Enhanced grain refinement of in situ CeB6/Al composite inoculant on pure aluminum by microstructure control

Article abstract of DOI:10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.01.188

In situ CeB₆/Al composite has been proven to be an effective refiner for commercial pure aluminum, however, it remains unclear as to the mechanisms of synthesis and grain refinement. We use low-temperature alloying and high-speed melt spinning

Full text of DOI:10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.01.188

Accepted Manuscript
Enhanced grain refinement of in situ CeB /Al composite inoculant on pure aluminum
6
by microstructure control
Shuiqing Liu, Xin Wang, Chunxiang Cui, LiChen Zhao, Nuo Li, Zhe Zhang, Jinhua
Ding, Denghao Sha
PII:
S0925-8388(17)30205-0
10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.01.188
JALCOM 40555
DOI:
Reference:
To appear in: Journal of Alloys and Compounds
Received Date: 24 September 2016
Revised Date: 7 January 2017
Accepted Date: 18 January 2017
Please cite this article as: S. Liu, X. Wang, C. Cui, L. Zhao, N. Li, Z. Zhang, J. Ding, D. Sha, Enhanced
grain refinement of in situ CeB /Al composite inoculant on pure aluminum by microstructure control,
6
Journal of Alloys and Compounds (2017), doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.01.188.
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to
our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo
copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please
note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all
legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Enhanced grain refinement of in situ CeB6/Al composite inoculant on pure aluminum by
microstructure control
Shuiqing Liu, Xin Wang, Chunxiang Cui*, LiChen Zhao
Denghao Sha
, Nuo Li, Zhe Zhang, Jinhua Ding,
Key Lab. for New Type of Functional Materials in Hebei Province, School of Materials Science and
Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300130, P. R. China
*To whom all correspondence should be addressed: Tel: +86-022-26564125, Fax: +86-022-60204125;
Email: hutcui@hebut.edu.cn
Abstract
In situ CeB6/Al composite has been proven to be an effective refiner for commercial pure
aluminum, however, it remains unclear as to the mechanisms of synthesis and grain refinement. We use
low-temperature alloying and high-speed melt spinning to optimize the microstructure of CeB6. It is
found that in situ CeB6/Al composite shows controllable microstructure and its refining effect is
obviously dependent on the size of CeB6 particle/cluster. As nano-CeB6 particles self-assemble into
submicron clusters, the inoculant shows significantly enhanced refining effect, reducing the grain size
of pure aluminum to ~110 ꢀm. The refining mechanism is attributed to the combining effect of the
cluster structure in submicron scale and the excellent crystallography matching relationship of CeB6
and Al. Mechanical properties of pure aluminum are also improved by addition of in situ CeB6/Al
composite inoculant due to collaboration effect of dispersion strengthening and grain refining
strengthening.
Keywords: Aluminum alloys; Cerium hexaboride; Rapid solidification; Grain refinement;
Mechanical properties; Inoculation mechanism;
1

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1. Introduction
Inoculation is a common industrial technology in the field of metallurgy, which has been widely
applied in aluminum alloys for almost 100 years [1-3]. By minute quantities of refiner (~0.5%) that
added to the melt prior to solidification, inoculation can significantly reduce the grain size of metals,
and in turn improve the mechanical properties. In the past decades, there has been increased interest in
the development of new inoculants for aluminum alloys [4, 5]. From the first modern refiner Al-Ti
alloy [6], Al-Ti-B intermediate alloys were successfully developed and applied in many cast alloys [7].
However, with the development of aluminum alloys, Al-Ti-B refiner shows limitations for Al-Si based
alloys with high Si content or under certain conditions (i.e. poisoning) [8, 9]. Further studies on
alloying of Al-Ti alloys were carried on, resulting in the discovery of some new refiners such as
Al-Ti-C [10], Al-Ti-C-B [8] and Al-Ti-B-Re [11]. In addition, other binary alloys free of titanium were
also developed for refining aluminum alloys, which includes Al-Sc [12], Al-Zr [13], Al-Sr [14], Al-Y
[15], Al-Ce/La [16] and so on. Recently, some borides except TiB2 such as NbB2 [17, 18], LaB6 [19]
and CeB6 [20], were also found to be potential refiners for aluminum alloys. However, it remains
unclear as to the physical and chemical behavior of the borides in aluminum melt, and the
corresponding grain refinement mechanism should be clarified.
Refiner particle provides the nucleant substrate for heterogeneous nucleation of aluminum and
plays an important role for grain refinement of aluminum alloys. In general, the refining efficiency of a
refiner is strongly affected by the distribution, size, surface status of the particle and degree of super
cooling. Greer et al indicated that the refining effect of Al-Ti-B inoculant is increased with the
decreased size of TiB2 particle, and the optimum size is ~2 ꢀm [21]. If the size of TiB2 particles were
very small (< 1 ꢀm), heterogeneous nucleation just occur under a large/deep degree of super cooling
2

