J. CHEM. RESEARCH (S), 1998 447
[
WO(O
2
)
H
2
(2-pybzim)] 2.ÐYield: 65%. (Found: C, 31.2; H, 2.1;
loss of peroxo groups, the organic moiety decomposes
further with increasing temperature. Although decomposed
fragments of the ligand could not be approximated owing to
continuous weight loss, the complete decomposition of the
ligands occurs at 0650 8C in all complexes.
�
9 3 5
N O W requires C, 31.4; H, 2.0; N, 9.2%); ꢀmax/cm
1
N, 9.3. C12
1
6
3
601 (C1N, C1C), 1017 (py ring breath), 955 (W1O), 838 (O±O),
44 (WO
65 (1120), 300 (18400); ꢂ
3
�1
�1
�1
2
antisym), 516 (WO
2
sym); ꢂmax/nm (e/dm mol cm ),
�1
2
/ꢀ cm mol ,
H
7.30±8.30 (m, aryl); L
M
4.5.
[MoO(O
N, 11.2. C12
From the physico-chemical and spectral evidence dis-
cussed above, complexes 1±4 (i.e. those obtained with a
neutral bidentate ligand) are proposed to be mononuclear
pentagonal bipyramidal (IV) while complexes 5 and 6 (i.e.
those obtained with a neutral tridentate ligand) are thought
to be trinuclear, each having a pentagonal bipyramidal
structure (V). Two dierent environments around the central
metal ion in trinuclear complexes, as proposed here, might
have caused the decomposition of its peroxo groups at
dierent temperatures and thus show a continuous loss of
peroxo groups in their thermograms. Thus the proposed
structures are supported by the thermolytic pattern. A
pentagonal structure has been con®rmed by X-ray crystallo-
graphy in diperoxo complexes of molybdenum(VI) and
2
)
2
(3-pybzim)] 3.ÐYield: 70%. (Found: C, 38.6; H, 2.6;
MoN requires C, 38.8; H, 2.4; N, 11.3%);
max/cm 1635, 1614 (C1N, C1C), 1039 (py ring breath), 958
Mo1O), 884 (O±O), 661 (MoO antisym), 564 (MoO sym);
max/nm (e/dm mol cm ), 325 (990), 298 (15400); ꢂ 7.40±8.95
H
9
3 5
O
�
1
ꢀ
(
ꢂ
(
2
2
3
�1
�1
H
�1
2
�1
m, aryl), 9.35 (s, aryl); L
2
[WO(O ) (3-pybzim)] 4.ÐYield: 60%. (Found: C, 31.5; H, 2.3; N,
9.1. C12
M
/ꢀ cm mol , 6.0.
2
�
3 5
O W requires C, 31.4; H, 2.0; N, 9.2%); ꢀmax/cm
1
H
9
N
1
(
628, 1603 (C1N, C1C), 1030 (py ring breath), 926 (W1O), 835
3
�1
O±O), 640 (WO
2
antisym), 532 (WO
2
sym); ꢂmax/nm (e/dm mol
�
1
cm ), 355 (880), 305 (14700); ꢂ 7.30±8.75 (m, aryl), 9.35 (s, aryl);
H
�1
2
�1
L
M
/ꢀ cm mol , 5.8.
{MO(O
[
2
)
2
}
3
L
2
] (M Mo or W).ÐThese complexes were pre-
pared in the same way as described above, using peroxomolybdic
acid or peroxotungstic acid (1.5 mmol) and the ligand (1 mmol).
[{MoO(O
2 2 3 2
) } (bzimpy) ] 5.ÐYield: 53%. (Found: C, 39.9; H, 2.5;
2c,7
N, 12.2. C38H26Mo N10O15 requires C, 39.6; H, 2.3; N, 12.2%);
3
tungsten(VI) having bi- and tridentate ligands.
�
1
ꢀ
(
ꢃ
(
max/cm 1625, 1596 (C1N, C1C), 1035 (py ring breath), 962
Mo1O), 877 (O±O), 652 (MoO antisym), 542 (MoO sym);
max/nm (e/dm m1 ol cm ), 335 (1230), 290 (15800); ꢂ 7.35±8.45
2
2
3
�1
2
�1
�1
H
�
m, aryl); L
{WO(O
N, 9.7. C38
M
/ꢀ cm mol , 7.2.
(bzimpy)] 6.ÐYield: 62%. (Found: C, 32.5; H, 2.1;
requires C, 32.3; H, 1.8; N, 9.9%); ꢀmax
cm 1619, 1597 (C1N, C1C), 1033 (py ring breath), 954 (W1O),
[
2 2 3
) }
H
26
N O W
10 15 3
/
�
1
3
8
35 (O±O), 648 (WO
mol 1cm ), 360 (1470), 300 (16000); ꢂ
M
L /ꢀ cm mol , 6.9.
2
antisym), 559 (WO
2
sym); ꢃmax/nm (e/dm
7.35±8.40 (m, aryl);
�
1
�1
H
� �1
2
We are thankful to the Council of Scienti®c and
Industrial Research, New Delhi 110 012 for ®nancial
support of the work.
Experimental
Received, 11th March 1998; Accepted, 14th April 1998
Paper E/8/01990H
All chemicals used were of A.R. grade. 2-(2-Pyridyl)-
benzimidazole and 2,6-bis(benzimidazol-2-yl)pyridine were prepared
by the literature methods.
