increase the efficiency of catalytic conversion of longer chain
substrates (2-methyldecanoyl-CoA 1 vs. decanoyl-CoA 2)
but appears to have little effect on catalytic efficiency with
short-chain substrates.
In summary, this communication demonstrates that
straight-chain fatty acyl-CoA esters are able to bind to
recombinant human AMACR 1A and undergo deprotonation
and reprotonation events. Only one of the two a-protons is
exchanged in each AMACR catalytic cycle and the enzyme has
some degree of stereoselectivity. The origin of this stereo-
selectivity merits further investigation. These results also
reveal new details about the catalytic mechanism and substrate
binding characteristics of human AMACR 1A. Moreover,
this appears to be the only example of a racemase enzyme
catalysing proton-exchange in a non-racemisable substrate.
We thank Mr J. Crossman for purifying human recombinant
AMACR 1A. This work was funded by Cancer Research UK
and the Higher Education Commission of the Government of
Pakistan (support to FAS). Part of this work was undertaken
as an Erasmus Exchange Student Project by FP.
Fig. 3 Exchange of a-1H for 2H in straight-chain acyl-CoAs of
differing chain lengths. Error bars are ꢃ one standard deviation
(n = 2).
kcat = 0.0084 sꢂ1; kcat/Km = 37.4 Mꢂ1 ꢂ1. Therefore, the
s
S-2-methyldecanoyl-CoA 1S substrate appears to be
exchanged ca. 3-fold more efficiently than decanoyl-CoA 2,
as judged by kcat/Km. However, the non-Michaelis–Menten
behaviour of decanoyl-CoA 2 means this difference could be
significantly larger. It therefore seems likely that a-proton
exchange of straight-chain fatty acyl-CoA esters by AMACR
is not physiologically significant in the presence of branched-
chain substrates.
Notes and references
z Abbreviations used: AMACR, a-methylacyl-CoA racemase; MCR,
M. tuberculosis homologue of AMACR.
1 D. Darley, D. S. Butler, S. J. Prideaux, T. W. Thornton,
A. D. Wilson, T. J. Woodman, M. D. Threadgill and
M. D. Lloyd, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2009, 7, 543–552.
2 M. D. Lloyd, D. J. Darley, A. S. Wierzbicki and M. D. Threadgill,
FEBS J., 2008, 275, 1089–1102.
3 A. S. Wierzbicki, M. D. Lloyd, C. J. Schofield, M. D. Feher and
F. B. Gibberd, J. Neurochem., 2002, 80, 727–735.
4 J. A. Mobley, I. Leav, P. Zielie, C. Wotkowitz, J. Evans,
Y. W. Lam, B. S. L’Esperance, Z. Jiang and S. Ho, Cancer
Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., 2003, 12, 775–783.
5 J. F. Xu, T. Thornburg, A. R. Turner, M. Vitolins, D. Case,
J. Shadle, L. Hinson, J. L. Sun, W. N. Liu, B. L. Chang,
T. S. Adams, S. L. Zheng and F. M. Torti, Prostate, 2005, 63,
209–214.
6 M. Mukherji, C. J. Schofield, A. S. Wierzbicki, G. A. Jansen, R. J.
A. Wanders and M. D. Lloyd, Prog. Lipid Res., 2003, 42, 359–376.
7 W. Schmitz and E. Conzelmann, Eur. J. Biochem., 1997, 244,
434–440.
8 P. Bhaumik, W. Schmitz, A. Hassinen, J. K. Hiltunen,
E. Conzelmann and R. K. Wierenga, J. Mol. Biol., 2007, 367,
1145–1161.
9 J. Luo, S. Zha, W. R. Gage, T. A. Dunn, J. L. Hicks, C. J. Bennett,
C. N. Ewing, E. A. Platz, S. Ferdinandusse, R. J. Wanders,
J. M. Trent, W. B. Isaacs and A. M. De Marzo, Cancer Res.,
2002, 62, 2220–2226.
10 T. Thornburg, A. R. Turner, Y. Q. Chen, M. Vitolins, B. Chang
and J. Xu, Future Oncol., 2006, 2, 213–223.
11 S. Zha, S. Ferdinandusse, S. Denis, R. J. Wanders, C. M. Ewing,
J. Luo, A. M. De Marzo and W. B. Isaacs, Cancer Res., 2003, 63,
7365–7376.
The effect of chain-length on the rates of proton exchange of
acyl-CoA substrates by AMACR was then investigated by
incubation of acyl-CoAs of varying chain lengths with
the enzyme for 16 h at 30 1C in buffer containing 2H2O.
Acetyl-CoA was not significantly converted ({1% conver-
sion). The extents of exchange of the a-protons for deuterium
for C4–C10 straight-chain substrates were measured by 1H
NMR (Fig. 3). Increasing the length of the side-chain of
the acyl-CoA ester increased the extent of conversion.
Butanoyl-CoA was exchanged to o5%, whilst pentanoyl-
CoA, hexanoyl-CoA and heptanoyl-CoA were exchanged to
10–25%. The greatest levels of exchange (ca. 40%) were
observed for octanoyl-CoA and decanoyl-CoA 2. Conversion
of S-2-methyldecanoyl-CoA 1S was >95% under the same
conditions. This apparent dependence of the binding and
turnover of the substrates on the chain-length is consistent
with substrate binding by hydrophobic interactions with the
enzyme. Interestingly, the crystal structures of MCR8 with
acyl-CoA ligands bound show that the side-chain of the
substrate interacts with a methionine-rich hydrophobic region
at the entrance of the active site.
12 K. Takahara, H. Azuma, T. Sakamoto, S. Kiyama, T. Inamoto,
N. Ibuki, T. Nishida, H. Nomi, T. Ubai, N. Segawa and
Y. Katsuoka, Anticancer Res., 2009, 29, 2497–2505.
13 A. J. Carnell, I. Hale, S. Denis, R. J. A. Wanders, W. B. Isaacs,
B. A. Wilson and S. Ferdinandusse, J. Med. Chem., 2007, 50,
2700–2707.
14 D. Parker, J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1983, 83–88.
15 J. M. Schwab and D. C. T. Lin, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1985, 107,
6046–6052.
Conversion of 2-methylpropanoyl-CoA (isobutyryl-CoA)
by AMACR was also investigated. Only ca. 1% exchange of
1H to 2H was observed under these assay conditions,
compared to o5% for butanoyl-CoA. These two substrates
have the same number of carbon atoms and differ only in
length of side-chain and in that the former is a branched-chain
substrate. Thus, the presence of a methyl group appears to
ꢁc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010
3350 | Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 3348–3350