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
[21]. Later in 2004, Quested and Greer developed their theory based on TiC and TiB2 particles and
indicated that the best particle size range is 300-500 nm [22]. Meanwhile, we also found that AlN
particle possesses the best refining effect with a size of ~400 nm in an earlier work [23]. The optimum
size of AlN particle accords with Greer’ model and is in sub-micron scale. It is suggested that the
crystal growing behavior at sub-micron is very important for aluminum alloys.
Aimed at improving the inoculation efficiency, many technologies have been used, including
chemical modification [24], rapid solidification [25-29], ultrasonic processing [30, 31] and so on. Melt
spinning is a typical rapid solidification method and has been used in preparation of inoculant due to
many benefits such as chemical homogeneity and large solid solubility [32]. In particular, the
secondary phases in aluminum alloys could be significantly refined under large degree of super cooling
caused by high cooling rate [33-36]. For example, when the cooling rate of Al-Si alloy exceeded ~106
K/s, the size of primary silicon could be reduced to nano-scale [37, 38]. Under this strategy, we used
melt-spinning to prepare an in situ CeB6/Al inoculant and the size of CeB6 particle was controlled to >1
ꢀm [20]. However, the rotating speed of melt spinning in the previous work [20] was limited (3000 rpm)
and the corresponding cooling rate was relatively low. It is necessary to investigate the effect of higher
rotating speed on microstructure control of CeB6/Al inoculant. Moreover, it remains unknown that
whether the inoculant is effective as the CeB6 particle size is reduced to submicron-scale or nano-scale.
In the present work, the CeB6/Al composite inoculant was treated by melt spinning with different
cooling rates for reducing the size of CeB6 particle. A melt-spinning equipment with a high rotating
speed up to 10000 rpm was used. The microstructure evolution of the refiner in the process of synthesis,
controlling and inoculation was investigated in turn. The grain refinement mechanism was also
discussed based on a cluster-swallowing model.
3

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Low-temperature preparation
Al-Ce alloy and Al-B alloy were used as raw materials to fabricate the refiner. According to the
binary phase diagram as shown in Fig. 1 [39], Al-3B (all compositions quoted in this work are in wt.%
unless otherwise stated) and Al-20Ce are both in liquid status at a temperature ~1200 K. It indicates
that they are easy to melt and this is beneficial for the fabrication of master alloy. Therefore,
commercial Al-20Ce and Al-3B alloys were used to prepare the Al-Ce-B master alloy with a nominal
composition of Al-4.8Ce-2.3B (Al93Ce1B6 in at %, denoted as C0 alloy). For low-temperature melting,
induction melting (High frequency power,10 KW) was used under real-time monitoring by a double
color infrared laser thermometer, and the reaction temperature was controlled to be about 1300 K. Then
the master alloy was re-melted by induction melting (Middle frequency power, 40 KW) and the
obtained melt was blew to the surface of a copper roller with a diameter of 22 cm to prepare the
CeB6/Al ribbons. The rotating speed of the copper roller was set as 2000 rpm, 4000 rpm and 8000 rpm,
respectively (the obtained ribbons are denoted as C1 , C2 and C3, respectively).
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM, S4800) was used to examine the three-dimensional (3D)
morphologies of the refiner particles that were extracted from the ribbons by dilute hydrochloric acid,
following the program detailed in reference [40]. The phase structure was confirmed by X-ray
diffraction (XRD, Bruker D8 Discover) with Cu Kα radiation. The phase composition was examined
by energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS). The thermal stability of melt-spun sample was analyzed by
differential scanning calorimetric (DSC, SDT/Q600).
2.2. Grain refining effect estimation
The CeB6/Al ribbons prepared with different rotating speed were used as inoculants and added
4

