Page 11 of 13
Journal Name
Dalton Transactions
Please do not adjust margins
DOI: 10.1039/C6DT03754B
ARTICLE
1
0 a) H. A. Choy and G. H. Jones, Arch. Biochem. Biophys., 1981,
11, 55; b) C. E. Barry III, P. G. Nayar and T. P. Begley, J. Am.
coupling. On the other hand, if the orbitals have
considerable overlap but are non-orthogonal, the spins will
2
Chem. Soc., 1988, 110, 3333; c) C. E. Barry III, P. G. Nayar and
T. P. Begley, Biochemistry, 1989, 28, 6323; d) J. C. Freeman,
P. G. Nayar, T. P. Begley and J. J. Willafranca, Biochemistry,
preferably
orient
antiparallel,
leading
to
an
antiferromagnetic coupling. b) J. Kanamori, J. Phys. Chem.
Solids, 1959, 10, 87–98. c) O. Kahn, P. Tola, J. Galy, H.
Coudanne, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1978, 100, 3931–3933. d) T.
Glaser, H. Theil, I. Liratzis, T. Weyhermüller, E. Bill, Inorg.
Chem., 2006, 45, 4889–4891. e) M. A. Palacios, A. Rodríguez-
Diéguez, A. Sironi, J. M. Herrera, A. J. Mota, J. Cano, E.
Colacio, Dalton Trans, 2009, 8538.
1
993, 32, 4826.
1
1
1
1
1 A. W. Smith, A. Camara-Artigas, M. Wang, J. P. Allen and W.
A. Francisco, Biochemistry, 2006, 45, 4378.
2 C. Mukherjee, T. Weyhermuler, E. Bothe, E. Rentschler and
Phalguni Chaudhuri, Inorg. Chem. 2007, 46, 9895.
3 M. Fujita, K. Umemoto, M. Yoshizawa, N. Fujita, T. Kusukawa
and K. Biradha, Chem. Commun., 2001, 509–518.
4 a) R. Sessoli, H.-L. Tsai, A. R. Schake, S. Wang, J. B. Vincent, K.
Folting, D. Gatteschi, G. Christou and D. N. Hendrickson, J.
Am. Chem. Soc., 1993, 115, 1804–1816; b) R. Sessoli, D.
29 a) E. Ruiz, J. Cano, S. Alvarez, P. Alemany, J. Comput. Chem.,
1999, 20, 1391-1400; b) E. Ruiz, A. Rodríguez-Fortea, J. Cano,
S. Alvarez, P. Alemany, J. Comput. Chem., 2003, 24, 982-989;
c) E. Ruiz, S. Alvarez, J. Cano, V. Polo, J. Chem. Phys., 2005,
123, 164110/1-164140/7.
Gatteschi, A. Caneschi and M. A. Novak, Nature, 1993, 365
,
1
41–142.
30 S. K. Dey and A. Mukherjee, Coord. Chem. Rev. 2016, 310, 80.
5 a) T. C. Stamatatos, C. G. Efthymiou, C. C. Stoumpos and S. P. 31 a) W. C. Wolsely. J Chem Educ, 1973, 50, 335-336; b) A. A.
1
Perlepes, Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2009, 3361–3391; b) A. A.
Kitos, C. G. Efthymiou, C. Papatriantafyllopoulou, V.
Nastopoulos, A. J. Tasiopoulos, M. J. Manos, W.
Schilts, Perchloric acid and perchlorates, The G. Frederick
Smith chemical Co., Columbus, Ohio, (1979); c) D. E.
Penningeton, Chem. Eng. News, 1982, 60, 54-55.
Wernsdorfer, G. Christou and S. P. Perlepes, Polyhedron, 32 D. T. Sawyer, A. Sobkowiak, J. L. Roberts, Electrochemistry for
nd
2
011, 30
Papatriantafyllopoulou, G. Aromi, S. J. Teat, G. Christou and 33 O. V. Dolomanov, L. J Bourhis, R. J. Gildea, J. Howard and H.
S. P. Perlepes, Polyhedron, 2011, 30, 3022–3025.
Puschmann, J. Appl. Cryst., 2009 ,42, 339.
6 A. W. Addison, T. N. Rao, J. Reedijk, J. Van Rijn and G. C. 34 L. J. Bourhis, O. V. Dolomanov, R. J. Gildea, J. Howard and H.
Verschoor, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 1984, 1349–1356.
Puschmann, Acta Cryst. A, 2015, 71(1) 59.
7 Ranges of equatorial Cu-O bonds are as follows: Cu1 1.910 to 35 G. M. Sheldrick. Acta Cryst., 2008, 64, 112.
,
2987–2996; c) C. G. Efthymiou, C.
Chemists, J. Wiley & Sons, New York, 2 ed., 1995, 333
1
1
1
1
.979 Å, Cu2 1.897 to 1.985 Å, Cu3 1.920 to 1.989 Å, Cu4 36 M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel, G. E. Scuseria, M. A.
