which the solvent was replaced by fresh dry THF (8 ml) and C60
monoadduct 1 (20 mg, 23 mmol) was added. The mixture was sonicated for
another 30 min and then heated to reflux for 3 d. Column chromatography
methanofullerene and heating to reflux for 3 d.† Under these
conditions, 1 afforded C60 in 73% yield while unchanged
starting material was recovered in 23% yield (Scheme 1).
Similarly, the C70 mono-adduct 2 provided 63% of the parent
fullerene. These yields are comparable to those obtained by the
electrochemical retro-Bingel reaction.8 Traces of as yet uni-
dentified by-products, which may provide useful information
with regard to the reaction mechanism, were detected during
chromatographic purification of the products.
(SiO2; toluene–hexane 1+1) provided 12 mg (73%) of C60
.
1 L. Isaacs, R. F. Haldimann and F. Diederich, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
Engl., 1994, 33, 2339; F. Diederich and R. Kessinger, Acc. Chem. Res.,
1999, 32, 537; F. Diederich and R. Kessinger, in Templated Organic
Synthesis, ed. F. Diederich and P. J. Stang, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim,
1999, pp. 189–218.
2 F. Cardullo, L. Isaacs, F. Diederich, J.-P. Gisselbrecht, C. Boudon and
M. Gross, Chem. Commun., 1996, 797; W. Qian and Y. Rubin, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 1999, 38, 2356.
Zn dust and the Zn/Cu couple11 are both active reducing
agents in the retro-Bingel reaction of 1, but the yields (Zn: 47%
C60, Zn/Cu: 29% C60) are lower and, particularly with pure Zn,
the amount of unidentified by-products is higher.
3 R. Schwenninger, T. Mu¨ller and B. Kra¨utler, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997,
119, 9317; I. Lamparth, C. Maichle-Mo¨ssmer and A. Hirsch, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1995, 34, 1607.
In the case of Bingel-type bis-adducts of C60, the yields were
variable (Scheme 1). In different experiments, the reduction of
the pure trans-3 and e regioisomers (±)-3 and 4, or of a mixture
of the seven known regioisomers,12 with Mg (100 equiv.)
amalgamated with 10% HgBr2 afforded between 48% C60 (and
13% mono-adduct 1) and 13% C60 (and 44% 1). These
fluctuations contrast the clean conversion (up to 75% yield) of
the bis-adducts to C60 by the electrochemical retro-Bingel
protocol,8 but the reasons for these differences are not yet
understood. Interestingly, whereas the product mixture re-
covered from the non-exhaustive electrochemical reduction of
constitutionally pure bis-adducts contained regioisomers of the
starting material resulting from an intramolecular ‘walk-on-the-
sphere’ rearrangement,13 such isomerization was not detected in
the reduction of pure (±)-3 or 4 with amalgamated Mg.
Fused pyrrolidines introduced by 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition
are among the most versatile addends in fullerene chemistry.
We therefore explored whether a bis(dialkoxycarbonyl)me-
thano addend could be removed from bis-adducts such as
(±)-514 while leaving the methaniminomethano bridge intact.
When (±)-515 was reacted for 3 d with amalgamated Mg (50
equiv.), fulleropyrrolidine 616 was isolated in 64% yield,
showing that the heterocycle is stable under the conditions of
the chemical retro-Bingel reaction. This result opens up the
possibility of using Bingel-type addends as protecting and
reversible directing groups in future syntheses of fullerene
multi-adducts that are not otherwise accessible. Investigations
along these lines are now under way.
4 Y.-Z. An, G. A. Ellis, A. L. Viado and Y. Rubin, J. Org. Chem., 1995,
60, 6353.
5 T. Da Ros, M. Prato, F. Novello, M. Maggini, M. De Amici and C. De
Micheli, Chem. Commun., 1997, 59.
6 C. Bingel, Chem. Ber., 1993, 126, 1957.
7 A. Hirsch, I. Lamparth, T. Gro¨sser and H. R. Karfunkel, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 1994, 116, 9385; M. Keshavarz-K., B. Knight, R. C. Haddon and
F. Wudl, Tetrahedron, 1996, 52, 5149; F. Arias, Y. Yang, L.
Echegoyen, Q. Lu and S. R. Wilson, in Recent Advances in the
Chemistry and Physics of Fullerenes and Related Materials, ed. K. M.
Kadish and R. S. Ruoff, The Electrochemical Society, Pennington, NJ,
1995, pp. 200–212; F. Cardullo, P. Seiler, L. Isaacs, J.-F. Nierengarten,
R. F. Haldimann, F. Diederich, T. Mordasini-Denti, W. Thiel, C.
Boudon, J.-P. Gisselbrecht and M. Gross, Helv. Chim. Acta, 1997, 80,
343.
8 R. Kessinger, J. Crassous, A. Herrmann, M. Ru¨ttimann, L. Echegoyen
and F. Diederich, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1998, 110, 1919.
9 (a) J. Crassous, J. Rivera, N. S. Fender, L. Shu, L. Echegoyen, C.
Thilgen, A. Herrmann and F. Diederich, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 1999,
38, 1613; (b) C. Boudon, J.-P. Gisselbrecht, M. Gross, A. Herrmann, M.
Ru¨ttimann, J. Crassous, F. Cardullo, L. Echegoyen and F. Diederich,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120, 7860.
10 R. D. Rieke and S. E. Bales, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1974, 96, 1775; R. D.
Rieke, Acc. Chem. Res., 1977, 10, 301.
11 The Zn/Cu couple was prepared according to: H. P. Spielmann, G.-W.
Wang, M. S. Meier and B. R. Weedon, J. Org. Chem., 1998, 63,
9865.
12 A. Hirsch, I. Lamparth and H. R. Karfunkel, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
Engl., 1994, 33, 437.
13 R. Kessinger, M. Go´mez-Lopez, C. Boudon, J.-P. Gisselbrecht, M.
Gross, L. Echegoyen and F. Diederich, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1998, 120,
8545.
Support from the Swiss National Science Foundation is
gratefully acknowledged.
14 M. Prato and M. Maggini, Acc. Chem. Res., 1998, 31, 519.
15 R. Kessinger and F. Diederich, unpublished results.
16 M. Maggini, G. Scorrano and M. Prato, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1993, 115,
9798.
Notes and references
† In a typical experiment, a mixture of Mg powder (50–150 mesh, purity
!99.8%; 14 mg, 576 mmol) and HgBr2 (20 mg, 57 mmol) (both reagents
from Fluka) was sonicated in dry THF (8 ml) for 30 min under Ar, after
Communication a909704j
336
Chem. Commun., 2000, 335–336