Page 3 of 5
J oP ul er na as el od f oM na ot et rai ad lj su Cs th me ma ri gs ti nr ys A
DOI: 10.1039/C8TA03974G
Journal Name
apparent NH
COMMUNICATION
1
was detected (Fig. S6 and S7). N isotopic form *NNH
5
3
3
, the steps become downhill in free energy.
labeling experiment was performed as an alternative method Because of the hydrogen bond with the adjacent O atoms, the
to verify the NH originated from N in 0.1 M HCl electrolyte *NNH group prefers to locate the hollow position (structure
Fig. S8). The H NMR spectra identified the obtained a doublet c). Nevertheless, release of the first ammonia molecule meets
3
2
3
1
(
1
5
+ 5
15
+
coupling for
NH
4
.
Only
-saturated electrolyte. These results change of 2.25 eV for the process of from *NNH
in the electrolyte was indeed generated the adsorbed N atom moves back to the top site of the Mo
reduction by MoO /GCE. We also atom with the bond length of 2.89 (structure d).
NH
4
was observed after the potential determining step with the largest free energy
1
5
electrolysis in the
confirm that the NH
N
2
3
to *N, where
3
via electrocatalytic N
2
3
Å
investigated the catalytic ability of bare GCE. Obviously, bare Subsequently, the following reduction processes are exergonic
GCE has low activity for the NRR (Fig. S9). Furthermore, No steps.
N
2
H
4
was detected, indicating MoO
selectivity (Fig. S10).
Stability is another critical parameter to evaluate the excellent selectivity at ambient conditions. It achieves a NH
3
/GCE possesses excellent
In summary, MoO
3
nanosheet is proved as an efficient non-
noble-metal electrocatalyst for artifical N
2
fixation to NH with
3
3
–
10
–1
–2
–1
–1
performance of catalysts. Under sustained N gas flowing, 24-h yield of 4.80×10 mol s cm (29.43 µg h mg cat.) and a FE of
2
electrolysis at –0.40 V only leads to a slight decrease in current 1.9%, with high electrochemical stability and durability. DFT
density (Fig. S11), confirming its strong stability. After NRR for calculations reveal that the outmost Mo atoms act as the
24 h, the NH yield rate only shows a slight decrease compared active sites for effective N2 adsorption. This study not only
3
with those after
2 h electrolysis (Fig. S12), suggesting offers us an attractive earth-abundant catalyst material for
MoO /GCE still exhibit effective catalysis after long-term NRR. electrochemical NH3 synthesis, but would open exciting new
3
Consecutive recycling tests (Fig. 3b) were conducted at –0.40 avenues to the rational design of Mo oxides-based
V, showing almost no variation in NH3 yields and FEs, which nanocatalysts with enhanced performances for applications.
indicate high stability of MoO /GCE. Fig. 3c shows the long-
3
term electrolysis at different potentials in N -saturated 0.1 M
2
Acknowledgements This work was supported by the National
HCl solution, indicating high durability of MoO /GCE. By
3
Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21575137).
varying the N flow rate, NH yield and FE at –0.40 V are also
2
3
steady without any apparent change (Fig. 3d), suggesting that
the N diffusion is a non-rate-determining step.
2
References
1
2
R. F. Service, Science, 2014, 345, 610.
K. A. Brown, D. F. Harris, M. B. Wilker, A. Rasmussen, N.
Khadka, H. Hamby, S. Keable, G. Dukovic, J. W. Peters, L. C.
Seefeldt and P. W. King, Science, 2016, 352, 448–450.
G. Ertl, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 3524–3535.
K. Honkala, A. Hellman, I. N. Remediakis, A. Logadottir, A.
Carlsson, S. Dahl, C. H. Christensen and J. K. Nørskov,
Science, 2005, 307, 555–558.
3
4
5
6
7
G. Chen, X. Cao, S. Wu, X. Zeng, L. Ding, M. Zhu and H.
Wang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2017, 139, 9771–9774.
H. K. Lee, C. S. L. Koh, Y. H. Lee, C. Liu, I. Y. Phang, X. Han, C.
K. Tsung and X. Ling, Sci. Adv., 2018,
C. J. M. Van der Ham, M. T. M. Koper and D. G. H.
Hetterscheid, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2014, 43, 5183–5191.
P. J. Chirik, Nat. Chem., 2009, , 520–522.
M. A. Shipman and M. D. Symes, Catal. Today, 2017, 286
7–68.
0 C. Guo, J. Ran, A. Vasileff and S. Qiao, Energy Environ. Sci.,
018, 11, 45–56.
4, eaar3208.
8
9
1
,
5
1
1
1
1
2
1 Z. W. Seh, J. Kibsgaard, C. F. Dickens, I. Chorkendorff, J. K.
Nørskov and T. F. Jaramillo, Science, 2017, 355, eaad4998.
2 M. Shi, D. Bao, B. R. Wulan, Y. Li, Y. Zhang, J. Yan and Q.
Jiang, Adv. Mater., 2017, 29, 1606550.
3 D. Bao, Q. Zhang, F. Meng, H. Zhong, M. Shi, Y. Zhang, J.
Yan, Q. Jiang and X. Zhang, Adv. Mater., 2017, 29, 1604799.
Fig. 4. Free energy profile for NRR process. An asterisk (*) denotes as the adsorption
2 2 3
site. The structures of a, b, c, and d are the structures of *N , *N H, *NNH , and *N,
respectively.
The NRR process on catalyst was proposed as hydrogenation
of the adsorbed N
shows the free energy profile of the NRR on MoO
beginning, an intact N molecule is physically adsorbed on the
top of the outmost Mo atom (structure a) with an adsorption
energy of –0.08 eV and the length of 2.97 for the N-Mo
bond. The addition of the first hydrogen atom is to form *N
structure b), which is uphill in free energy with the energy 18 H. Brod and F. Tuczek, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2014, 53
2
molecule by adding H atom one by one. Fig. 14 K. Kugler, M. Luhn, J. A. Schramm, K. Rahimi and M.
. At the
Wessling, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2015, 17, 3768–3782.
5 H. Liu, S. Han, Y. Zhao, Y. Zhu, X. Tian, J. Jiang, B. Xia and Y.
Chen, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2018,
, 3211−3217.
6 B. M. Hoffman, D. R. Dean and L. C. Seefeldt, Acc. Chem.
Res., 2009, 42, 609–619.
17 D. V. Yandulov and R. R. Schrock, Science, 2003, 301, 76–78.
4
3
1
1
2
6
Å
2
H
(
,
6
32–634.
change of 2.12 eV. As addition of other two hydrogen atoms to
1
9 R. R. Eady, Chem. Rev., 1996, 96, 3013–3030.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
J. Name., 2013, 00, 1-3 | 3
Please do not adjust margins