2
L. Duan et al. / Journal of Alloys and Compounds 831 (2020) 154697
generate plenty of new materials or new phases, which can hardly
be synthesized under ambient pressure. Motivated in part by the
lack of information on titanium pnictides, we set out to conduct an
exploratory work in the LaeTi-X (X ¼ P, As) systems using high
pressure technique. Here, we report on the synthesis, crystal and
electronic structure, and physical properties of the new ternary
compounds of La3TiAs5 and La3TiP5, as well as the solid solutions of
La3Ti(Sb1-xAsx)5 (x ¼ 0e1) and La3Ti(As1-yPy)5 (y ¼ 0e1).
to obtain La3TiAs(P)5 at ambient pressure is complex and not just
the high vapor pressure of P and As.
Fig. 2(a) presents the sketch of crystal structure of La3TiX5
viewed with the projection along the [001] direction. The structure
consists of face-sharing TiX6 octahedral chains along the c axis,
which are arranged in a triangular lattice form. The X1 anions,
occupying the site of (x, 0, 1/4), surround the center ions of Ti to
form TiX6 octahedrons. Besides the TiX6 chains, the anions X2
located at the center of the triangular lattice with the site of (1/3, 2/
3, 0) are space-equally aligned along the c axis to form the X-chains.
The corresponding intrachain distance of X2-X2, is 2.8819 Å for
La3TiP5 and 2.9537 Å for La3TiAs5, which is a little larger than the
typical bond length of PeP (2.2e2.3 Å) [22] and AseAs (~2.5 Å) [23],
respectively. The moderate intrachain distance of X2-X2 suggests
the X2 anions in the linear X-chains are hypervalent with a formal
charge of X22ꢂ. The similar hypervalent Bi2ꢂ has been reported in
La3TiBi5 compound [4]. As for the interchain distances of X2-X2 and
X1-X2 shown in Table 2, they are so large enough that there is no
directly orbital overlap between each two chains of the X-chains
and TiX6 octahedral chains. Fig. 2(b) shows the partial structure for
La3TiX5, displaying the connection of TiX6 chains by face-sharing
LaX9 polyhedrons. There are nine X-ligands surrounding the cen-
ter La3þ ion, of which four X1 ligands come from the same TiX6
chain, one X1 ligands from the other TiX6 chain and the other four
X2 ligands come from the X-chains. The distances of LaeP in the
LaP9 polyhedron in La3TiP5 range from 2.9194 Å to 3.1228 Å, and the
bond lengths between the nine As-ligands and the center La3þ ions
in La3TiAs5 range from 3.0088 Å to 3.1878 Å. In addition, it is noted
that the corresponding distance of LaeLa in La3TiAs5 and La3TiP5 is
3.6726 Å and 3.5864 Å, respectively, which are comparable with the
interatomic distance in La metal (~3.65 Å) [24].
To further study the evolution of crystallographic data including
lattice, some important distances and angles from La3TiSb5 to
La3TiP5, we successfully synthesized the solid solutions of La3T-
i(Sb1-xAsx)5 (x ¼ 0e1) and La3Ti(As1-yPy)5 (y ¼ 0e1) under high
pressure and high temperature conditions. Fig. 3 (a-b, d-e) displays
the x-ray diffraction patterns of the solid solutions. When
increasing the doping level of x and y, the peaks shift monotonously
towards a high-angle direction, which demonstrates that the As
and P atoms are doped into La3TiSb5 and La3TiAs5, respectively. We
also carried out the refinements for the X-ray diffraction data of the
solid solutions of La3Ti(Sb1-xAsx)5 (x ¼ 0e1) and La3Ti(As1-yPy)5
(y ¼ 0e1) (see Figs. S1eS9 and Tables S1eS9). The lattice param-
eters a and c can be obtained from the refinements. The doping
dependence of lattice parameters is plotted as shown in Fig. 3(c, f).
The obtained lattice constants a ¼ 9.5265 (7) Å and c ¼ 6.2770 (5) Å
of La3TiSb5 agree with those reported in previous work [10]. These
lattice constants decrease linearly as the doping level x and y in-
crease. From La3TiSb5 to La3TiAs5 and to La3TiP5, the unit cell vol-
ume is shrunk by 15.6% and 21.9%, respectively.
