Full Papers
ble, and the decrease in water may limit the caprolactone hy-
drolysis reaction and product-induced poisoning. We subse-
quently repeated the continuous experiment at the lower
H2O2/ketone ratio of 0.75, keeping all other experimental pa-
rameters, including temperature, flow rate, catalyst mass and
reactor volume, identical. A high level of stability is observed
in the oxidant-limited regime, although CyO conversion was
approximately 10% lower across the entire time period. In
terms of activity, the maximum conversion obtained was 51%,
dropping to 44% after 180 h, which represents a relative de-
crease from maximal activity of 13.7%. As such, stability is very
slightly improved in the oxidant-limited regime. This may be
due to the lower amount of water, or the slightly lower level
of conversion in this system, which leads to less 6-HHA forma-
tion. Similar improvements in caprolactone selectivity at all
overlapping ketone conversion levels were also observed in
the oxidant-limited regime, with caprolactone selectivity in-
creasing to 85% at a CyO conversion of 40%. However, given
the minimum amount of H2O required for ring opening, it is
clear that complete suppression of ring opening under these
conditions is unlikely.
converted)cmÀ3 (reactor volume)gÀ1 (catalyst)hÀ1. In addition
to being one order of magnitude more productive on a space-
time-yield basis, the continuous system is also more selective
for caprolactone at these elevated productivities (70% vs.
39%), and more selective with the H2O2 utilised, thus demon-
strating the major advantages of the continuous system.
Experimental Section
Catalyst synthesis and pre-treatment
Zeolite Al-b (Zeolyst, NH4-form, SiO2/Al2O3 =38) was dealuminated
by treatment in HNO3 solution (13m HNO3, 1008C, 20 h, 20 mLgÀ1
zeolite). The dealuminated powder was washed with water and
dried overnight at 1108C. Solid-state stannation was performed by
grinding the appropriate amount of tin(II) acetate with the neces-
sary amount of dealuminated zeolite for 10 minutes in a pestle
and mortar, prior to heat treatment in a combustion furnace (Car-
bolite MTF12/38/400). A two-stage heat treatment was employed:
to 5508C (108CminÀ1 ramp rate) first in a flow of N2 (3 h not in-
cluding ramp period) and subsequently in air (3 h) for a total of 6 h
plus heating and cooling periods. Gas flow rates of 60 mLminÀ1
were employed at all times. The sample was held horizontally in an
alumina combustion boat (10 mL capacity), and a quartz tube was
used to seal the sample environment.
Operating with less oxidant also leads to major improve-
ments in the H2O2-based selectivity of the reaction (Figure S20
in the Supporting Information). At a H2O2/ketone ratio of 0.75,
a H2O2-based selectivity (i.e., moles CyO converted/moles H2O2
consumed) of 85Æ4% was obtained, clearly indicating that
most of the peroxide is used selectivity for oxidation. In con-
trast, a maximum H2O2-based selectivity of only 57% was ob-
tained when a H2O2/ketone ratio of 1.5 was employed under
otherwise identical conditions. Clearly, decreasing the concen-
tration of H2O2 leads to noticeable improvements in H2O2 uti-
lisation, without overly compromising the BVO process itself.
Such improvements are of tremendous importance to both
process economics and the sustainability of the reaction,
particularly given the cost of H2O2.
Kinetic evaluation and analytical methods
Batch BVO reactions were performed in a 100 mL round-bottomed
flask equipped with a water-free reflux condenser. The reaction
temperature was controlled by immersion in a silicon oil bath. The
vessel was charged with a solution of cyclohexanone in 1,4-diox-
ane (10 mL, 0.33m), which also contained an internal standard (bi-
phenyl, 0.01m), and the appropriate amount of catalyst. The vessel
was subsequently heated to the desired temperature (1008C inter-
nal temperature). The reaction was initiated by addition of an ap-
propriate amount of H2O2, typically corresponding to a H2O2/
ketone ratio of 1.5. The solution was stirred at 750 rpm with an
oval magnetic stirrer bar. Aliquots of the reaction solution were
taken periodically for analysis, and were centrifuged prior to injec-
tion into a GC (Agilent 7820, 25 m CP-Wax 52 CB). Reactants were
quantified against a biphenyl internal standard. H2O2 concentra-
tions were determined by titration against Ce4+. Batch caprolac-
tone hydrolysis reactions were performed by using the same pro-
cedure and reaction conditions as used for the BVO reaction,
although cyclohexanone was replaced with caprolactone.
Conclusions
The Baeyer–Villiger oxidation of cyclohexanone by Sn-b/H2O2
was studied in batch and continuous mode, in an attempt to
understand the mechanistic aspects of the reaction, and identi-
fy its potential scalability. It is demonstrated that the BVO of
CyO by Sn-b/H2O2 is a challenging reaction, and that consecu-
tive reactions—particularly the hydrolysis of the primary capro-
lactone product—can substantially decrease the efficiency (se-
lectivity) and activity (rate) of the process. Largely, this is due
to the unavoidable formation of 6-hydroxyhexanoic acid (6-
HHA) by caprolactone hydrolysis, which leads to partial poison-
ing of the Sn-b catalyst, and also consumes the desired capro-
lactone product, decreasing the carbon-based selectivity. Opti-
mising the reaction conditions so as to minimise 6-HHA forma-
tion nevertheless shows the potential scalability of this system
in the continuous regime. Operating the reaction at conversion
levels <60%, at which point 6-HHA formation is less pro-
nounced, results in a stable catalytic system that operates for
180 h without major loss in activity, yielding a turnover
number >5000, and a volumetric productivity of 324 g(ketone
Continuous BVO reactions were performed in a home-made plug
flow, stainless steel, tubular reactor. Reactant delivery (0.33m CyO
in 1,4-dioxane, H2O2/ketone 1.5 or 0.75) was performed by an HPLC
pump. The catalyst (0.4 g) was mixed with a diluent material (SiC
(particle size of 63–75 mm), 1.6 g) to avoid back mixing and to min-
imise the pressure drop, and the bed was placed in between two
plugs of quartz wool. The diluted catalyst was densely packed into
1
a = inch stainless steel tube (4.1 mm ID), and a frit (0.5 mm) was
4
placed at the end of the bed to avoid any loss of material. A con-
tact time of 9.75 min was typically employed. The reactor tempera-
ture was controlled by immersion in a thermostatted oil bath, and
the pressure was controlled by means of a backpressure regulator.
The reaction feed was identical to that used for batch reactions.
Aliquots of the BVO reaction solutions were taken periodically
from a sampling valve placed after the reactor, and were analysed
in the same manner as the batch reactions.
&
ChemCatChem 2016, 8, 1 – 10
8
ꢀ 2016 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
ÝÝ These are not the final page numbers!