4934 J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 121, No. 21, 1999
Schultz and Anderson
reactions in microorganized media. In many instances, the
chemoselectivity, regioselectivity, and/or stereoselectivity of
chemical reactions can be enhanced.
Unfortunately, many of these systems suffer from various
shortcomings that limit their ultimate practicality. Sol-gel
derived (SGD) alumina exhibits many characteristics that make
it an excellent material to explore as a microorganized medium
to affect the selectivity of shape- and/or size-selective organic
reactions. Thermal stability, chemical stability, mechanical
stability, optical transparency, narrow pore size distribution,
controllable pore size, and ease of thin film and monolith
preparation are all characteristics of SGD-alumina that distin-
guish it from other microorganized media systems that, quite
often, lack one or more of these desirable features.
In recent years, the synthesis and characterization procedures
for SGD-alumina materials have been well-established. This
work has examined the various aspects of hydrolysis, gel
formation, and sintering conditions for the preparation of
supported and unsupported alumina materials with controlled
pore sizes and pore size distributions.12 Although the results of
this work have established many intricacies of SGD-alumina
processing, these studies have focused on the application of
SGD-alumina for separations and catalysis. However, the recent
development of porous SGD-alumina as an effective separation
medium and catalyst has produced a material with definitive
pore sizes and shapes that more precisely confine organic
molecules than alumina materials of the past. Earlier publications
have presented the photochemistry and photophysics of adsorbed
organic species on alumina and silica; however, the alumina
and silica used in these studies are nonporous materials in which
any effects are attributed to surface adsorption, rather than
confinement within pores.10 We report in this paper the first
application of SGD-alumina as a microorganized medium in
Figure 1. Photochemical and thermal isomerizations of D3 isomers.
which surface adsorption and confinement within pores affects
the selectivity of a chemical reaction.
To examine the effectiveness of SGD-alumina as a micro-
organized medium, we studied the photochemical selectivity of
7-dehydrocholesterol (7D) encapsulated within the porous
structure of SGD-alumina. Figure 1 shows the series of
isomerizations that occur during the photochemical production
of vitamin D (D3) from 7D. The formation of D3 begins with a
photochemically allowed conrotatory electrocyclic ring opening
of 7D yielding previtamin D3 (P3). P3 is susceptible to
conrotatory electrocyclic ring closure to 7D, conrotatory elec-
trocyclic ring closure to lumisterol3 (L3), or cis-trans isomer-
ization to tachysterol3 (T3). D3 is produced from P3 via a
thermally allowed [1,7] sigmatropic hydrogen shift. Photolysis
of 7D establishes a quasi-photostationary equilibrium between
7D, P3, T3, and L3. Comprehensive studies have established the
solution-phase photochemistry of 7D and the related isomers.13
A key characteristic of the solution-phase photochemistry of
7D is the high selectivity toward T3 at many photolysis
wavelengths.14 A tremendous amount of research effort has been
directed toward understanding the photochemical selectivity of
the vitamin D system and ultimately improving the selectivity
toward previtamin D3.
(6) (a) Lem, G.; Kaprinidis, N. A.; Schuster, D. I.; Ghatlia, N. D.; Turro,
N. J.J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 7009. (b) Ramamurthy, V.; Eaton, D.
F.; Casper, J. V. Acc Chem. Res. 1992, 25, 299. (c) Ramamurthy, V. In
Photochemistry in Organized and Constrained Media; Ramamurthy, V.,
Ed.; VCH: New York, 1991; pp 429-493. (d) Ramamurthy, V.; Corbin,
D. R.; Turro, N. J.; Zhang, Z.; Garcia-Garibay, M. A. J. Org. Chem. 1991,
56, 255-261. (e) Turro, N. J.; Cheng, C. C.; Abrams, L. Corbin, D. R. J.
Am Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 2449-2456.
(7) (a) Ogawa, M.; Kuroda, K. Chem. ReV. 1995, 95, 399-438. (b)
Thomas, J. K. Acc. Chem. Res. 1988, 21, 275-280. (c) Usami, H.; Takagi,
K.; Sawaki, Y. Chem. Lett. 1992, 1405-1408.
(8) (a) Ramamurthy, V.; Eaton, D. F. Acc. Chem. Res. 1988, 21, 300.
