Scheme 1
interconnect them (not unlike the cross-linking of polymer
chains). Compound 1 in Scheme 1 sprung from this idea.
Several features of 1 need explanation. (a) The compounds
are polyvalent at both termini; multiple simultaneous interac-
6
tions are known to enhance associative processes in biology.
Previously described scaffolds bearing polyvalent glycocon-
7
8
9
jugates include cyclodextrins, proteins, dendrimers, gold
nanoparticles, vesicles,
1
0
11,12
13
self-assembled monolayers,
self-aggregates,14 and cluster compounds.15 (b) Spacers
separating our calixarenes vary in length from 16 atoms (1a),
to 21 atoms (1b), to 29 atoms (1c).
The variations were prompted by the fact that we did not
know if undesirable “looping” (i.e., intracellular binding
competitive with the transcellular connectivity) would be
minimized with certain spacer lengths. Both polar and
nonpolar spacers were investigated. (c) In addition to 14
galactose units, bis-calixarenes 1 each possess 8 undecyl
Figure 1. MALDI-MS of 1a after using (A) Cs
CO in the 6-to-7 transformation.
2 3 2
CO and (B) K -
3
compounds. First and foremost, we faced the need to
monoderivatize one of eight equivalent hydroxyls in calix-
[
4]resorcarene to form 2. By using 1.3 equiv of bromo-ester,
it was possible to obtain 2 in 30% yield along with, roughly,
0% starting calixarene and 20% material with 2-4 alkyl
groups. Chromatography with gradient elution (0-20% CH
CN in CHCl on silica) allowed isolation of 2. Acetylation
of the remaining seven hydroxyls with Ac O followed by
5
groups in accordance with Aoyama’s cell-binding monomer.
It is likely, but not yet established, that the hydrocarbon
5
16
chains (assumed to be all-cis ) contribute hydrophobically
to docking at the cancer cells’ outer membrane surface.
The nine-step synthesis of 1 (Scheme 2) encountered
special problems related to the handling of polyfunctional
3
-
3
2
deprotection of the carboxyl (leaving the acetates untouched)
gave 4. Compound 4 allowed a DCC-promoted coupling with
a diamine “spacer” in moderate yields. Under our reaction
conditions, the diamines preferentially linked the calixarenes
(as opposed to deacylating them) to give 5. Coupling yields
were low when the hydroxyls were not acetylated. Removal
of the acetate groups in the presence of the amide groups
was surprisingly touchy: since neither aqueous HCl nor
(6) Mammen, M.; Choi, S.-K.; Whitesides, G. M. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 1998, 37, 2755.
(7) Fulton, D. A.; Stoddart, J. F. Bioconjugate Chem. 2001, 12, 655.
(8) Lemieux, G. A.; Bertozzi, C. R. Chem. Biol. 2001, 8, 265.
(9) Zanini, D.; Roy, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 2088.
(10) Hern a´ iz, M. J.; de la Fuente, J. M.; Barrientos, A. G.; Penad e´ s, S.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 1554.
11) Ma, Z.; Li, J.; Liu, M.; Cao, J.; Zou, Z.; Tu, J.; Jiang, L. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 12678.
12) Chenevier, P.; Grandjean, C.; Loing, E.; Malingue, F.; Angyalosi,
G.; Gras-Masse, H.; Roux, D.; Melnyk, O.; Bourel-Bonnet, L. Chem. Comm.
002, 20, 2446.
13) Horan, N.; Yan, L.; Isobe, H.; Whitesides, G. M.; Kahne, D. Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1999, 96, 11782.
14) Akiyoshi, K.; Deguchi, S.; Moriguchi, N.; Yamaguchi, S.; Sunamoto,
J. Macromolecules 1993, 26, 3062.
15) Grandjean, C.; Angyalosi, G.; Loing, E.; Adriaenssens, E.; Melnyk,
O.; Pancre, V.; Auriault, C.; Gras-Masse, H. Chem. BioChem. 2001, 2, 747.
(
(
2 3
NaOH performed well, we resorted to aqueous K CO to
secure 6 in high yield.
2
(
In synthesizing their monomeric calixarene, Aoyama et
5
(
al. octa-alkylated the parent calixarene with bromo-aceto-
(
(16) Fujimoto, T.; Shimizu, C.; Hayashida, O.; Aoyama, Y. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 1997, 119, 6676.
262
Org. Lett., Vol. 6, No. 2, 2004