JOꢁRꢃAL OF ASꢄAꢃ ꢃATꢁRAL PROꢅꢁꢆTS RꢂSꢂARꢆH
5
3
. Experimental
3
.1. General experimental procedures
Optical rotations were determined on a PolAAr-3005 digital polarimeter (OA Co., Ltd,
Cambridgeshire, UK). IR spectra were obtained on a Vertex 70 FT-IR (by a KBr disk
method) spectrometer (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany). NMR spectra were measured in pyri-
dine-d on a Varian INOVA 600 spectrometer (Palo Alto, CA, USA). HRESI mass spectra
5
were recorded using a Waters SYNAPT (Q-TOF) mass spectrometer. Silica gel (200–300
mesh, from Haiyang Chemical Group Co., Qingdao, China) and RI-102 ODS-A-HG (Ymc
Co., Kyoto, Japan) were used. Compounds were finally isolated with the help of a Hanbon
Sci. & Tech NP7000 preparative HPLC system equipped with a Shodex detector using an
ODS column (YMC-ODS, 20 × 250 mm, 5 μm). TLC was carried out on silica gel GF254
(
0.15–0.20 mm) (from Jiangyou silica gel Group Co., Yantai, China) and the spots were
visualized by spraying with 10% H SO and heating.
2
4
3
.2. Plant material
e whole plant of Beesia calthaefolia was collected at Wudang, Guiyang City, Guizhou
Province, China in 2009 and identified by Dr. Jianxin Zhang, key laboratory of Chemistry
for Natural Products of Guizhou Province and Chinese Academy of Sciences. e voucher
specimen (collection No 196) is deposited in the Department of Clinical Pharmacology,
PLA General Hospital.
3
.3. Extraction and isolation
e air-dried and pulverized whole plant of B. calthaefolia (6.8 kg) was extracted two times
with 95% EtOH for 2 h under reflux (80 L × 2) and then extracted with 50% EtOH for 2 h
under reflux (80 L × 2). Af er removal of solvent, the residue (1.0 kg) obtained by 50%
EtOH was suspended in water (1000 ml) and partitioned successively with petroleum ether
(
1000 ml × 6), CHCl (1000 ml × 6), EtOAc (1000 ml × 6), and n-BuOH (1000 ml × 6).
3
e CHCl -soluble fraction (170 g) was subjected to low-pressure column chromatog-
3
raphy on silica gel (200–300 mesh). Gradient elution with petroleum ether–EtOAc (1:4,
1
:6, 1:9,), EtOAc, EtOAc–MeOH (20:1, 15:1, 10:1), and MeOH gave nine fractions, A (8 g),
B (9 g), C (10 g), D (12 g), E (10 g), F (15 g), G (12 g), H (15 g), and I (9 g). e fraction D
further separated by Silica gel (200–300 mesh) eluting with CHCl –MeOH (40:1–8:1) and
3
preparative HPLC at a flow rate of 15.0 ml/min to afford 2 (300 mg, t = 19.8 min, 75%
R
MeOH). e fraction E was further separated by silica gel (200–300 mesh) eluting with
CHCl –MeOH (30:1–12:1) and preparative HPLC at a flow rate of 15.0 ml/min to afford 13
3
(
11 mg, t = 7.5 min, 75% MeOH). Fraction F was fractionated by LPLC over Silica gel H to
R
give six smaller fractions, eluting with CHCl –MeOH (40:1–8:1). e fif h was further sepa-
3
rated by ODS column chromatography [MeOH:H O(65:35→68:32→70:30→75:25→80:20)] to
2
afford 9 (9.9 mg) and by preparative HPLC at a flow rate of 15.0 ml/min to afford 4 (105 mg,
t = 21.4 min, 75% MeOH) and 3 (45 mg, t = 6.8 min, 75% MeOH). Fraction H was iso-
R
R
lated by LPLC over Silica gel H, eluting with CHCl –MeOH (40:1–9:1) to give four small
3
fractions. e fourth fraction was further separated by preparative HPLC at a flow rate of