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
into aluminum melt at 993 K (720 ℃). The addition amount of inoculants was about 0.4% of the total
weight of aluminum melt. We have proven that CeB6/Al ribbon has the best refining effect with this
amount of addition in previous work [20]. The melt was stirred for 10 s and then poured into a steel
mold with a cavity of 20 mm in diameter and 120 mm in height. The specimens for metallographic
examination were cut from the middle part of the as-cast rod and carefully grinded by sandpaper. After
mechanical polishing, the specimens were etched in 0.5% HF solution for macroscopic observation.
Next,
the
specimens
were
re-polished
and
etched
with
Poulton’s
reagent
(60%HCl+30%HNO3+5%HF+5%H2O) for microscopic observation by optical microscopy (OM,
Olympus). The grain size of each sample was examined by intercept method according to ASTM
standard E112 [41]. Tensile mechanical test was performed on a WDW-100 KN material test machine
following ASTM B557M-02 standard [42]. The microstructure of refiner particles was examined by
High-Resolution Transmission Electron Microscopy (HRTEM, JEOL 2000FX).
3. Results
3.1. Low-temperature synthesis
Fig. 2 shows the typical XRD spectrum of Al-Ce-B master alloy (C0). It is clear that the spectrum
has two groups of sharp diffraction peaks corresponding to α-Al and CeB6, respectively. It is suggested
that the CeB6 phase has been fabricated in the melt at a temperature much lower than its melting point.
In addition, some weak peaks of Al11Ce3 are also detected as shown in the inset of Fig.2. It indicates
that the actual ratio of Ce:B is a little higher than 1:6 and the volatilizing of Ce is not obvious. In
general, the melting of aluminum alloys with Ce-rich is accompanied by volatilizing of Ce. As the
melting temperature is increased, the amount of volatilization is increased. The synthesis temperature
in this case (1300 K) is much lower than the boiling point of Ce (3699 K [43]), which is beneficial for
5

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
reducing the volatilization of rare-earth elements.
Fig. 3 shows the SEM image and chemical composition of alloy C0. As shown in Fig. 3a, there are
many white particles with different sizes on the α-Al matrix. The particles are aggregated in the melt
due to interfacial tension, resulting in the heterogeneous distribution of particles in the matrix. In
high-magnification SEM image as displayed in Fig. 3b, some of the white phases show small plane
characteristics (Marked by B) and some particles show short rod-like morphology (Marked by A).
According to the EDS results shown in Fig.3c and 3d, particle B can be speculated as cerium boride
phase owing to a high Ce-B content; particle A might be some Al-Ce intermetallic. In combining
consideration of the phase-diagram (see Fig. 1), EDS data (Fig. 3) and XRD results (see Fig. 2), the
cerium boride (A) and Al-Ce intermetallic (B) can be confirmed as CeB6 and Al11Ce3, respectively.
Fig. 3e shows the 3D morphologies of the CeB6 particles in C0 alloy. In general, CeB6 particles
show cubic shape and smaller particles are incline to combine bigger clusters with many zigzag steps.
In particular, the small CeB6 cubes in a cluster have similar orientation. It is strongly suggested that big
clusters are actually assembled by small particles (so called self-assembled). This phenomenon is in
accordance with that of sub-micron CeB6 particles synthesized by sintering of CeO and B2O3 [44]. In
our opinion, the growth of CeB6 particles in Al melt is similar with that of sintering method. During
self-assembling, nano-CeB6 particles with similar crystalline orientation would connect together and
combine into a bigger particle/cluster. The self-assembled particle/cluster can self-assemble again and
grows into big cluster step-by-step. As a result, CeB6 can grow into some very big particles/clusters
with a size of ~100 ꢀm. For example, Fig. 3f shows a hexagonal particle composited of many small
particles.
3.2. Microstructure control
6

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Fig. 4 shows the optical pictures of the cross-section surface of the melt-spun CeB6/Al ribbons
with different rotating speeds. The thickness of C1, C2 and C3 alloy is about 132 ꢀm, 42 ꢀm and 12
ꢀm, respectively. As well known, the thickness of melt-spun ribbon is related to the cooling rate of the
melt during solidification. According to the method proposed in references [37,38], the average cooling
rates of ribbon C1, C2 and C3 can be calculated as 4.59×105 K/s, 1.14×107 K/s and 1.58×108 K/s,
respectively.
Fig. 5 shows the XRD spectra of the ribbon samples. All the XRD spectra have typical peaks of
α-Al、Al11Ce3 and CeB6 phase. It is demonstrated that the phase composition of the alloy is not
obviously changed by melt spinning. However, it should be noted that the major peak of Al11Ce3 phase
is weakening with the increased cooling rate. It is suggested that the formation of Al11Ce3 phase is
inhibited to some extent due to fast solidification.
Fig. 6 shows the SEM images of the CeB6/Al ribbons with different cooling rates. For alloy C1,
the size of the particles is in a range of 0.5-13.5 ꢀm and the particles are inclined to agglomerate to big
clusters as shown in Fig. 7a. As the cooling rate is increased to ~107 K/s (alloy C2), the size of the
CeB6 particles is reduced to 0.5-7 ꢀm as shown in Fig. 7b. Furthermore, when the cooling rate is
increased to ~108 K/s (alloy C3), the size of CeB6 particles is reduced to ~80 nm as shown in Fig. 7c. It
is demonstrated that the size of CeB6 particles is strongly dependent on the cooling rate. As well known,
the degree of supper cooling is increased with cooling rate, which in turn causes improved nucleation
rate or refining effect [21]. For similar reason, CeB6 particle can also be refined such that C3 has the
narrowest spreading size of particles. In addition, CeB6 particles in C3 homogeneously distributes on
the matrix. This also is attributed to the applied high cooling rate, which suppresses the settlement and
aggregation of nano particles [45]. It should be noted that the nano-CeB6 particles are not separately
7

