4520
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 4520-4521
Scheme 1
Asymmetric Formation of r-Amino Acid Esters
through Dynamic Kinetic Resolution: A Cyclic
Carbonate as an Optically Active CO2 Synthon
Jon A. Tunge,† Daniel A. Gately,‡ and Jack R. Norton*,†
Department of Chemistry, Columbia UniVersity
New York, New York, 10027
Department of Chemistry, Colorado State UniVersity
Fort Collins, Colorado, 80523
ReceiVed NoVember 25, 1998
We have reported the conversion of N-aryl benzyl and
phenethylamines into R-amino acid esters utilizing ethylene
carbonate as a CO2 equivalent.1,2 Use of the optically active
ethylenebis(tetrahydroindenyl) (EBTHI) zirconium complex 1
resulted in product formation in >98% ee (Scheme 1). These
experiments revealed that the ring carbons of zirconaaziridines3
such as 2 are configurationally labile; thus, the optical purity of
the products depended on the concentration of ethylene carbonate.1b,c
The utility of the transformation in Scheme 1 is limited by the
stoichiometric use of the optically active EBTHI complex. We
now report that asymmetric induction is achieved when an
enantiopure carbonate is allowed to react with a racemic zircon-
aaziridine derived from the inexpensive Cp2ZrCl2. Cyclic carbon-
ates with C2 symmetry4 are attractive as optically active CO2
synthons because the required vicinal diols are available in high
yield and optical purity from the Sharpless dihydroxylation.5 For
our initial investigation we have used 1,2-diphenylethylene
carbonate (5), because both enantiomers of the corresponding diol
are easily prepared on a kilogram scale5b and are commercially
available.
The stereochemical outcome of Scheme 2 will be determined
by Curtin-Hammett kinetic considerations similar to those
previously applied1b to Scheme 1. The kinetic system in Scheme
2 displays two well-defined boundaries. If (a) the two enantiomers
(R)-6 and (S)-6 are not converting on the time scale of the insertion
(i.e., kS[5], kR[5] . kinv), the reaction can be run as a kinetic
resolution. However, the yield of optically pure product is limited
to 50%, and the enantiomeric purity of the product is greatly
affected by the extent of conversion. If (b) the enantiomers are
rapidly interconverting relative to insertion (i.e., kS[5], kR[5] ,
kinv), the reaction can be run to 100% conversion, and the product
Scheme 2
ratio will equal the relative rates of insertion. The latter extreme
(condition b) is termed a dynamic kinetic resolution (DKR)6 and
avoids limitations on yield and conversion.
We have determined the configurational lability, necessary for
DKR, of the ring carbons in zirconaaziridines derived from Cp2-
ZrCl2. To obtain a diastereoexcess from treatment of a racemic
mixture with a stoichiometric amount of an optically active
reagent, the enantiomers of the racemate must not only intercon-
vert but also react at different rates.7 The insertion of 5 into the
racemic zirconaaziridines 6 is such a case. Addition of 1.2 equiv
of 5 to 6a in C6D6 at room temperature resulted in a 24% de.
Repeating this experiment with 6b gave 7b in 25% de, indicating
that epimerization was competitive with insertion.
A Curtin-Hammett kinetic analysis8 shows that, at low
conversion, the product ratio R-7/S-7 will be equal to kR/kS. This
ratio, termed the selectivity factor s, can be more accurately
determined with the use of a test developed by Hoffmann.7 When
a racemic zirconaaziridine is treated with a racemic C2 symmetric
carbonate, the ratio of diastereomeric products is equal to kR/kS
(Scheme 3). Thus, when 6a is allowed to react with racemic 5,
the de is 76%, indicating an s of 7.3. When 6b is treated in the
same manner, the de is 90%, indicating a rate constant ratio s of
19. The data in Table 1 show that the diastereodifferentiation is
good for zirconaaziridines with aromatic substituents. Importantly,
this test is independent of the rate of epimerization of the
zirconaaziridine.
