2
198
C. Pavlik et al.
LETTER
uisite enol. It is not necessary to generate a free 13C NMR (75.5 MHz, CD
carbocation, as it is possible that as positive charge begins
OD): d = 209.6, 176.6, 131.8, 47.6, 45.4,
3
2
8.3, 27.6, 21.8, 21.4, 13.8, 10.4.
to develop on the distal carbon, participation of the prox- MS (EI): m/z = 194.1, 151, 140, 111, 43, 41.
imal C=C unit leads directly to cyclization. Presumably,
water removes the proton from the cyclized intermediate 194.1731.
in an E1-type reaction to give an enol, and tautomerization
gives the final product. This mechanism does not require
reduction of the polymer, which is consistent with our ob-
servations. Water is essential for the observed reactivity
due to formation of a localized acid. This working hypoth-
esis requires experimental verification, of course, but is
consistent with the data we have collected so far.
+
+
HRMS (ESI ): m/z [M + H ] calcd for C H O: 194.1704; found:
1
3
22
Supporting Information for this article is available online at
http://www.thieme-connect.com/ejournals/toc/synlett. Included are
experimental details for all Nazarov products.
References
(
1) (a) Nazarov, I. N.; Torgov, I. B.; Terekhova, L. N. Izv. Akad.
Nauk. SSSR, Otd. Khim. Nauk 1941, 211. (b) Braude, E. A.;
Forbes, W. F. J. Chem. Soc. 1953, 2208.
In conclusion, we have shown that dienones are converted
to Nazarov cyclization products in the presence of the
polymer PEDOT , in an heterogeneous system and in hy-
+
(
2) (a) Smith, M. B.; March, J. March’s Advanced Organic
drocarbon solvents. We have shown examples in which a
normal Nazarov cyclization product is formed upon expo-
sure to the polymer, where poor reactivity or rearrange-
ment is reported in the literature. We believe that this new
protocol offers some advantages when compared to a typ-
ical Nazarov cyclization in terms of the experimental
technique, in that the dienone is simply heated at reflux in
the hydrocarbon solvent with the polymer, cooled, and fil-
tered to give the product. Improved yields in some cases,
and the ability to give a Nazarov cyclization product in
cases where treatment with acid fails or leads to an unde-
sirable rearrangement, make this protocol a useful addi-
tion to Nazarov cyclization reactions reported in the
literature.
Chemistry, 6th ed.; John Wiley and Sons: Hoboken, 2007,
1095. (b) The Merck Index, 14th ed.; Merck: Whitehouse
Station NJ, 2006, ONR-64. (c) Mundy, B. P.; Ellerd, M. G.;
Favaloro, F. G. Jr. Name Reactions and Reagents in Organic
Synthesis, 2nd ed.; Wiley-Interscience: Hoboken, 2005,
448–449. For recent reviews, see: (d) Denmark, S. E. In
Comprehensive Organic Synthesis, Vol. 5; Paquette, L. A.,
Ed.; Pergamon Press: Oxford, 1991, 751–784.
(
1
e) Habermas, K. L.; Denmark, S. E. Org. React. 1994, 45,
. (f) Pellissier, H. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 6479. (g) Tius,
M. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2005, 2193. (h) Frontier, A. J.;
Collison, C. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 7577.
(
3) Hayashi, S.; Motoyoshiya, J.; Yazaki, T. J. Org. Chem.
1
989, 56, 735.
4) (a) Frontier, A. J.; Collison, C. Tetrahedron 2005, 61, 7577.
b) Habermas, K. L.; Denmark, S. E.; Jones, T. K. Org.
(
(
React. 1994, 45, 1. (c) Santelli-Rouvier, C.; Santelli, M.
Synthesis 1983, 429. For a reagent-free Nazarov cyclization
that proceeds without added Lewis acids, see: (d) Douelle,
F.; Tal, L.; Greaney, M. F. Chem. Commun. 2005, 660.
5) (a) Akiyama, T. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107, 5744. (b) Basak, A.
K.; Shimada, N.; Bow, W. F.; Vicic, D. A.; Tius, M. A.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 8266. (c) Bolaño, T.;
Typical Experimental Procedure
3
,4-Diphenylcyclopent-2-enone (12)
(
A 100 mL round-bottomed flask was charged with toluene (60 mL)
and a magnetic stirbar. (1E,4E)-1,5-Diphenylpenta-1,4-dien-3-one
2
9
(
3, 0.234 g, 1 mmol) was added, followed by 1 (0.57 g, 1 mmol).