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
distributed; in fact, they are also organized into small clusters with a size of ~300 nm as shown in the
inset of Fig. 6c. To sum up, it indicates that melt-spinning is an effective method to control the
microstructure of in situ CeB6/Al alloy.
It is also worth noting that Fig. 6 shows the two-dimensional (2D) morphology of the CeB6
particles on the surface of ribbons. All the particles are wrapped by Al matrix, thus the 3D
morphology/size of CeB6 particles cannot be clearly observed. In order to know the actual size of the
particles rather than some sections of them, we extracted the ribbons and obtained the 3D morphology
as shown in Fig. 8. It can be found that the actual 3D sizes of the CeB6 particles are comparable to that
of the 2D image. It is also in accordance with the result shown in Fig. 7.
3.3 Grain refining effect examination
Fig. 9 shows the macro/micro metallographic images of the Al samples refined by alloy C1, C2
and C3, respectively. The macro metallographic images indicate that all the samples are free of
columnar grain as shown in Fig. 9a-d. Meanwhile, the grain size of the sample is significantly
decreased with the increased cooling rate of ribbon, as shown in Fig. 9e-h. By adding C1 and C2 alloy,
the grain of pure Al with size of ~ 820 ꢀm is obviously refined into small grain with ~ 260 ꢀm and ~
195 ꢀm, respectively. In particular, the grain size of pure Al is reduced to ~110 ꢀm after refinement
with alloy C3. This refined grain size is smaller by 30% than that of previous work [20]. Therefore, it is
demonstrated that the grain refining efficiency of CeB6/Al ribbon is greatly improved by the high-speed
melt-spinning treatment.
Fig.10 shows the mechanical properties of the samples after inoculation. The mechanical
properties of Al samples have been enhanced by grain refinement. After refining by alloy C3, the
tensile strength and yield strength of the Al samples are 115.7 MPa and 71.8 MPa, respectively. In
8

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
comparison with pure aluminum without inoculation, the strength values are increased by 1.75 times
and 1.47 times. Moreover, the elongation of the sample inoculated by alloy C3 is still good.
The enhancement of strengthening effect is mainly resulted from the following two aspects. The
first, according to the Hall-Petch theory, grain refinement could improve the toughness and strength of
metallic matrix [46]. If the grain size were finer, the amount of grain boundaries turns more, resulting
in an enhanced grain boundary strengthening [47]. The second, according to the dispersion
strengthening theory, the homogeneously distributed ceramic particles can pin the motion of
dislocations, leading to the increased deforming resistance [48, 49]. Under the combining effect of
above two aspects, the strength and elongation of the Al samples are obviously improved by the
inoculation treatment.
3.4 Identification of nucleant particles
Fig. 11 shows the TEM image of a typical cluster in alloy C3, which indicates that the size of the
cluster is about 128 nm. The cluster is composed of several particles less than 100 nm as shown in Fig.
11a. Meanwhile, no obvious grain boundary can be found, which indicates that the cluster is an
intracrystalline one. Fig. 11b shows the electron diffraction pattern of this cluster. Interestingly, some of
the electron diffraction spots (marked by dotted rectangles in Fig. 11b) are actually composed of two or
three spots next to each other. It is demonstrated that the cluster is assembled by several particles with
similar crystallographic orientation. For a clearer observation, the inverting image of Fig. 11b is shown
in Fig. 11c and the diffraction spots are connected by lines. Based on the diffraction result, the cluster
can be confirmed as CeB6, which is in accordance with the XRD results shown in Fig. 5.
Fig. 12 shows the TEM image of the as-cast aluminum alloy after inoculation by alloy C3. It is
found that the size of the dispersion particles is about 5 nm which is much smaller than that in
9