In order for DKR to be possible, inversion at the ring carbon
must be much faster than insertion. Unfortunately, when 5 is
added all at once to 6 at room temperature the maximum
selectivity is not realized. For example, rapid addition of 5 to 6b
provides the product metallacycle in only 22% de.
However, insertion can be kept much slower than epimerization
if 5 is added to 6 slowly via syringe pump. Thus, syringe pump
addition of a solution of 5 to 6b over the period of 4 h forms the
product metallacycle 7b in 90% de at 100% conversion. The same
experiment repeated with 6a results in a 76% de. As Table 2
†Columbia University.
‡ Colorado State University.
(1) (a) Gately, D. A.; Norton, J. R.; Goodson, P. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1995, 117, 986-996. (b) Gately, D. A.; Norton, J. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996,
118, 3479-3489. (c) The configurational lability of zirconaaziridines was first
noted by the Buchwald group in their initial investigation of these reagents:
Grossman, R. B. Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
Cambridge, MA, 1991.
(2) For other examples of R-carboxylation of amines, see: Faibish, N. C.;
Park, Y. S.; Lee, S.; Beak, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 11561-11570.
Beak, P.; Basu, A.; Gallagher, D. J.; Park, Y. S.; Thayumanavan, S. Acc.
Chem. Res. 1996, 29, 552-560.
(3) Buchwald, S. L.; Watson, B. T.; Wannamaker, M. W.; Dewan, J. C. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 4486-4494. Grossman, R. B.; Davis, W. M.;
Buchwald, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 2321-2322. Coles, N.; Whitby,
R. J.; Blagg, J. Synlett 1992, 2, 143-145. Harris, M. C. J.; Whitby, R. J.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1994, 35, 2431-2434. Harris, R. J.; Whitby, R. J.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1995, 36, 4287-4290. Jensen, M.; Livinghouse, T. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 4495-4496. Ito, H.; Taguchi, T.; Hanzawa, Y.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1992, 33, 4469-4472. Honda, T.; Satoh, S.; Mori, M.
Organometallics 1995, 14, 1548-1550. Scott, M. J.; Lippard, S. J. Organo-
metallics 1997, 16, 5857-5868. Gianni, L.; Caselli, A.; Solari, E.; Floriani,
C.; ChiesiVilla, A.; Rizzoli, C.; Re, N.; Sgamellotti, A. J. Am. Chem. Soc.
1997, 119, 9709-9719. Barluenga, J.; Sanz, R.; Fananas, J. J. Org. Chem.
1997, 62, 5953-5958.
(6) (a) Noyori, R.; Tokunaga, M.; Kitamura, M. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1995,
68, 36-55. (b) Ward, R. S. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 1995, 6, 1475-1490.
(c) Caddick, S.; Jenkins, K. Chem. Soc. ReV. 1996, 25, 447-456. (d) Strecher,
H.; Faber, K. Synthesis 1997, 1, 1-16.
(7) Hirsch, R.; Hoffmann, R. W. Chem. Ber. 1995, 125, 975-982.
(8) (a) Seeman, J. I. Chem. ReV. 1983, 83, 83-134. (b) Eliel, E. L.; Wilen,
S. H. Stereochemistry of Organic Compounds; John Wiley and Sons: New
York, 1994; pp 648-655. (c) Carey, F. A.; Sundberg, R. J. AdVanced Organic
Chemistry, 3rd ed.; Plenum: New York, 1990; pp 215-216.
(4) Whitesell, J. K. Chem. ReV. 1989, 89, 1581.
(5) (a) Kolb, H. C.; van Nieuwenhze, M. S.; Sharpless, K. B. Chem. ReV.
1994, 94, 2483-2547. (b) Wang, Z.-M.; Sharpless, K. B. J. Org. Chem. 1994,
59, 8302-8303.
10.1021/ja984061x CCC: $18.00 © 1999 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 04/27/1999