polymerization. Fig. S2 in the ESIw displays the optical
response of the films prepared under different ratios. In this
case, where a higher ratio of cross-linker to monomer
(e.g. 2 : 1) is used, more rigid matrix will be formed for the
photonic PIL structure, and the swelling/shrinking capability
of the film will be strongly reduced. In contrast, if too little
cross-linker is used, a well-defined and ordered porous
polymer film is hardly formed, due to insufficient mechanical
strength. Thus, it is possible to achieve a sensing material with
optimized swelling and reflection properties through balancing
different influence factors. Interestingly, in our case the
distinct capability of ion-exchange of IL provides another
convenient and attractive way to tune sensing properties.
Fig. 4 Influence of counteranion (BrÀ and SDSÀ) on the sensing
selectivity of the photonic PIL sensors.
3À
The replacement of BrÀ with the more hydrophilic PO4
Based on the concept of ‘‘task-specific’’ ionic liquids,3
functional groups as anions can also be introduced into IL
units, leading to photonic PILs with specific sensing functions.
In summary, based on the combination of the unique
properties of both ILs and photonic structure, a new concept
was developed to further extend the application scope of ILs
as sensing materials. The integration of ordered macropores
with poly(ionic liquid)s can not only afford a new class of
self-reporting humidity sensors with excellent reversibility,
which are able to rapidly, sensitively and visually indicate
environmental humidity. Because both ionic liquids and
photonic structures offer virtually unlimited tunability, their
combination also provides a unique platform with tremendous
opportunities for the design of new sensing materials or
chemical systems.
anion (Fig. S3, ESI)w facilely affords more sensitive humidity
sensors with a shift range approaching 180 nm (Fig. S4, ESI).w
In recent years, the same principle of using optical response
of photonic structure has been employed for the development
of various stimuli-responsive polymers.9 In this respect, two
studies were described for the fabrication of humidity sensors.
Barry and Wiltzius first reported the fabrication of a humidity
sensing inverse opal hydrogel of polyacryamide (PAAm),10a
which could be operated outside of a supporting solvent with a
response time of the order of seconds. But, due to the
insufficient mechanical strength of PAAm, the sample was
hardly repeatedly used under high humidity conditions, and
otherwise, its maximum peak shift was only 31 nm, which
made it difficult to detect the humidity change with the naked
eye. More recently, Song and his co-workers developed a
humidity sensing material by combining the intrinsic humidity
sensitivity of PAAm and the structural color of PS/PMM/PAA
colloidal crystal array.10b Although the reported composites
could be used to realize colorimetric detection of humidity
with excellent stability and reversibility, the response seemed
too slow (1.5 h). In comparison, the PIL-based sensor in this
study overcomes the mentioned drawbacks in previous work,
and is enable to rapidly, sensitively and visually indicate
environmental humidity. To the best of our knowledge, this
is the first report of producing humidity sensors based on
photonic structured ionic liquid materials.
Notes and references
1 Ionic Liquids in Synthesis, ed. P. Wasserscheid and T. Welton,
Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2008.
2 R. D. Rogers and K. R. Seddon, Science, 2003, 302, 792.
3 (a) J. S. Lee, X. Wang, H. Luo, G. A. Baker and S. Dai, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 4596; (b) S. G. Lee, Chem. Commun., 2006,
1049; (c) Z. Fei, T. J. Geldbach, D. Zhao and P. J. Dyson,
Chem.–Eur. J., 2006, 12, 2122; (d) M. Armand, F. Endres,
D. R. MacFarlane, H. Ohno and B. Scrosati, Nat. Mater., 2009,
8, 621.
4 (a) J. E. Bara, D. E. Camper, D. L. Gin and R. D. Noble,
Acc. Chem. Res., 2010, 43, 152; (b) M. Antonietti, D. Kuang,
B. Smarsly and Y. Zhou, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2004, 43, 4988;
(c) T. P. Lodge, Science, 2008, 321, 50; (d) Z. Ma, J. Yu and S. Dai,
Adv. Mater., 2009, 21, 1.
The successful fabrication of an optical humidity sensor
demonstrates that the introduction of ordered macroporous
structures is an effective way to further extend the application
scope of ILs as sensing materials. More significantly, we
believe that the association of unique optical properties of
photonic structure with the superior sensing features of ILs
mentioned in introduction section actually provides a very
useful platform for development of novel self-reporting VOCs
chemical sensors. Recently, systematic studies of Brennecke’s
group showed that the nature of the anion has the most
significant influence on the gas solubilities,11 and the anion-
exchange can dramatically change the affinities of selected gas
species in ILs. The preliminary experiments in our present
work also confirmed this result. The photonic PIL film with
BrÀ as counteranions shows a preferred affinity of water
over ethanol vapor. After the anion-exchange with SDSÀ
(Fig. S5, ESI);w however, the resulting PIL film exhibits
completely different sensing selectivity (Fig. 4 and Fig. S6, ESI).w
5 C. Liang, C. Yuan, R. J. Warmack, C. E. Barnes and S. Dai, Anal.
Chem., 2002, 74, 2172.
6 (a) I. Goubaidoulline, G. Vidrich and D. Johannsmann, Anal.
Chem., 2005, 77, 615; (b) X. Jin, L. Yu, D. Garcia, R. Ren and
X. Zeng, Anal. Chem., 2006, 78, 6980; (c) E. Chung, N. Lavrik,
P. Datskos, J. Mcfarlane, S. Dai and C. Tsouris, AIChE J., 2007,
53, 2726; (d) L. Yu, D. Garcia, R. Ren and X. Zeng, Chem.
Commun., 2005, 2277.
7 (a) A. Stein, F. Li and N. R. Denny, Chem. Mater., 2008, 20, 649;
(b) O. D. Velev and E. W. Kaler, Adv. Mater., 2000, 12, 531.
8 J. Huang, C. Tao, Q. An, W. Zhang, Y. Wu, X. Li, D. Sheng and
G. Li, Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 967.
9 (a) M. Harun-Ur-Rashid, T. Seki and Y. Takeoka, Chem. Rec.,
2009, 9, 87; (b) F. Marlow, M. Parvin Sharifi, R. Brinkman and
C. Mendive, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 6212.
10 (a) R. A. Barry and P. Wiltzius, Langmuir, 2006, 22, 1369;
(b) E. Tian, J. Wang, Y. Zheng, Y. Song, L. Jiang and D. Zhu,
J. Mater. Chem., 2008, 18, 1116.
11 J. A. Anthony, J. L. Anderson, E. J. Maginn and J. F. Brennecke,
J. Phys. Chem. B, 2005, 109, 6366.
ꢀc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2010
Chem. Commun., 2010, 46, 4103–4105 | 4105