Communication
ChemComm
into cis-Azo-FF. Because the a-cyclodextrin cavity was unfavorable
2 (a) Q. Jiang, H.-Y. Zhang, M. Han, Z.-J. Ding and Y. Liu, Org. Lett.,
2010, 12, 1728–1731; (b) L. Fang, M. Hmadeh, J. Wu, M. A. Olson,
J. M. Spruell, A. Trabolsi, Y.-W. Yang, M. Elhabiri, A.-M. Albrecht-
Gary and J. F. Stoddart, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 7126–7134;
(c) Y. Cao, X.-Y. Hu, Y. Li, X. Zou, S. Xiong, C. Lin, Y.-Z. Shen and
L. Wang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2014, 136, 10762–10769; (d) Y. Bae,
S. Fukushima, A. Harada and K. Kataoka, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
20
to include cis-Azo-FF, the trans-Azo-FF/a-cyclodextrin nanohelix
was disrupted. As a result, the dissociated cis-Azo-FF self-
assembled into a nanosquare like in the case of free cis-Azo-FF
(Fig. S11, ESI†).
In addition to the light irradiation, the change in polarity
could also adjust the morphology of assembly owing to the non-
covalent nature of the supramolecular interactions working
between a-cyclodextrin and trans-Azo-FF. For example, the
addition of ethanol to the aqueous solution of trans-Azo-FF/
a-cyclodextrin would lead to the conversion of a nanohelix into
a nanofiber (Fig. S13a and b, ESI†). A possible reason for this
may be that the addition of ethanol weakened the hydrophobic
interactions between a-cyclodextrin and trans-Azo-FF, which
consequently resulted in the dissociation of the trans-Azo-FF/
a-cyclodextrin complex. Then, the dissociated trans-Azo-FF self-
assembled into a nanofiber (Fig. S13b, ESI†), like in the case of
free trans-Azo-FF. However, when further adding water to the
2
003, 42, 4640–4643.
3 (a) T. Shiraki, A. Dawn, Y. Tsuchiya and S. Shinkai, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
010, 132, 13928–13935; (b) M. Ikeda, R. Ochi, Y. s. Kurita,
2
D. J. Pochan and I. Hamachi, Chem. – Eur. J., 2012, 18, 13091–13096.
C. Liu, Q. Jin, K. Lv, L. Zhang and M. Liu, Chem. Commun., 2014, 50,
3702–3705.
4
5
(a) H. Ma, J. Fei, Q. Li and J. Li, Small, 2015, 11, 1787–1791;
(
b) H. Yamaguchi, Y. Kobayashi, R. Kobayashi, Y. Takashima,
A. Hashidzume and A. Harada, Nat. Commun., 2012, 3, 603; (c) F. Xie,
L. Qin and M. Liu, Chem. Commun., 2016, 52, 930–933.
6
(a) Z. Yang, G. Liang, L. Wang and B. Xu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006,
128, 3038–3043; (b) D.-S. Guo, K. Wang, Y.-X. Wang and Y. Liu, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 10244–10250.
7 (a) M. Nakahata, Y. Takashima, H. Yamaguchi and A. Harada, Nat.
Commun., 2011, 2, 511; (b) Y. Zhang, B. Zhang, Y. Kuang, Y. Gao,
J. Shi, X. X. Zhang and B. Xu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 5008–5011.
8
(a) J. del Barrio, R. M. Tejedor, L. S. Chinelatto, C. S ´a nchez, M. Pi n˜ ol
and L. Oriol, Chem. Mater., 2009, 22, 1714–1723; (b) P. Wan, Y. Jiang,
Y. Wang, Z. Wang and X. Zhang, Chem. Commun., 2008, 5710–5712;
above described H O/EtOH solution, the nanofiber reversibly
2
converted into a nanohelix (Fig. S13b and c, ESI†).
(
3
c) A. S. Matharu, S. Jeeva and P. Ramanujam, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2007,
6, 1868–1880; (d) H. L. Sun, Y. Chen, J. Zhao and Y. Liu, Angew.