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
inoculant ribbons (~100 nm). Fig. 12b shows the HRTEM image of the particle marked by A in Fig.
12a. The interplanar crystal spacing d can be measured from Fig. 12b as following: d(111) =0.2391 nm
and d(200) =0.2070 nm, which is equal to the corresponding values of CeB6 (X-ray crystallology card
number 38-1455, 0.23900 nm and 0.20698 nm, respectively). Meanwhile, the angle between the (111)
plane and the (200) plane is measured to be about 54°76′, which is very closed to the theoretical value
of CeB6 (54°73′, based on crystallography calculation [43]). Therefore, this precipitate phase could be
confirmed as CeB6. In addition, the crystal orientation of these nano CeB6 particles is almost the same,
which implies that they are divided from (or belong to) one bigger particle/cluster.
4. Discussion
Size-effect of refiner particle, which was presented by Greer et al, is the basis for microstructure
control/optimization of inoculants in present work. Greer indicated that the most favorable size range
of particles is about 0.3-0.5 ꢀm [22]. In this work, the size of CeB6 particle in alloy C3 is only 50-100
nm (see Fig. 6c and Fig. 11a) and the refining effect is also significant. It is worthy of noticing that,
several nano CeB6 particles generally unites to clusters in a range of 50-200 nm as shown in Fig. 7c
(Measured from 2D image). In consideration of 3D space, the actual size of clusters must be a little
large, which is in a sub-micron scale and closed to the ideal size range 0.3-0.5 ꢀm. Moreover, alloy C3
almost contains no big cluster over 1 ꢀm, which rules out the negative effect of larger particles on
nucleation events. As it was known, larger particles motivate the nucleation first due to the small
undercooling needed [22]. Then, the temperature of the melt around big particles will be increased by
the recalescence of the first nucleation events, resulting in that smaller particles become inactive due to
the decreased undercooling. This reduces the number efficiency of inoculants and efficiency of the
master alloy. In the present work, C1 has the widest size range of particles and C3 got minimum.
10

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Therefore, the improved efficiency of in situ CeB6/Al composite inoculants can be attributed to the
reduced size spreading of the particles in C3 ribbons.
After adding in Al melt during the inoculation treatment, the sub-micron CeB6 clusters in C3 are
reduced to smaller particles (~10 nm) and have a tendency to dispersion (Fig. 12a). In particular, the
dispersed nano-particles almost have the same crystallographic orientations as shown in Fig. 12b. It is
suggested that sub-micron CeB6 clusters continue to be reduced during the inoculation treatment. In
other words, CeB6 clusters might is instable or soluble in pure Al melt, although CeB6 has a high
melting point. To know the thermal stability of CeB6/Al inoculant, Fig. 13 shows the DSC examination
result of C3 alloy. It is clearly that no other thermic event is observed except two endothermic peaks.
The higher peak (934.2 K) is associated with the melting of α-Al matrix, and the lower one (912.7 K) is
associated with the melting temperature of eutectic (α-Al+ Al11Ce3) according to Fig. 1. It can be
confirmed that no chemically decomposition of CeB6 occurs at the inoculation temperature range. We
think that the reduced particles might relate to the pre-melting of low-melting-point eutectic phase
(α-Al+Al11Ce3) around the CeB6 clusters.
Fig. 14 shows a schematic image explaining the refinement of sub-micron CeB6 cluster.
According to Fig. 3b, we assume that big CeB6 clusters are composited of smaller clusters that are
connected by eutectic. During the addition of inoculant into Al melt, eutectic phase melts first leading
to the formation of thin liquid bands (Ce-rich liquid) among the CeB6 particles in the cluster (Fig. 14
t1-t2). These liquid bands can act as cracks in the cluster, leading to the subsequent crack of big cluster
with the role of heat stress. Next, Ce atoms in Ce-rich liquid must diffuse to the Al liquid without Ce
content (Fig. 14 t3). Affected by the crack and diffusion of Ce atoms, big clusters tend to divide into
smaller clusters, which not only increase the amount of potential nucleated surface but also narrowing
11

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
the distribution of cluster size to an ideal range. The melting of eutectic phase and diffusion of Ce
atoms also generate a diluted Al-Ce liquid layer around the cluster. It was known that solute atoms can
restrain the growth of the nucleated Al crystal [22]. Therefore, the growth of Al crystal will mainly
along the zigzag surface of the cluster while not toward the free liquid region as shown in Fig. 14 t5-t8.
In fact, it is a process of Al crystal swallowing the cluster, which causes nano particles to exist
intracrystaline whilst not on the grain boundary (see Fig. 12).
In previous work [20], we presented that {200}CeB6 can match {111}Al to stimulate the
nucleation of Al crystal. The zigzag surface of nano-CeB6 cluster promotes the probability of
{200}CeB6 matching {111}Al, such that the α-Al nucleus can be fast formed among the small particles.
In addition, it is important that nano particles in a cluster have almost the same crystallographic
orientation. This guarantees that aluminum crystals nucleated on the zigzag surface grows on a same
space orientation so that the grown crystal is a single one. If the orientation of the particles in one
cluster were very different, the cluster might stimulate multiple crystalline nuclei, resulting in the
cluster to stay between the nuclei. It also makes the cluster distribute on the grain boundary and
decreases the effect of dispersion strengthening.
5. Conclusions
1) In the present work, a preparation route of low-temperature synthesis and high-speed melt
spinning treatment of CeB6/Al inoculant is developed and the in situ inoculant shows highly
controllable microstructure. The size of CeB6 particles strongly dependes on the cooling rate
in preparation.
2) The grain refining effect of CeB6/Al inoculant is dependent on the size of CeB6 particle and
cluster. As the size of CeB6 clusters is reduced to ~300 nm, the inoculant shows enhanced
12

