092110-3
Aravind et al.
Appl. Phys. Lett. 95, 092110 ͑2009͒
sides of the original peak at low bias voltages in Fig. 2. A
similar analysis is performed ͑not shown͒ as a function of
temperature at a fixed low bias voltage and the result clearly
indicates the onset of satellite peaks on both sides of the
main peak at lower temperatures. The two prominent periods
in the Coulomb oscillations inspire us to model the device
using two coupled dissimilar Coulomb islands, and we nu-
merically simulate this intuitive model using the standard
Master equation approach in the sequential tunneling limit5
and find qualitative agreement with the experimental results.
The device parameters chosen for the simulation are C1
=100 aF, R1=26 k⍀, C2=130 aF, R2=26 k⍀, Cc=4 aF,
and Rc=50 k⍀. The gate capacitances are Cg1=230.3 aF
and 77.7 aF for the big and the small island, respectively.
Figure 4͑b͒ is the simulated I-Vg Coulomb oscillation sub-
jected to a constant bias Vb=0.15 mV at several tempera-
tures and Fig. 4͑c͒ is the I-Vg oscillation at a fixed tempera-
ture T=1 K under two different bias conditions. We can
clearly see that the fine structures on either side of the main
peak emerge at low bias and low temperatures. Higher bias
voltages open a window which surmounts the charging level
spacing corresponding to the e/Cgl of the big dot; the small
dot ͑Is͒ alone prevails leading to a single period oscillation
corresponding to e/Cgs. At low enough voltages, both the
dots become appreciable and the Coulomb oscillation has
complicated gate dependence depending on the ratio of Cgl
and Cgs. The newly added short periods are thus attributed to
additional Coulomb islands forming inadvertently in the vi-
cinity of the initial island. This crossover from periodic os-
cillation at high temperatures to aperiodic oscillations at
lower temperatures is not a measurement artifact or noise
and has survived three complete thermal cycles ͑three differ-
ent runs͒ from He3/He4 fridge to room temperature. If the
aperiodic oscillation at low temperatures were to come from
noise effects, it would not be reproducible in repeated mea-
surements and the FFT of the measured signal would be a
random conglomeration of oscillation periods. It is also
straight forward to extend our model to multiple islands
which become important at much lower temperatures. We
have measured the I-Vg oscillations at 75 mK ͑not shown͒
and the interesting cross over from single period high bias
oscillation to multiple period low bias traces is still retained.
The physics of InN is very unique compared to other
III-V materials and has attracted a lot of recent attention. Ab
initio calculations of band structures predict that the branch
point energy of InN lies within the conduction band at the
⌫-point and is thus responsible for the surface states.6 The
high-resolution electron-energy-loss spectroscopy measure-
ments on clean InN surfaces provides an unambiguous proof
of metallic or donor type surface accumulation states up to a
thickness of about 5 nm.7 The origin of surface states is
twofold. First, it is an accepted inherent electronic band
structure property of clean InN nanowires and second, the
ambient oxygen forms native indium oxide, which is be-
lieved to cause large surface accumulation layer.8 These two
phenomena together can account for the robust surface accu-
mulation states and it is thus justified to consider that in our
device the electrons hop along the nanowire surface states.
Moreover, these states by nature fall in disordered metallic
regime. Similar crossover from periodic to quasi periodic
I-Vg oscillations in disordered systems has already been re-
ported and is well understood in GaAs wires.9 Further,
charge transport at very low temperatures in disordered sys-
tem was also modeled as arising from mixed Coulomb oscil-
the disordered potential10 and the crossover from periodic to
quasiperiodic oscillations was attributed to incommensurate
energy scales required to add charges to the two dots.
Further, the I-Vg Coulomb oscillations are taken under
external magnetic fields up to 5 T. The striking observation is
that satellite peak structure along with the main peak sur-
vives even in high magnetic fields. There is neither shift in
the peak position nor observable change in the peak height. It
is widely believed that electron transport through Coulomb
charging system with continuous density of states is insensi-
tive to the magnetic field, and our model of weakly coupled
Coulomb islands are thus justified.
In summary we present a single electron transistor based
on an individual indium nitride nanowire. The interesting
crossover from high voltage, high temperature single period
Coulomb oscillation to low bias, low temperature multiple
period oscillations implies the interesting interplay of Cou-
lomb charging effects from more than one Coulomb island.
The tunnel barriers between the islands arise inadvert-
ently due to large fluctuations in the underlying disordered
potential. We propose and simulate an intuitive model ex-
plaining the observed phenomena. The present work sheds
light on the unexplored single electron charging behavior and
transport of InN nanowires and is an encouraging develop-
ment toward the InN based electronics and optoelectronics
devices.
This research was funded by the National Science Coun-
cil of Taiwan under Grant No. NSC 95-2112-M-001-062-
MY3. Technical support from NanoCore, the Core Facilities
for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology at Academia Sinica, is
acknowledged. The first two authors, K.A and Y.W.S., con-
tributed equally to this work.
1Y. Li, F. Qian, J. Xiang, and C. M. Lieber, Mater. Today 9, 18 ͑2006͒.
2J. Xiang, W. Lu, Y. Hu, Y. Wu, H. Yan, and C. M. Lieber, Nature ͑London͒
441, 489 ͑2006͒.
3J. Wu, W. Walukiewicz, K. M. Yu, J. W. Ager III, E. E. Haller, H. Lu, W.
4M. S. Hu, W. M. Wang, T. T. Chen, L. S. Hong, C. W. Chen, C. C. Chen,
͑2006͒.
5H. Grabert and M. H. Devoret, Single Charge Tunneling ͑Plenum, New
York, 1992͒, Vol. 294.
6I. Mahboob, T. D. Veal, L. F. J. Piper, C. F. McConville, H. Lu, W. J.
Schaff, J. Furthmüller, and F. Bechstedt, Phys. Rev. B 69, 201307 ͑2004͒.
7I. Mahboob, T. D. Veal, C. F. McConville, H. Lu, and W. J. Schaff, Phys.
8F. Werner, F. Limbach, M. Carsten, C. Denker, J. Malindretos, and A.
129.97.125.181 On: Tue, 09 Dec 2014 14:52:10