Castarlanas, R.; Esteruelas, M. A.; Oñate, E. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2009, 131, 2064. (d) Zhang, J.; Vaidya, T.; Brennessel,
W. W.; Frontier, A. J.; Eisenberg, R. Organomet. 2010, 29,
A reflux condenser fitted with a septum was attached and a nitrogen
inlet inserted in the septum. The system was heated at reflux over-
night. After cooling, the polymer was removed by filtration and
3341. (e) Vaidya, T.; Atesin, A. C.; Herrick, I. R.; Frontier,
washed with Et O (10 mL). The filtrate was concentrated in vacuo
2
A. J.; Eisenberg, R. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 3363.
(f) Janka M., He W., Haedicke I. E., Fronczek F. R., Frontier
A. J., Flaschenriem C., Eisenberg R.; J. Am. Chem. Soc.;
to give a brown oil. Purification by flash chromatography (EtOAc–
hexane) gave 3,4-diphenylcyclopent-2-enone (7) as a clear oil
3
0
(
0.166 g, 0.071 mmol, 71%).
2
006, 128: 5312 . For a Nazarov cyclization catalyzed by a
1
H NMR (300 MHz, CD OD): d = 7.55–7.49 (m, 2 H), 7.30–7.12
3
supramolecular host, see: (g) Hastings, C. J.; Pluth, M. D.;
(
m, 8 H), 6.74 (d, J = 1.6 Hz. 1 H), 4.61 (ddd, J = 1.7, 2.4, 7.5 Hz,
Bergman, R. G.; Raymond, K. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010,
1
H), 3.11 (dd, J = 7.3, 18.8 Hz, 1 H), 2.45 (dd, J = 2.1, 18.5 Hz, 1
132, 6938.
H).
(
6) (a) Dalpozzo, R.; Bartoli, G.; Sambri, L.; Melchiorre, P.
Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 3501. (b) Rueping, M.; Ieawsuwan,
W.; Antonchick, A. P.; Nachtsheim, B. J. Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed. 2007, 46, 2097.
1
3
C NMR (75.5 MHz, CD OD): d = 206.0, 154.0, 141.0, 140.0,
3
1
31.0, 129.4, 128.7, 128.0, 127.8, 127.3, 126.4, 49.7, 39.3.
MS (EI): m/z = 234, 205, 191, 179, 157, 128, 102, 91, 77, 63.
(7) (a) Denmark, S. E.; Jones, T. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982,
1
04, 2642. (b) Denmark, S. E.; Habermas, K. L.; Hiite, G. A.
3
,4-Diisopropyl-2,5-dimethylcyclopent-2-enone (21)
Helv. Chim. Acta 1988, 71, 168. (c) Basak, A. K.; Shimada,
N.; Bow, W. F.; Vicic, D. A.; Tius, M. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
The reaction of (3E,6E)-2,4,6,8-tetramethylnona-3,6-dien-5-one
2
2
(
19, 0.194 g, 1 mmol) and 1 (0.57 g, 1 mmol) under the standard
condtions gave 3,4-diisopropyl-2,5-dimethylcyclopent-2-enone
21)24 as a waxy solid (0.133 g, 0.69 mmol, 69%, 10:1 trans/cis by
2
010, 132, 8266. (d) Malona, J. M.; Cariou, K.; Frontier, A.
J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 7560. (e) Spencer, W. T.;
Levin, M. D.; Frontier, A. J. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 414.
(
NMR analysis). Spectral data are reported for the trans compound.
(
f) Tius, M. A. Acc Chem. Res. 2003, 36, 284.
1
H NMR (300 MHz, CD OD): d = 2.87–2.61 (m, 2 H), 2.54 (m, 1
(8) (a) He, W.; Herrick, I. R.; Atesin, T. A.; Caruana, P. A.;
Lellenberger, C. A.; Frontier, A. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008,
130, 1003. (b) Liang, G.; Gradl, S. N.; Trauner, D. Org. Lett.
3
H), 2.23 (q, J = 7.3 Hz, 1 H), 1.93 (m, 3 H), 1.31 (d, J = 3.5 Hz, 3
H), 1.15 (d, J = 4.3 Hz, 6 H), 0.97 (d, J = 4.5, 6 H).
Synlett 2011, No. 15, 2195–2199 © Thieme Stuttgart · New York