Y. Joyard et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 23 (2013) 3704–3708
3705
with trifluoroacetic acid to lead to the expected derivative 1b.
O
N
The so-obtained amine was reacted with commercially available
NO2
N
N
H
O
Fmoc-L
-Cys(Trt)-OH using propylphosphonic anhydride T3PÒ to af-
O
H
N
N
O
N
ford the desired protected nitroimidazole derivative 2a. The subse-
quent Fmoc-deprotection was achieved by classical reaction with
piperidine, leading to amine 2b. On the other hand, a peptidic cou-
pling reaction with available glycine methyl ester hydrochloride
N
Tc
HO
N
O
B
O
O
Tc
N
O
N
Cl
O
and Boc-L-Lys(Boc)-OH, DCHA gave the protected dipeptide 3a.
The ester group of 3a was also converted into an acid moiety to
give 3b. Then, the required protected tripeptide 4a was prepared
from ester 3a following a classical hydrolysis with LiOH and cou-
pling with 2b in the presence of the cationic coupling agent HBTU.
Moreover, it should be noted that the protected tripeptide 4a was
also synthesized starting from 3b and T3PÒ. Finally, the cleavage of
both NH-Boc and S-Trityl protecting groups was conducted by
means of TFA in the presence of triethylsilane and phenol as scav-
engers to give the desired tripeptide 4b. Optimization of the radio-
labeling procedure of 4b was then conducted (Scheme 2, Table 1).
N
N
O2N
nitroimidazole-BATO
Schiff Base nitroimidazole
O
Tc
N
O
N
N
N
N
N
O
NO2
H
BMS181321
So, peptide 4b (10
(20 mg in 0.5 mL, pH 7), 99mTcOÀ4 (740 MBq) and tin(II) chloride
(40 g in 0.1 mL). The resulting solution was analyzed by radio-
lg) was radiolabeled with sodium tartrate
Figure 1. Structures of selected technetium-containing nitroimidazoles tested for
imaging.
l
HPLC. The reaction was first studied at 25 °C and a 95% radiochem-
ical yield was obtained when the reaction time was changed from
10 to 60 min (Table 1, entries 2 and 3). We then decided to perform
the reaction at 100 °C (Table 1, entry 4). These conditions have
enabled us to considerably reduce the reaction time to 10 min
(Table 1, entry 4). Using this labeling procedure, the complex
was obtained with a radiochemical purity of 95% as a syn and
anti-diastereoisomers mixture 5a,b (Fig. 2). It has been demon-
strated that the presence of two radiometric peaks is due to the
resolution of diasteroisomers resulting from the chiral centers on
the peptide backbone and the chiral technetium.12b,16 It is difficult
to determine directly the formation of the 99mTc-complex because
of the extremely small amount of the compound present. However,
the formation of 99mTc-complex 5a,b could be indirectly deter-
mined by comparison with 6a,b which can be easily prepared. Re
and Tc belongs to the same group of the periodic table and are sim-
ilar in size. In our case, the analogue rhenium complex 6a,b was
There are many examples in the literature12 reporting the use of
peptides acting as chelating agent of 99mTc (NxS4-x). But to date
there are only few examples of hypoxia radiotracers using such li-
gands to complex 99mTc. Indeed, only Ballinger and co-workers.13
report the use of sequences glycine–serine–cysteine and glycine–
cysteine–glycine to chelate 99mTc.
In this study, a cysteine–glycine–lysine sequence with a bio-
reducible moiety, 2-nitroimidazole, was synthesized and labeled
with 99mTc. We chose to use a 2-nitroimidazole moiety as a vector
since it has a better response to hypoxia than 4- and 5-nitroimi-
dazoles isomers.14 The latter was then evaluated as a tumor hypox-
ia marker.
The chelating agent 4b was synthesized through a multi-step
reaction using 2-nitroimidazole as a starting material. The synthe-
sis procedure is outlined in Scheme 1. On the one hand, according
to a procedure reported in the literature by Hay et al.,15 2-nitroim-
idazole was reacted with tert-butyl 2-bromoethylcarbamate to
give compound 1a. Then, the Boc protecting group was cleaved
O
R
O
N
N
O
O
M
NH2
5a,b
6a,b
N
N
S
N
H
NO2
N
Trt
S
NO2
4b
NO2
N
N
N
H
N
5a
a for
b for 5b
H2N
a
STrt
OH
NO2
HN
RHN
N
: syn and anti, M = 99mTc
: syn and anti, M = Re
FmocHN
O
1a
: R = NHBoc
1b : R = NH2.TFA
O
b
2a
: R = Fmoc
d
c
2b : R = H
Scheme 2. Reagents and conditions. (a) SnCl2, 99mTcO4À, sodium tartrate pH 7.0,
100 °C, 10 min (radiochemical yield 95%); (b) ReOCl3(PPh3)2, NaOAc, MeOH, 70 °C,
NHBoc
NHBoc
4 h.
H3CO
+
O
O
e
H
N
OH.DCHA
BocHN
BocHN
NH2.HCl
OR
O
O
Table 1
3a : R = CH3
Labeling conditions of 99mTc-complex 5a,b with sodium pertechnetate and tin(II)
f
NHR1
3b
: R = OH
chloride
g
h
SR2
Entry 4b
g)
Sodium tartrate Final
Temperature
(°C)
Time
(min)
RCY
(%)
O
NO2
N
(
l
(mg)
pH
: R1 = Boc, R2 = Trt
4b : R1 = R2 = H
H
H
4a
N
N
i
R1HN
N
H
N
1
2
3
4
5
6
100
10
10
10
10
10
—
5
25
25
25
100
100
100
10
10
60
10
10
10
76
89
95
95
38
38
O
O
20
20
20
20
20
5
5
Scheme 1. Reagents and conditions: (a) tert-Butyl 2-bromoethylcarbamate, K2CO3,
DMF, 110 °C, 5 h (57%); (b) TFA, 25 °C, 10 min (99%); (c) T3PÒ, DIEA, CH2Cl2, 25 °C,
12 h (86%); (d) piperidine (20% mol), DMF, 25 °C, 16 h (53%); (e) T3PÒ, DIEA, CH2Cl2,
25 °C, 12 h (86%); (f) LiOH, H2O, 25 °C, 12 h (85%); (g) LiOH, H2O, DMF, CH2Cl2 then
2b, HBTU, DIEA, DMF, 25 °C, 12 h (43%); (h) 2b, T3PÒ, DIEA, CH2Cl2, 25 °C, 12 h
(53%); (i) TFA, H2O, TES, phenol, 0 °C, 1 h (52%).
5
9a
4b
a
Phosphate buffer 0.2 M pH 9, 0.5 mL.
Citric acid buffer, 20 mM pH 4, 0.5 mL.
b