.909 to 1.982 Å for 3a·2DMF·2H
2
O and Cu1 1.909 to 1.965
Robb, J. R. Cheeseman, G. Scalmani, V. Barone, B. Mennucci,
G. A. Petersson, H. Nakatsuji, M. Caricato, X. Li, H. P.
Hratchian, A. F. Izmaylov, J. Bloino, G. Zheng, J. L.
Sonnenberg, M. Hada, M. Ehara, K. Toyota, R. Fukuda, J.
Hasegawa, M. Ishida, T. Nakajima, Y. Honda, O. Kitao, H.
Nakai, T. Vreven, J. A. Montgomery Jr, J. E. Peralta, F.
Ogliaro, M. Bearpark, J. J. Heyd, E. Brothers, K. N. Kudin, V.
N. Staroverov, T. Keith, R. Kobayashi, J. Normand, K.
Raghavachari, A. Rendell, J. C. Burant, S. S. Iyengar, J. Tomasi,
M. Cossi, N. Rega, N. J. Millam, M. Klene, J. E. Knox, J. B.
Cross, V. Bakken, C. Adamo, J. Jaramillo, R. Gomperts, R. E.
Stratmann, O. Yazyev, A. J. Austin, R. Cammi, C. Pomelli, J. W.
Ochterski, R. L. Martin, K. Morokuma, V. G. Zakrzewski, G. A.
Voth, P. Salvador, J. J. Dannenberg, S. Dapprich, A. D.
Daniels, Ö. Farkas, J. B. Foresman, J. V. Ortiz, J. Cioslowski, D.
J. Fox, Gaussian 09, Revision B.01, Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford
CT, 2010.
Å, Cu2 1.900 to 1.973 Å, Cu3 1.925 to 1.985 Å, Cu4 1.912 to
1
.995
a
Å
·2DMF·2H
for 3b·2DMF·2H
2
O. Axial Cu-O bonds for
3
2
O are Cu1 2.403 Å, Cu2 2.401 Å, Cu3 2.375 Å,
2
Cu4 2.381 Å, while that for 3b·2DMF·2H O are Cu1 2.400 Å,
Cu2 2.409 Å, Cu3 2.378 Å, Cu4 2.401 Å.
8 a) H. Astheimer, F. Nepveu, L. Walz and W. Haase, J. Chem.
Soc., Dalton Trans., 1985, 315–320; b) X. F. Yan, J.Pan, S. R.
1
Li, H. Zhou and Z. Q. Pan, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem., 2009, 635
1
,
481–1484.
9 A. C. Sousa, M. C. Oliveira, L. O. Martins and M. P. Robalo,
Green Chem., 2014, 16, 4127.
1
2
2
2
0 J. C. Freeman, P. G. Nayar, T. P. Begley and J. J. Villafranca,
Biochemistry, 1993, 32, 4826-4830.
1 a) A. Panja, Polyhedron, 2014, 79, 258–268; b) A. Panja, RSC
Adv., 2014, 4, 37085–37094.
2 a) A. Panja, Dalton Trans., 2014, 43, 7760–7770; b) A. Panja,
Polyhedron, 2014, 80, 81–89; c) A. Panja, P. Guionneau, 37 a) A. D. Becke, Phys. Rev. A, 1988, 38, 3098-3100; b) C. Lee,
Dalton Trans., 2013, 42, 5068–5075; d) A. Panja, M. Shyamal,
A. Saha, T.K. Mandal, Dalton Trans., 2014, 43, 5443–5452
W. Yang, R. G. Parr, Phys. Rev. B, 1988, 37, 785-789; c) A. D.
Becke, J. Chem. Phys,. 1993, 98, 5648-5652.
8 A. Schäfer, C. Huber, R. Ahlrichs, J. Chem. Phys., 1994, 100,
3
2
2
3 M. R. Mauryaa, S. Sikarwar, T. Joseph, S.B. Halligudi, J. Mol.
Cat., A: Chemical, 2005, 236, 132–138.
4 a) V. H. Crawford, H. W. Richardson, J. R. Wasson, D. J.
Hodgson and W. E. Hatfield, Inorg. Chem., 1976, 15, 2107-
5829-5835.
39 G. B. Bacskay, Chem. Phys., 1981, 61, 385-404.
2110; b) E. Ruiz, P. Alemany, S. Alvarez, J. Cano, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1997,119, 1297-1303.
2
5 M.Makohusova, V. Mrazova, H. Haase and R. Boca,
Polyhedron, 2014, 81, 572-582.
6 C. J. Calzado, Chem. Eur. J., 2013, 1254-1261.
7 Solvent molecules are only taken into account when they are
directly attached to the metal or involved in strong
interactions such as hydrogen bridges. Otherwise, their
effect on the calculated magnetic coupling constants could
be considered as negligible.
2
2
2
8 a) The Goodenough-Kanamori rules state that if these
magnetic orbitals are orthogonal to each other, and at the
same time have a large overlap density, the spins in the
orbitals are aligned parallel, thus producing ferromagnetic
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
J. Name., 2013, 00, 1-3 | 11
Please do not adjust margins