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
grain refining effect, and the average grain size of pure aluminum can be reduced to 110 ± 25
ꢀm.
3) The sub-micron CeB6 clusters are de-agglomerated to smaller ones composed of nano
particles with sizes of ~10 nm. The nano-CeB6 particles are highly in dispersion, resulting in
strong strengthening effect.
4) A cluster-swallowing model is proposed to explain the inoculation mechanism of CeB6
clusters. Nano-sized CeB6 particles are inclined to organize into sub-micron clusters in which
the crystallographic orientation of nano particles are matching. The naked zigzag step plays an
important role for the growth of the α-Al nuclei.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Nature Science Foundation of Tianjin (No. 14 JCYBJC17900),
Key projects of the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province (No. E2013209207 and No.
E2016202406) and Graduate Student Innovation Fund Project of Hebei province (No.220056).
13

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
References
[1] B.S. Murty, S.A. Kori, M. Chakraborty, Grain refinement of aluminum and its alloys by
heterogeneous nucleation and alloying, Int. Mater. Rev. 47 (2002) 3-29.
[2] M.A. Easton, D.H. StJohn, A model of grain refinement incorporating alloy constitution and
potency of heterogeneous nucleant particles, Acta Mater. 49 (2001) 1867-1878.
[3] M.A. Easton, M. Qian, A. Prasad, D.H. StJohn, Recent advances in grain refinement of light metals
and alloys, Curr. Opin. Solid. St. M. 20 (2016) 13-24.
[4] P.S. Mohanty, J.E. Gruzleski, Mechanism of grain refinement in aluminum, Acta Metall. Mater. 43
(1995) 2001-2012.
[5] X.B. Qi, Y. Chen, X.H. Kang, D. Z. Li, Q. Du, An analytical approach for predicting as-cast grain
size of inoculated aluminum alloys, Acta Mater. 99 (2015) 337-346.
[6] A. Cibula, The mechanism of grain refinement of sand castings in aluminum alloys, J. Inst. Met. 76
(1949-50) 321-360.
[7] A. Cibula, The grain refinement of aluminum alloy castings by additions of titanium and boron, J.
Inst. Met. 80 (1951-52) 1-16.
[8] J.F. Nie, X.G. Ma, H.M. Ding, X.F. Liu, Microstructure and grain refining performance of a new
14

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Al-Ti-C-B master alloy, J. Alloys Compd. 486 (2009) 185-190.
[9] B. Yucel, Grain refining efficiency of Al-Ti-C alloys, J. Alloys Compd. 422 (2006) 128-131.
[10] T. E. Quested, Understanding mechanisms of grain refinement of aluminum alloys by inoculation,
Mater. Sci. Technol. 20 (2004) 1357-1369.
[11] Z.J. Wang, N.C. Si, Synthesis and refinement performance of the novel Al-Ti-B-RE master alloy
grain refiner, Rare Metal Mater. Eng. 44:12 (2015) 2970-2975.
[12] S.A. Zhou, Z. Zhang, M. Li, D.J. Pan, H.L. Su, X.D. Du, P. Li, Y.C. Wu, Effect of Sc on
microstructure and mechanical properties of as-cast Al-Mg alloys, Mater. Des. 90 (2016) 1077-1084.
[13] Z.Y. Guo, G.Zhao, X.G. Chen, Effects of two-step homogenization on precipitation behavior of
Al3Zr dispersoids and recrystallization resistance in 7150 aluminum alloy, Mater. Charact. 102 (2015)
122-130.
[14] A. Sadeghi, M. Hoseini, M. Pekguleryuz, Effect of Sr addition on texture evolution of
Mg-3Al-1Zn (AZ31) alloy during extrusion, Mat. Sci. Eng. A 528 (2011) 3096-3104.
[15] W.X. Huang, H. Yan, Effect of Addition of Y with Ultrasonic Field Assistance on as-Cast
Microstructure of AZ91 Alloy, Rare Metal Mat. Eng. 42 (2013) 2346-2350.
[16] R. Pérez-Bustamante, A. Reyna-Cruz, D. C. Acosta-Peña, Effect of cerium/lanthanum addition on
microstructure and mechanical properties of Al7075 alloy via mechanical alloying and sintering, J.
Rare. Earth, 34:4 (2016) 420.
[17] M. Nowak, L. Bolzoni, N. Hari Babu, The effect of Nb-B inoculation on binary hypereutectic and
near-eutectic LM13 Al–Si cast alloys, J. Alloys Compd. 641 (2015) 22-29.
[18] M. Nowak, W.K. Yeoh, L. Bolzoni, N. Hari Babu, Development of Al-Nb-B master alloys using
Nb and KBF4 Powders, Mater. Des. 75 (2015) 40-46.
15