1
5
References
The electronic spectra were recorded in dimethylformamide
DMF) on a Shimadzu UV-300 dual recording spectrophotometer
while IR spectra were run as Nujol mulls on a Perkin-Elmer model
(
1 H. Mimoun, The Chemistry of Peroxides, ed. S. Patai, Wiley,
New York, 1983, ch. 15.
2 (a) M. H. Gubelmann and A. F. Williams, Struct. Bonding
(Berlin), 1983, 55, 1; (b) K. A. Jorgensen, Chem. Rev., 1989, 89,
431; (c) M. H. Dickman and M. T. Pope, Chem. Rev., 1994, 94,
569.
3 M. Bonchio, V. Conte, F. Di Furio, G. Modena and S. Moro,
Inorg. Chem., 1993, 32, 5797.
4 J. T. Groves, Metal Ion Activation, ed. T. G. Spiro, Wiley, New
York, 1980, ch. 3.
5 (a) C. H. Yang, S. J. Dzugan and V. L. Goedken, J. Chem.
Soc., Chem. Commun., 1985, 1425; (b) M. R. Maurya, J. Chem.
Res. (S), 1995, 248; (c) M. R. Maurya and S. A. Bhakare,
J. Chem. Res. (S), 1996, 390; (d) M. R. Maurya and
C. Gopinathan, Indian J. Chem., 1996, 35A, 701.
6 C. Djordjevic, J. L. Gundersen and B. A. Jacobs, Polyhedron,
1989, 8, 541.
7 R. J. Cross, L. J. Farrujia, P. D. Newman, R. D. Peacock and
D. Stirling, J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans., 1996, 4149.
8 A. D. Westland, F. Haque and J. M. Bouchard, Inorg. Chem.,
1980, 19, 2255.
1
H
1
620 FT-IR spectrophotometer. The
NMR spectra were
obtained in (CD SO using Bruker WH-90 and WH-200 spec-
3 2
)
trometers. Chemical shifts (ppm) are reported relative to tetra-
methylsilane. Conductivity measurements were carried out in DMF
�
3
solutions (0.001 mol dm ) of the complexes using a Biochem model
DC-808 digital conductivity bridge calibrated with potassium
chloride solution. A laboratory built instrument was used to record
thermograms of the complexes. All measurements were carried
out in a quartz cup under a static air atmosphere.
Synthesis.Ð2-(3-pyridyl)benzimidazole (3-pybzim).Ðo-Phenylene-
diamine (2.16 g, 20 mmol) and nicotinic acid (2.46 g, 20 mmol) were
mixed in syrupy orthophosphoric acid 950 ml). The reaction mixture
was heated at 240±250 8C for 4 h with occasional shaking and
the coloured melt so obtained was poured into one litre of chilled
water with vigorous stirring. After 2 h, the brownish solid that
precipitated was collected by ®ltration. This was treated with 200 ml
of 15% sodium carbonate solution, ®ltered o and washed with
water. Finally, recrystallization from ethanol±water (3:2) resulted in
a white solid in 30% yield. (decomp. 240 8C). (Found: C, 73.6;
H, 4.7. C12
m), 7.65 (m), 8.45 (d), 8.70 (d), 9.35 (s, aryl).
MO(O
L] (M Mo or W).ÐA solution of peroxomolybdic
acid or peroxotungstic acid was prepared by stirring MoO (0.15 g,
mmol) or WO O (0.25 g, 1 mmol), respectively, in 30% H
ÁH
H
9
N
3
requires C, 73.8, H. 4.6%); ꢂ
H
13.15 (s, NH), 7.25
9 A. Syamal and M. R. Maurya, Coord. Chem. Rev., 1989, 95,
183.
(
[
2
)
2
10 D. P. Drolet, D. M. Manuta, A. J. Lees, A. D. Katnani and
G. J. Coyle, Inorg. Chim. Acta, 1988, 146, 173.
11 B. Chiswell, F. Lions and B. S. Morris, Inorg. Chem., 1964, 3,
110; S. S. Singh and C. B. S. Sengar, Indian J. Chem., 1969, 7,
812.
12 R. N. Mohanty, V. Chakravorty and K. C. Dash, Polyhedron,
1991, 10, 33.
13 C. Piguet, B. Bocquet, E. Muller and A. F. Williams, Helv.
Chim. Acta, 1989, 72, 323.
3
1
(
3
2
2 2
O
12 ml) for 15 h at 040 8C and the solution ®ltered. This solution
was added to a hot ethanolic solution (15 ml) of ligand (1 mmol)
with stirring. The reaction mixture was stirred, along with cooling
in an ice-bath. After 2 h the separated solid was ®ltered o, washed
with water±ethanol (1:3 v/v) and dried in vacuo.
[
MoO(O
2
)
2
(2-pybzim)] 1.ÐYield: 60%. (Found: C, 39.1; H, 2.7;
MoN requires C, 38.8; H, 2.4; N, 11.3%); ꢀmax
cm 1604 (C1N, C1C), 1021 (py ring breath), 1954 (Mo1O),
63 (O±O), 682 (MoO antisym), 578 (MoO sym).
N, 11.1. C12
H
9
3
O
5
/
14 C. Djordjevic, B. C. Puryear, N. Vuletic, C. J. Abelt and
S. J. Sheeld, Inorg. Chem., 1988, 27, 2926.
15 A. W. Addison and P. J. Burke, J. Heterocyl. Chem., 1981, 803.
�
1
8
2
2