In conclusion, taking advantage of the photoisomerization
properties of azobenzene derivatives, the distinct binding affinity
of a-cyclodextrin with trans- and cis-conformers of azobenzene,
as well as the non-covalent nature of supramolecular inter-
actions, a photo/chemo dual-controlled supramolecular assembly
was successfully constructed. Crucially, the morphology of the
assembly could be switched between the nanohelix and nano-
Chem., 2015, 127, 9508–9512; (e) J. del Barrio, P. N. Horton,
D. Lairez, G. O. Lloyd, C. Toprakcioglu and O. A. Scherman, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, 11760–11763.
(a) I. Tomatsu, A. Hashidzume and A. Harada, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2006, 128, 2226–2227; (b) Y. Wang, N. Ma, Z. Wang and X. Zhang,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 2823–2826.
9
1
0 C. Park, I. H. Lee, S. Lee, Y. Song, M. Rhue and C. Kim, Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2006, 103, 1199–1203.
square under light irradiation, and could be switched between the 11 Z. Yu, F. Tantakitti, T. Yu, L. C. Palmer, G. C. Schatz and S. I. Stupp,
Science, 2016, 351, 497–502.
2 Y. Cai, Z. Guo, J. Chen, W. Li, L. Zhong, Y. Gao, L. Jiang, L. Chi,
H. Tian and W.-H. Zhu, J. Am. Chem. Soc, 2016, 138, 2219–2224.
nanohelix and nanofiber by changing the polarity of the solvent;
both of these morphological conversions were reversible and
1
repeatable, accompanied by a controlled chiral amplification 13 M. Reches and E. Gazit, Science, 2003, 300, 625–627.
1
4 (a) Q. Li, Y. Jia, L. Dai, Y. Yang and J. Li, ACS Nano, 2015, 9,
or attenuation. The photoswitchable and/or chemoswitchable
morphological conversion and chiral modulation properties,
along with the facile preparation and good water solubility, may
make this supramolecular assembly approach well-suited for
the design and smart control of new functional materials.
2689–2695; (b) X. Yan, Y. Cui, Q. He, K. Wang and J. Li, Chem.
Mater., 2008, 20, 1522–1526; (c) Y. Wang, W. Qi, R. Huang, X. Yang,
M. Wang, R. Su and Z. He, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2015, 137, 7869–7880;
(
d) C. Song, M. G. Blaber, G. Zhao, P. Zhang, H. C. Fry, G. C. Schatz
and N. L. Rosi, Nano Lett., 2013, 13, 3256–3261; (e) X. Yan, P. Zhu
and J. Li, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2010, 39, 1877–1890.
We thank NNSFC (21432004, 21672113 and 91527301) for 15 (a) L. Adler-Abramovich, N. Kol, I. Yanai, D. Barlam, R. Z. Shneck,
E. Gazit and I. Rousso, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2010, 49, 9939–9942;
financial support.
(
b) M. Reches and E. Gazit, Phys. Biol., 2006, 3, S10; (c) M. Reches
and E. Gazit, Isr. J. Chem., 2005, 45, 363–371.
Notes and references
1
16 Y. Wang, R. Huang, W. Qi, Z. Wu, R. Su and Z. He, Nanotechnology,
2
013, 24, 465603.
(a) I. L. Medintz, M. H. Stewart, S. A. Trammell, K. Susumu, J. B. 17 X. Liao, G. Chen, X. Liu, W. Chen, F. Chen and M. Jiang, Angew.
Delehanty, B. C. Mei, J. S. Melinger, J. B. Blanco-Canosa, P. E. Dawson Chem., Int. Ed., 2010, 49, 4409–4413.
and H. Mattoussi, Nat. Mater., 2010, 9, 676–684; (b) T. F. A. De Greef, 18 I. Tomatsu, A. Hashidzume and A. Harada, Macromolecules, 2005,
M. M. J. Smulders, M. Wolffs, A. P. H. J. Schenning, R. P. Sijbesma and 38, 5223–5227.
E. W. Meijer, Chem. Rev., 2009, 109, 5687–5754; (c) M. Galli, J. E. Lewis 19 A. A. Beharry, O. Sadovski and G. A. Woolley, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011,
and S. M. Goldup, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2015, 54, 13545–13549; 133, 19684–19687.
d) M. Elsabahy and K. L. Wooley, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2012, 41, 2545–2561. 20 W. Wang and M.-Z. Wang, Polym. Bull., 2007, 59, 537–544.
(
Chem. Commun.
This journal is ©The Royal Society of Chemistry 2016