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
[19] P.T. Li, W. Tian, D. Wang, X. Liu, Grain refining potency of LaB6 on aluminum alloy, J. Rare.
Earth, 30 (2012) 1172-1176.
[20] S.Q. Liu, X. Wang, C.X. Cui, L.C. Zhao, S.J. Liu, C. Chen, Fabrication, microstructure and
refining mechanism of in situ CeB6/Al inoculant in aluminum, Mater. Des. 65 (2015) 432-437.
[21] A.L. Greer, A. M. Bunn, A. Tronche, P.V. Evans, D.J. Bristow, Modelling of inoculation of
metallic melts: application to grain refinement of aluminum by Al-Ti-B, Acta Mater. 48 (2000)
2823-2835.
[22] T.E. Quested, A.L. Greer, The effect of the size distribution of inoculant particles on as-cast grain
size in aluminum alloys, Acta Mater. 52 (2004) 3859-3868.
[23] C.X. Cui, Y.C. Li, Y.T. Shen, Interaction mechanism of in situ nano-TiN- AlN particles and solid/
liquid interface during solidification, J. Nanosci. Nanotechno. 3 (2003) 1-3.
[24] Q.L. Li, T.D. Xia, Y.F. Lan, W.J. Zhao, L Fan, P.F. Li, Effect of rare earth cerium addition on the
microstructure and tensile properties of hypereutectic Al-20%Si alloy, J. Alloys Compd. 562 (2013)
25-32.
[25] M.A. Easton, D.H. StJohn, Improved prediction of the grain size of aluminum alloys that includes
the effect of cooling rate, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 486 (2008) 8-13.
[26] A. Verma, S. Kumar, P.S. Grant, K.A.Q. O’Reilly, Influence of cooling rate on the Fe
intermetallic formation in an AA6063 Al alloy, J. Alloys Compd. 555 (2013) 274-282.
[27] M. Rajabi, A. Simchia, P. Davamia, Microstructure and mechanical properties of Al-20Si-5Fe-2X
(X=Cu, Ni, Cr) alloys produced by melt-spinning, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 492 (2008) 443-449.
[28] Z.W. Chen, Y.M. Lei, H.F. Zhang, Structure and properties of nanostructured A357 alloy
produced by melt spinning compared with direct chill ingot, J. Alloys Compd. 509 (2011) 7473-7477.
16

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
[29] T.S. Dong, C.X. Cui, S.J. Liu, L.J. Yang, J.B. Sun, Influence of rapid solidification of Cu-P
intermediate alloy on wear resistance of Al-Si alloy, Rare Metal Mater. Eng. 37(4) (2008) 0686-0689.
[30] X.B. Liu, Y. Osawa, S. Takamori, T. Mukai, Grain refinement of AZ91 alloy by introducing
ultrasonic vibration during solidification, Mater. Lett. 62 (2008) 2872-2875.
[31] J. Qin, G. Chen, X.H. Ji, X.G. Song, N. Hu, F. Han, Z.M. Du, Effect of reaction temperature on
the microstructures and mechanical properties of high-intensity ultrasonic assisted in-situ Al3Ti/2024
Al composites, J. Alloys Compd. 666 (2016) 58-64.
[32] X.X. Dong, L.J. He, G.B. Mi, P.J. Li, Two directional microstructure and effects of nanoscale
dispersed Si particles on microhardness and tensile properties of AlSi7Mg melt-spun alloy, J. Alloys
Compd. 618 (2015) 609-614.
[33] O. Uzun, T. Karaaslan, M. Gogebakan, M. Keskin, Hardness and microstructural characteristics of
rapidly solidified Al-8-16 wt.% Si alloy, J. Alloys Compd. 376 (2002) 149-157.
[34] S. Takayama, Amorphous structures and their formation and stability, J. Mater. Sci. 11 (1976)
164-185.
[35] Y.E. Kalay, L.S. Chumbley, I.E. Anderson, R.E. Napolitano, Characterization of Hypereutectic
Al-Si Powders Solidified under Far-From Equilibrium Conditions, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 38 (2007)
1452-1457.
[36] R.S. Harini, J. Nampoothiri, B. Nagasivamuni, B. Raj, K.R. Ravi, Ultrasonic assisted grain
refinement of Al–Mg alloy using in-situ MgAl2O4 particles, Mater. Lett. 145 (2015) 328-331.
[37] C.L. Xu, H.Y. Wang, F. Qiu, Y.F. Yang, Q.C. Jiang, Cooling rate and microstructure of rapidly
solidified Al-20 wt.% Si alloy, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 417 (2006) 275-280.
[38] X.X. Dong, L.J. He, P.J. Li, Gradient microstructure and multiple mechanical properties of
17

