9
434
J . Org. Chem. 1996, 61, 9434-9436
O-Alk yla tion of N-P h en ylh yd r oxyla m in e in Dim eth yl Su lfoxid e
w ith Meth yla r en esu lfon a tes
K. R. Fountain,* Robert D. White, Kamlesh D. Patel, Dallas G. New, YuBo Xu, and
Aaron J . Cassely
Truman State University, Kirksville, Missouri 63501
Received August 7, 1995X
The methylation of N-phenylhydroxylamine (NPHA) with methylarenesulfonates in DMSO gives
alkylation of the O atom in contrast to methylation in methanol where N alkylation occurs. The
Hammett F values indicate that alkylations with N-methylanilines and NPHAs both involve the N
atom. The NPHAs show “nominal R-effects” but involve comparison of N atoms with O atoms.
The reactivity of the principle component, the zwitterion I, is examined with leaving group studies
and comparison with benzyl alkoxide reactivity.
N-Phenylhydroxylamine (NPHA) exists largely as the
Ta ble 1. Su m m a r y of Ra te Da ta for Meth yla tion of
Su bstitu ted N-m eth ya n ilin es a n d Su bstitu ted
N-P h en ylh yd r oxyla m in es w ith Meth yla r en esu lfon a tes in
DMSO-d 6 a t 29.5 °C
zwitterion, 1, in DMSO.1 The evidence for this statement
consists of the finding that F values for the basicity of
NPHA change from -5.69 to -1.20 when the solvent is
changed from methanol to DMSO. The corresonding
5
pKlgMe
G1
G2
X
k × 10 (SD)
Me
change in the F value for the sterically similar N-
methylanilines is -4.70 to -4.83.1 Observation of the
4-Me
4-MeO
9.95(0.05)
13.4(0.08)
2.2(0.08)
0.66(0.01)
1.25(0.1)
9.1(0.3)
0.68
4
-MeO
4-MeO
4-MeO
4-MeO
4-MeO
4-Br
prototropic shift in the spectroscopy of the NPHA mol-
ecules is also reported.1 Alkylation studies also show that
the O atom is alkylated instead of the N atom, as is the
case in methanol.2 This functionality has not been
previously investigated, so this paper reports the initial
studies on its reactivity.
H
3-Cl
4
-Cl
4-Cl
-0.74
-2.36
0.00
4
4
-Cl
-Cl
4-NO2
H
40.1 (0.0)
3.5(0.5)
4-Cl
4-Me
1.7(0.2)
0.46
4
4
-Cl
-Cl
3-NO2
4-Me, 3-NO2
9.1(0.4)
25.7(0.3)
-2.15
-1.75
OH
H
H
H
H
H
4-MeO
4-Me
H
4-Br
4-F
4-MeO
4-MeO
4-MeO
6.2(0.1)
10.0(0.1)
15.6(0.3)
38.3(0.4)
32.5(0.3)
4.12(0.5)
17.6(0.5)
0.33(0.1)
-0.33
4
4
4
-Br
-Me
-NO2
Exp er im en ta l Section
When 504 mg (4.62 mmol) of freshly prepared N-phenyl-
hydroxylamine was treated with 5.13 mmol of methyl 4-ni-
trobenzenesulfonate (4-nosylate) in 75 mL of pure DMSO
overnight a pale yellow mixture was obtained. This solution
was added to 1 M cold hydrochloric acid and extracted three
times with dichloromethane to remove most of the DMSO.
Neutralization with sodium bicarbonate solution and 3-fold
extraction with dichloromethane gave, after drying and solvent
removal, a 34% yield of O-methyl N-phenylhydroxylamine,
1
, was measured by our published kinetic method on a Varian
2
,4
XL200 NMR.
DMSO-d6
G ArNHX + CH O SArG
2
8
1
3
3
+
+
-
G ArN HMe (a) or G ArNH OCH (b) + O SArG (1)
1
2
1
2
3
3
2
having a CH
3
O signal in DMSO-d
at 2820-2810 cm
at 1150 cm as well as NO at 1260 cm (twinned with N-C
6
at 3.78 ppm and IR bands
Table 1 summarizes the results. A Hammett plot of log knuc
for methylation with methylarenesulfonate ester in DMSO,
Figure 1, shows a F value of -1.70. The corresponding plot
for N-methylanilines, also in Figure 1, shows F ) -2.10 for
-
1 3
suitable for OCH
3
3
and an OCH stretch
-
1
-1
-
1
1
for aromatic amine at 1240 cm ). Additionally, the H NMR
spectrum was extremely simple when the reaction was done
Me
this “normal” nucleophile. Figure 2 shows âlg determina-
in DMSO-d
rearranged products associated with methylation of N in
methanol-d
The reactivity of substituted NPHA and N-methylanilines
vs. substituted methylarenesulfonates in DMSO-d , reaction
6
, showing only the OMe signal, with no trace of
5
tions for both nucleophiles in DMSO-d
6
.
The substituted benzyl alcohols were used as received or
were synthesized by sodium borohydride reduction of the
6
.
6
(4) Fountain, K. R.; Fountain, D. P.; Michaels, B.; Myers, D. B.;
Salmon, J . K.; Van Galen, D. A.; Yu., P. Can. J . Chem. 1990, 69, 798.
(
5) Hoffman, R. V.; Shankweiler, J . M. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108,
*
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel.: (816) 785-
5536. McManus, S. P.; Smith, M. R.; Shankweiler, J . M.; Hoffman, R.
V. J . Org. Chem. 1988, 53, 141.
(6) Benoit, R. L.; Mackinnon, M. J .; Bergeron, L. Can. J . Chem. 1981,
59, 1501.
4
633. Fax: (816) 785-4045. E-mail: sc18@truman.edu.
X
Abstract published in Advance ACS Abstracts, December 1, 1996.
(1) Fountain, K. R.; Cassely, A. J .; New, D. G.; White, R. D.; Xu,
Y.-B. J . Phys. Org. Chem. 1995, 8, in press.
2) Fountain, K. R.; Hutchinson, L. K.; Mulhearn, D. C.; Xu, Y.-B.
J . Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 7883.
3) Bellamy, L. J . The Infra-red Spectra of Complex Molecules;
Chapman & Hall: London, 1975; p 17.
(7) (a) Decouzon, M.; Exner, O.; Gal, J . F.; Maria, P. C. J . Org. Chem.
1990, 55, 3980. (b) Bordwell, F. G.; Fried, H. E.; Hughes, D. L.; Lynch,
T.-Y.; Satish, A. V.; Whang, Y. E. J . Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 3330.
(8) Lowry, T. H.; Richardson, K. S. Mechanism and Theory in
Organic Chemistry, 3rd ed.; Harper & Row: New York, 1987; p 146.
(
(
S0022-3263(95)01448-4 CCC: $12.00 © 1996 American Chemical Society