a
2
Table 1 The effect of reaction conditions on kinetic resolution of (R/S)-1 by Novozym using scCO flow reactor
e
1
: 2 (mol/mol)
Pressure/MPa
(S)-1 (% ee)
(R)-3 (% ee)
Conv. (%)
E
b
1
1
1
1
1
a
:0.50
13.0
13.0
12.9
8.9
89.6
98.8
w99.5
w99.5
w99.5
99.7
99.2
99.0
99.0
99.0
47
50
50
50
50
1850
1240
w1000
w1000
w1000
c
:0.60
: 1.30
d
d
:1.30
:1.30
d
20.0
21
21 b
.
Conditions: 42–43 uC, Novozym: 5.0 mL, scCO
0.070 mL min
to 3 based on the starting amount of 1.
2
flow: 1.5 mL min , flow rate of 1: 0.050 mL min
Flow rate of the mixture of 1 and 2: 0.074 mL min . Flow rate of the mixture of 1 and 2: 0.100 mL min . Conversion
Flow rate of the mixture of 1 and 2:
2
1 c
21
d
21 e
2
1
sent to the reactor at the flow rate of 0.070 mL min . The sample was
collected after 1.2 h without using any organic solvent at room temperature
and was analyzed by GC (Chirasil-DEX CB), LC (Daisel Chiralcel OJ-H),
1
and H NMR (400 MHz) without any purification. Visual inspection of the
reaction mixture in an autoclave equipped with sapphire windows showed
2
that the reactants and products were all soluble in scCO under the reaction
conditions.
1
P. G. Jessop, T. Ikariya and R. Noyori, Nature, 1994, 368, 231;
P. G. Jessop, T. Ikariya and R. Noyori, Science, 1995, 269, 1065;
P. G. Jessop, T. Ikariya and R. Noyori, Chem. Rev., 1999, 99, 475;
Chemical Synthesis Using Supercritical Fluids, eds. P. G. Jessop and
W. Leitner, Wiley–VCH, Weinheim, 1999; M. F. Sellin, I. Bach,
J. M. Webster, F. Montilla, V. Rosa, T. Aviles, M. Poliakoff and
D. J. Cole-Hamilton, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 2002, 24, 4569;
J. M. DeSimone, Science, 2002, 297, 799.
Fig. 2 The reaction profile of kinetic resolution of (R/S)-1 with Novozym in
continuous-scCO -flow reactor. (Conditions: Novozym: 5.0 mL (1.73 g),
2
21
: 2 ~ 1 : 0.6, flow rate of the mixture of 1 and 2: 0.074 mL min , scCO
flow: 1.5 mL min , 12.9–13.0 MPa, 42 uC.)
1
2
21
2
B. M. Bhanage, Y. Ikushima, M. Shirai and M. Arai, Chem. Commun.,
1999, 1277; S. Kainz, A. Brinkmann, W. Leitner and A. Pfaltz, J. Am.
(
S)-4a or 4b, respectively. Optically active acetate 5 was obtainable
Chem. Soc., 1999, 121, 6421; J. Bonilla, B. R. James and P. G. Jessop,
Chem. Commun., 2000, 941; R. A. Brown, P. Pollet, E. McKoon,
C. A. Eckert, C. L. Liotta and P. G. Jessop, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 123,
1254; D. J. Heldebrant and P. G. Jessop, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125,
5600; C. M. Gordon, Appl. Catal. A, 2001, 222, 101; A. B o¨ smann,
B. Franci o` , E. Janssen, M. Solinas, W. Leitner and P. Wasserschied,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2001, 40, 2697; M. F. Sellin and P. B. Webb,
D. J. Cole-Hamilton, Chem. Commun., 2001, 781; S. V. Dzyuba and
R. A. Bartsch, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2003, 42, 148.
in 48–50% yield and with an excellent ee (E ~ 112–137 for 4a and
over 1500 for 4b).
The present continuous asymmetric synthesis of optically active
alcohols and their derivatives with the Novozym catalyst is
characterized by a rapid and highly stereoselective transformation.
Although the batch reaction using 10 mL of the reactor, produced
0.83 mmol of optically active compounds during 7 h reaction, the
continuous-flow reactor (5 mL) gave the products at the rate of
2
2
1
21
5 mmol h (3 mL h ). Furthermore, the reaction even with a
3 A. Schmid, J. S. Dordick, B. Hauer, A. Kiener, M. Wubbolts and
B. Witholt, Nature, 2001, 409, 258; A. M. Klibanov, Nature, 2001, 409,
small excess of vinyl acetate 2 proceeded smoothly to provide the
desired product with an excellent ee, minimizing the use of
unnecessary liquid materials and the production of waste during
the reaction. This synthetic process is particularly useful for the
large-scale production of optically active alcohols. As shown in
Fig. 2, the present biocatalyst maintained its performance in terms
of the reactivity and selectivity during 3 days’ operation under a
supercritical condition (12.9–13 MPa at 42 uC) and resulted in a
quantitative transformation of (R/S)-1 (221 g) to (S)-1 with 99% ee
2
41; Enzyme catalysis in organic synthesis a comprehensive handbook, eds.
K. Drauz and H. Waldmann, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2002.
4 A. J. Mesiano, E. J. Beckman and A. J. Russell, Chem. Rev., 1999, 99, 623
and references cited therein; T. Mori, M. Funasaki, A. Kobayashi and
Y. Okahata, Chem. Commun., 2001, 1832.
5 T. Matsuda, R. Kanamaru, K. Watanabe, T. Harada and K. Nakamura,
Tetrahedron Lett., 2001, 42, 8319; T. Matsuda, R. Kanamaru,
K. Watanabe, T. Kamitanaka, T. Harada and K. Nakamura, Tetra-
hedron: Asymmetry, 2003, 14, 2087.
6 M. T. Reetz, W. Wiesenhofer, G. Francio and W. Leitner, Chem.
Commun., 2002, 992; M. T. Reetz, W. Wiesenhofer, G. Francio and
W. Leitner, Adv. Synth. Catal., 2003, 345, 1221; P. Lozano, T. D. Diego,
D. Carrie, M. Vaultier and J. L. Iborra, Chem. Commun., 2002, 692.
C.-S. Chen, Y. Fujimoto, G. Girdaukas and C. J. Sih, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1982, 104, 7294. E value was used to evaluate enantioselectivity and
9
and (R)-3 with 99% ee using 1.73 g of the immobilized enzyme.
Notes and references
7
{ Safety warning: operators of high-pressure equipment should take proper
precautions to minimize the risk of personal injury.
Experimental procedure: in a typical reaction, an immobilized lipase
s p
determined by using ee values of the substrate (ee ) and product (ee ).
8 T. Oku and T. Ikariya, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2002, 41, 3476; T. Oku,
Y. Arita, H. Tsuneki and T. Ikariya, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2004, 126,
7368.
2
1
(Novozym, 5 mL, 1.89 g, approx. 10.000 U g for propyl laurate
synthesis) was introduced to the reactor and placed in the oven. The
¯
9 Encouraged by this promising result, dynamic kinetic resolution (DKR)
is in progress in our
2
reaction temperature was increased to 42 oˆ C and the CO pressure was
21
increased to 13.0 MPa, and the flow rate was set to 1.500 mL min . Then
using both the lipase and the Ru catalyst in scCO
laboratory.
2
a mixture of 1-phenylethanol (R/S)-1 and vinyl acetate 2 (1 : 2 = 1 : 0.5) was
C h e m . C o m m u n . , 2 0 0 4 , 2 2 8 6 – 2 2 8 7
2 2 8 7