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
AlSi9Cu alloy ribbon produced by melt spinning, J. Alloys Compd. 612 (2014) 20-25.
[39] Y.N. Dai, Binary alloy phase’s diagrams, Science Press, China, 2009.
[40] C.P. Liu, F.S. Pan, W.Q. Wang, Phase analysis of Al-Mn compounds in the AZ magnesium alloys,
Mater. Sci. Forum, 546-549 (2007) 395-398.
[41] ASTM E112-13. Standard test methods for determining average grain size. ASTM International,
West Conshohocken (USA), 2013.
[42] ASTM B557M-15.Standard test methods for tension testing wrought and cast aluminum and
magnesium alloy products. ASTM International, West Conshohocken (USA), 2016.
[43] L. Liu, Y.M. Yiu, T.K. Sham, Electronic structures of LaB6 and CeB6 single crystals: X-ray
absorption near-edge structure studies at the B K-edge and the La and Ce giant resonance, J. Electron.
Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 184 (2011) 188-191.
[44] R.K. Selvan, I. Genish, I. Perelshtein, J.M. Calderon Moreno, A. Gedanken, Single Step,
Low-Temperature Synthesis of Submicron-Sized Rare Earth Hexaborides, J. Phys. Chem. C 112 (2008)
1795-1802.
[45] K. Wang, C.X. Cui, Q. Wang, S.J. Liu, C.S. Gu, The microstructure and formation mechanism of
core-shell-likeTiAl3/Ti2Al20Ce in melt-spun Al-Ti-B-Re grain refiner, Mater. Lett. 85 (2012) 153-156.
[46] T.S. Srivatsan, M. Al-Hajri, C. Smith, M. Petraroli, The tensile response and fracture behavior of
2009 Al alloy metal matrix composite, Mater. Sci. Eng. A 346 (2003) 91-100.
[47] J.P. Buban, K. Matsunaga, J Chen, Grain boundary strengthening in aluminum by Rare earth,
Science 311 (2006) 212-215.
[48] W.S. Miller, F.J. Humphreys, Strengthening mechanism in particulate metal matrix composites,
Script. Mater. 25 (1991) 33-38.
18

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
[49] R.J. Arsenault, L Wang, C.R. Feng, Strengthening of composites due to microstructural changes in
the matrix, Acta Metall. 39 (1991) 47-57.
Figures caption
Fig. 1. Binary alloy phase diagrams of (a) Al-B system and (b) Al-Ce system [39].
Fig. 2. XRD spectrum of the C0 inoculant alloy.
Fig. 3. SEM images and EDS patterns of alloy C0. (a) Typical SEM image, (b) Al-Ce eutectic in local
region of alloy C0, (c)-(d) EDS spectrum of point A and B in (b) and (e)-(f) SEM image showing the
morphology of the particles extracted from C0 alloy.
Fig. 4. (a) Temperature-time plots of different CeB6/Al ribbons during solidification and (b)-(d) Optical
micrographs of the ribbons with different cooling rates showing the corresponding thickness.
Fig. 5. XRD spectra of the inoculant alloys with different cooling rates. (a) C1 alloy, (b) C2 alloy and
(c) C3 alloy.
Fig. 6. SEM image of (a) C1 alloy, (b) C2 alloy, (c) C3 alloy and (d) EDS spectrum of (c).
Fig. 7. Distribution diagram of the size of the CeB6 particles in (a) C1 alloy, (b) C2 alloy and (c) C3
alloy.
Fig. 8. SEM images of the particles extracted from (a) C1 alloy, (b) C2 alloy and (c) C3 alloy,
respectively.
19

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Fig. 9. Optical images of as-cast aluminum samples: (a),(e) pure Al without inoculation, (b),(f) (c),(g)
and (d),(h) are inoculation with C1, C2 andC3 alloy, respectively.
Fig. 10. Mechanical properties of different as-cast aluminum samples after inoculation.
Fig. 11. (a) Typical TEM image of C3 alloy, (b) Electron diffraction pattern of the cluster in (a) and (c)
Inverting image of (b) showing the marked diffraction information.
Fig. 12. TEM characterization of the as-cast aluminum inculanted by CeB6/Al ribbon C3. (a) TEM
micrograph showing nano-sized CeB6 particles cluster and (b) HRTEM image of the particle marked in
Fig. 12(a).
Fig. 13. DSC curve showing the melting behavior of C3 alloy.
Fig. 14. Schematic image showing the nucleation and growth process of an aluminum grain upon a
sub-micron cluster composed of nano-sized CeB6 particles.
20

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Figures
Figure 1
21

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Figure 2
22

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Figure 3
23

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Figure 4
24

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Figure 5
25

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Figure 6
26

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Figure 7
27

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Figure 8
28

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Figure 9
29