; Manning, D. D. Bioorg. Med.
Chem. Lett. 2010, 20, 6538.
Note: Use of 12V adaptor furnished less clean reaction profile as
compared to 5V adaptor.
18. Oldfield, V.; Keating G. M.; Perry, C. M. Drugs. 2017, 67, 1725.
4. Yan, M.; Kawamata, Y.; Baran, P. S. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117,
13230.
5. (a) Pütter, H. Industrial Electroorganic Chemistry, in Organic
Electrochemistry, 4th ed., Lund H. and Hammerich, O. Editors, p.
1259-1308, Marcel Dekker, New York (2001). (b) Botte, G.G.,
Daramola, D. A. and Muthuvel, M. Preparative Electrochemistry
for Organic Synthesis, in Comprehensive Organic Synthesis II,
Vol. 9, P. Knochel and G. A. Molander, Editors, p. 351-389,
Elsevier, The Netherlands (2014).
6. (a) Stork, G.; Davies, J. E.; Meisels, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1959,
81, 3419. (b) Stork, G.; Meisels, A.; Davies, J. E. J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1963, 85, 3419. (c) Kolbe, H. J. Prakt. Chem. 1847, 41, 138.
7. (a) Horn, E. J.; Rosen, B. R.; Baran, P. S. ACS Central Science,
2016, 2, 302. (b) Horn, E. J.; Rosen, B. R.; Chen, Y.; Tang, J.;
Chen, K.; Eastgate, M. D.; Baran, P. S. Nature, 2016, 533, 77.