(b) Moorthy, J. N.; Venkatesan, K.; Wiess, R. G. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56,
6957.
(9) (a) O’Brien, M. E.; Zimmerman, H. E. J. Org. Chem. 1994, 59,
1809-1816. (b) Horie, K.; Mita, I. AdV. Polym. Aci. 1989, 88, 77. (c) Guillet,
J. Chapter 5. Polymer Photophysics and Photochemistry; Cambridge
University Press: Cambridge, England, 1985.
(10) (a) Liu, Y. S.; de Mayo, P.; Ware, W. R. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97,
5995-6001. (b) Lednev, I. K.; Mathivanan, N.; Johnston, L. J. J. Phys.
Chem. 1994, 98, 11444-11451. (c) Thomas, J. K. Chem. ReV. 1993, 93,
301-320. (d) Ford, W. E.; Kamat, P. V. J. Phys. Chem. 1989, 93, 6423-
6428. (e) Johnston, L. J. Chapter 8. In Photochemistry in Organized and
Constrained Media; Ramamurthy, V., Ed.; VCH: New York, 1991.
(11) (a) Al-Ekabi, H. In Photochemistry in Organized and Constrained
Media; Ramamurthy, V., Ed.; VCH: New York, 1991; pp 495-534. (b)
Fox, M. A. Acc. Chem. Res. 1983, 16, 314-321.
(12) (a) Yoldas, B. E. Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 1975, 54, 286-288. (b)
Yoldas, B. E. Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 1975, 54, 289-290. (c) Yoldas, B. E.
J. Mater. Sci. 1975, 10, 1856-1860. (d) Leenaars, A. F. M.; Burggraaf, A.
J. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1985, 105, 27-40. (e) Leenaars, A. F. M.; Keizer,
K.; Burggraaf, A. J. J. Mater. Sci. 1984, 19, 1077-1088. (f) Hsieh, H. P.;
Bhave, R. R.; Fleming, H. L. J. Membr. Sci. 1988, 39, 221-241. (g) Okubo,
T.; Watanabe, M.; Kusakabe, K.; Morooka, S. J. Mater. Sci. 1990, 25,
4822-4827. (h) Uhlhorn, R. J. R.; Huis In't Veld, M. H. B. J.; Keizer, K.;
Burggraaf, A. J. J. Mater. Sci. 1992, 27, 527-537. (i) Vendange, V.;
Columban, Ph. J. Mater. Res. 1996, 11, 518-528. (j) Chane-Ching, J.-Y.;
Klein, L. C. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 1988, 71, 86-90. (k) Gieselmann, M. J.
Ph.D. Thesis, University of WisconsinsMadison, 1991.
In attempts to control the selectivity of D3 formation, several
studies have examined the photochemistry of 7D in association
with various microorganized media. These studies have included
confinement of 7D within epidermal layers and synthetic
phospholipid bilayers, adsorption to silica, and via micellar
formation. Although various results have pointed toward an
attenuation of T3 formation, substantial discrepancies exist in
the photochemical product distributions.15-19 The ratio of P3/
(13) (a) Havinga, E.; Sanders, M.; Pot, J. Fortchr. Chem. Org. Natur-
stoffen 1969, 29, 131-157. (b) Verloop, A.; Koevoet, A. L.; Van
Moorselaar, R.; Havinga, E. Recueil 1959, 78, 1004-1016.
(14) (a) Havinga, E.; Jacobs, H.; Gielen, J. Tetrahedron Lett. 1981, 40,
4013-4016. (b) Dauben, W.; Phillips, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104,
5780-5781.
(15) Holick, M. F.; MacLaughlin, J. A.; Doppelt, S. H. Science 1981,
211, 590-593.
(16) (a) Moriarity, R. M.; Schwartz, R. N.; Lee, C.; Curtis, V. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 4257-4259. (b) Yamamoto, J. K.; Borch, R. F.
Biochemistry 1985, 24, 3338-3344.
(17) Terenetskaya, I. P.; Perminova, O. G.; Yeremenko, A. M. J. Mol.
Struct. 1990, 219, 359-364.
(18) Holick, M. F.; Richtand, N. M.; McNeill, S. C.; Holick, S. A.;
Frommer, J. E.; Henley, J. W.; Potts, J. T., Jr. Biochemistry 1979, 18, 1003-
1008.