F. Peiûker, L. Fischer / Bioorg. Med. Chem. 7 (1999) 2231±2237
2237
homogeneity. To this suspension 0.23 mL of ethylene
glycol dimethacrylate (EDMA) and 4 mg of AIBN were
added. The radical copolymerization was initiated by
Measurement of the CLIP's speci®c surface area. The
speci®c surface area was determined according to the
BET1
(Mikromeritics, Georgia, USA).
3,25
method using a Mikromeritics DeSorb 2300 A
ꢀ
UV irradiation at 366 nm at 4 C. After 5 h the resulting
polymer underwent three consecutive washing steps
each with 0.5 mL of cyclohexane. Finally the cross-
linked imprinted biocatalyst was dried under vacuum.
Determination of the CLIP's average particle size (APS).
The average particle size was measured with a Sympatec
HELOS particle analyzer (Sympatec, Germany).
Hydrolysis of N-acetyl-D-tryptophan ethyl ester. Ten
milligrams of CLIP was suspended into 1 mL of potas-
sium phosphate buer (0.01 M; pH 7.8), containing
N-acetyl-d-tryptophan ethyl ester (0.03 M). The reaction
Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of CLIP. SEM
pictures of CLIP (d)-CT were taken with a Zeiss DSM
982 Gemini after the samples had been sputtered with
Au.
ꢀ
mixture was incubated at 25 C at 1200 rpm with the
help of a thermomixer. At certain intervals 50 mL ali-
quots were taken, centrifuged and the supernatant was
diluted 1/40 prior to HPLC analysis (s. ester analysis).
To exclude any nonspeci®c, non-enzymatical hydrolysis,
this reaction was conducted with the polymer alone, the
substrate alone and the polymer, containing non-
imprinted enzyme.
Acknowledgement
L. Fischer thanks the FCI (Fonds der Chemischen
Industrie) for partial ®nancial support of his research.
References
Operational stability of CLIP (D-)-ꢀ-CT. After the
initial 120 h of CLIP (d-)-a-CT catalyzed d-ester
hydrolysis, CLIP (D-)-a-CT was centrifuged and wash-
ing steps using potassium phosphate buer were applied
until there was no longer any substrate/product detect-
able in the washing solutions. After drying the CLIP
1
2
5
3
4
. Perona, J. J.; Craik, C. S. Protein Sci. 1995, 4, 337.
. Shao, P.; Arnold, F. H. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 1996, 6,
13.
. Klibanov, A. M. Nature 1995, 374, 596.
Ê Ê
. Stahl, M.; Jeppsson-Wistrand, U.; Mansson, M.-O.;
Mosbach, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 9366.
. Gonzales-Navarro, H.; Braco, L. Biotechnol. Bioengin.
1998, 59, 122.
6. Mosbach, K.; Ramstro
7. Rich, J. O.; Dordick, J. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119,
(d-)-a-CT under vacuum ``fresh'' substrate solution was
5
Â
added and again the hydrolysis was conducted for
another 96 h. This procedure was done 3 times, so that
the total reaction time amounted to 408 h (17 days).
È
m, O. Bio/Technology 1996, 14, 163.
3
8
245.
. Johansson, A.; Mosbach, K.; Ma
Ê
nsson, M.-O. Eur. J. Bio-
Reuse of CLIP (D-)-ꢀ-CT and CLIP (D-)-SUB. After
the d-ester hydrolysis took place, the substrate and the
product were removed with dry cyclohexane as the
washing solution until these compounds were no longer
detectable by HPLC analysis. Then CLIP (d-)-a-CT/
CLIP (d)-SUB was dried under vacuum and the synth-
esis of N-acetyl-d-tryptophan ethyl ester was conducted
again (see above).
chem. 1995, 227, 551.
9
1
1
2
1
. Dabulis, K.; Klibanov, A. M. Biotech. Bioeng. 1992, 39,
76.
0. Slade, C. J.; Vulfson, E. N. Biotechnol. Bioengin. 1998, 57,
11.
1. Mishra, P.; Griebenow, K.; Klibanov, A. M. Biotechnol.
Bioengin 1996, 52, 609.
12. Halling, P. J. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 1994, 16, 178.
1
1
4
1
È
3. Haul, R.; Dumbgen, G. Chem.-Ing.-Tech. 1960, 32, 349.
4. Fischer, L.; Peiûker, F. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1998,
9, 129.
5. Prestrelski, S. J.; