September 2002
1285
tries for the molecular mechanics calculations with water solvent effects.
The molecular mechanics calculations were performed by the conjugate gra-
dient algorithm with OPLS all atom force fields20) as implemented in Macro-
Model 7.1.21) All of the calculations were carried out under the condition of
Max Iterationϭ10000 steps, Converge Thresholdϭ0.0010. Solvation was
achieved by using GB/SA solvation model22) inside MacroModel 7.1. Fur-
thermore, preliminary calculations for the formation of the intermediates in
deacylation process have been attempted by the molecular dynamics and
molecular mechanics methods.
cylation step as compared with that between g-CyD and the
corresponding D-isomer. More detailed modeling studies are
being continued in order to gain further insight into the ori-
gin of the marked enantioselectivity.
In conclusion, the remarkably high enantioselectivity
(L/Dϭ9.0) was observed for the hydrolysis (deacylation) of Z-
D(L)-Ala-PNP mediated by unmodified g-CyD for the first
time. The kinetic results on the basis of the Michaelis–
Menten principle indicate that this L-superior enantioselectiv-
ity should be mainly originated in the deacylation process of
substrates following the formation of g-CyD–substrate (1 : 1)
complexes. The computer modeling (molecular mechanics)
studies supported the L enantioselectivity on the formation of
inclusion complex with the more stable conformer of the
guest.
References and Notes
1) Ueoka R., Matsumoto Y., Moss R. A., Sugii A., Harada K., Kikuchi J.,
Murakami Y., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 110, 1588—1595 (1988).
2) Goto K., Matsumoto Y., Ueoka R., J. Org. Chem., 60, 3342—3346
(1995).
3) Ueoka R., Moss R. A., Swarup S., Matsumoto Y., Strauss G., Mu-
rakami Y., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 107, 2185—2186 (1985).
4) Ueoka R., Dozono H., Matsumoto Y., Moss R. A., Cho M., Kitahara
K., Kato Y., Chem. Pharm. Bull., 38, 219—220 (1990).
5) Tanoue O., Baba M., Tokunaga Y., Goto K., Matsumoto Y., Ueoka R.,
Tetrahedron Lett., 40, 2129—2132 (1999).
6) Ueoka R., Cho M., Matsumoto Y., Goto K., Kato Y., Harada K., Sugii
A., Tetrahedron Lett., 31, 5335—5338 (1990).
7) Matsumoto Y., Ueoka R., J. Org. Chem., 55, 5797—5799 (1990).
8) Ueoka R., Yamada E., Yamashita O., Matsumoto Y., Kato Y., Tetrahe-
dron Lett., 32, 6597—6600 (1991).
Experimental
Materials The ester substrates were prepared from N-(benzyloxycar-
bonyl)-D(or L)-amino acids by the esterification of the COOH group with p-
nitrophenol and dicyclohexylcarbodiimide as described in ref 1. These enan-
tiomeric isomers were fully characterized. Commercially available a-, b-
and g-CyDs were recrystallized from deionized water and dried in vacuum
at 40 °C for 24 h.
Kinetic Measurements Under the conditions [CyD]ϾϾ[substrate],
pseudo-first-order rate constants (kt in the presence of CyD and ks in the ab-
sence of CyD) for the deacylation of amino acid esters were evaluated from
monitoring p-nitrophenolate liberation from the esters at 400 nm. The stoi-
chiometry for the complexation of CyDs and substrates could not be con-
firmed by spectroscopic examinations (1H-NMR, UV and fluorescence mea-
surements). It was assumed that the reaction proceeds via the formation of
1 : 1 complex as shown in eq 1, and the Kb (ϭk1/kϪ1) and k2 values were de-
termined by the least-squares method from Lineweaver–Burk plots between
1/(ktϪks) and 1/[CyD] in eq 2 (correlation coefficients for the plots were
Ͼ0.994) as described in ref 16.
9) Komiyama M., Bender M. L., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 100, 4576—4579
(1978).
10) Trainor G. L., Breslow R., J. Am. Chem. Soc., 103, 154—158 (1981).
11) Ueno A., Moriwaki F., Osa T., Ikeda T., Toda F., Hattori K., Bull.
Chem. Soc. Jpn., 59, 3109—3112 (1986).
12) Kitaura Y., Bender M. L., Bioorg. Chem., 4, 237—249 (1975).
13) Ueoka R., Matsumoto Y., Harada K., Akahoshi H., Kato Y., J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 114, 8339—8340 (1992).
14) Hamasaki K., Ueno A., Chem. Lett., 1995, 859—860.
15) Ihara Y., Nakanishi E., Nango M., Koga J., Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 59,
1901—1905 (1986).
k1
k2
ks
16) Taniguchi Y., Makimoto S., Suzuki K., J. Phys. Chem., 85, 3469—
3472 (1981).
→
→
CyDϩS
CyD-S
→acyl-CyDϩ products, S
→products
kϪ1
17) Halgren T. A., J. Comp. Chem., 17, 490—519, 520—552, 553—586,
616—641 (1996).
18) Halgren T. A., Nachbar R. B., J. Comp. Chem., 17, 587—615 (1996).
19) Halgren T. A., J. Comp. Chem., 20, 720—729, 730—748 (1996).
20) Jorgensen W. L., Maxwell D. S., Tirado-Rives J., J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
118, 11225—11236 (1996).
21) Mohamadi F., Richards N. G. J., Guida W. C., Liskamp R., Lipton M.,
Caufield C., Chang G., Hendrickson T., Still W. C., J. Comput. Chem.,
11, 440—467 (1990).
22) Still W. C., Tempczyk A., Hawley R. C., Hendrickson T., J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 112, 6127—6129 (1990).
(1)
(2)
1/(ktϪks)ϭ1/(k2Ϫks)ϩ1/{Kb(k2Ϫks)[CyD]}
Calculation Method Conformer search for the structures of Z-D(L)-Ala-
PNP and the inclusion complex with g-CyD was performed on the basis of
Monte Carlo method in conjunction with MMFF17—19) molecular mechanics.
Two minimum energy conformers of Z-D(L)-Ala-PNP were found, one had a
hairpin shape with the p-nitrophenyl group located parallel to the Z group
and the other had a straight shape with the p-nitrophenyl and Z groups lo-
cated in opposite directions. These conformers of Z-D(L)-Ala-PNP were
placed in the center of the cavity of g-CyD, and the most stable structures of
the inclusion complex were searched in order to obtain the starting geome-