2. Experimental
Commercially available lumps of La (Alfa, >99.999% pure), lumps
of As (Alfa, >99.999% pure), Sb powder (Alfa, >99.99% pure), P
powder (Alfa, >99% pure) and Ti powder (Alfa, >99.99% pure) were
used as the starting materials. The precursor LaX (X ¼ Sb, As and P)
were prepared by the reaction of La lumps and X powders at 700 ꢀC
in an evacuated quartz tube. We tried to synthesize La3TiX5 (X ¼ P,
As) at ambient pressure with the detail similar to that for La3TiSb5
[10]. However, we cannot obtain the samples of La3TiX5 (X ¼ P, As)
via ambient synthesis. Here, the La3Ti(Sb1-xAsx)5 (x ¼ 0e1) and
La3Ti(As1-yPy)5 (y ¼ 0e1) samples were synthesized successfully
under high pressure and high temperature conditions. The LaX, Ti
and X powders were mixed according to the elementary ratio of
stoichiometric La3TiX5, pressed into a pellet with a diameter of
6 mm, and then subjected to high-pressure synthesis under 5.5 GPa
pressure and 1000 ꢀC for 40 min in a cubic-anvil-type high-pres-
sure apparatus, of which the details have been reported in ref (16,
The X-ray diffraction (XRD) was conducted on a Rigaku Ultima
VI (3 KW) diffractometer using Cu Ka radiation generated at 40 kV
and 40 mA. The Rietveld refinements on the diffraction patterns
were performed using GSAS software packages [18]. The dc mag-
netic susceptibility measurement was carried out using a super-
conducting quantum interference device (SQUID). The resistance
was measured by four-probe electrical conductivity methods in
physical property measuring system (PPMS).
The first-principles calculations based on density functional
theory implemented in VASP were carried out within a primitive
cell with an 8 ꢁ 8 ꢁ 16 k-point grid [19]. The projector augmented
wave pseudopotentials with Perdew, Burke, and Ernzerhof (PBE)
exchange-correlation and 450 eV energy cutoff were used in our
calculation [20,21]. The experimental lattice parameters from XRD
were adopted.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Crystal structure
Polycrystalline samples La3TiP5 and La3TiAs5 were prepared
under high-temperature and high-pressure conditions. Fig. 1(a and
b) displays the refinements for the XRDs of La3TiP5 and La3TiAs5,
respectively. Here, the structure of La3TiSb5 with the space group of
P63/mcm (193) was adopted as the initial model for the Rietveld
refinements [10], which smoothly converged to c2 ¼ 4.1, Rp ¼ 3.2%
and Rwp ¼ 5.2% for La3TiP5 and c2 ¼ 4.5, Rp ¼ 3.7% and Rwp ¼ 5.6% for
La3TiAs5. The summary of the crystallographic data is listed in
Table 1, and some selected important distances and angles are lis-
ted in Table 2. For comparing, the selected distances and angles of
isostructural La3TiSb5 and La3TiBi5 are listed in Table 2 as well. In
fact, we have tried the synthesis at ambient pressure via sealing the
precursors of LaAs(P), As(P) and Ti powders in an evacuated quartz
tube and sintering at different temperatures (800 ꢀC and 1000 ꢀC).
However, we didn’t obtain the samples of La3TiAs(P)5 at ambient
pressure. Since the quartz tube were intact during the ambient
pressure sintering process, it is speculated that the reason of failing
Fig. 4 presents the doping dependence of the bond angles
a of
X1-Ti-X1 in the TiX6 octahedrons (shown in Fig. 2(b)) and the dis-
tances of TieTi in TiX6 octahedral chains. The results reveal that all
the TiX6 octahedrons are slightly compressed along the c axis.
When X varies from large Sb atoms to smaller P atoms, the dis-
tances of TieTi decreases from 3.1385 Å to 2.8822 Å. For La3TiX5, the
TieTi distances are comparable with that in an elemental titanium
metal (~2.87e2.90 Å), which suggests that there exist bonding in-
teractions between corresponding Ti ions. In addition, the elec-
trostatic repulsion between Ti ions in the center of corresponding
face-sharing TiX6 octahedrons becomes stronger as the TieTi dis-
tance decreases, which tends to elongate the octahedrons. Thereby,
when X varies from Sb to P, the compression of TiX6 octahedrons is
partially released and the bond angles
a
increases from 87.329ꢀ to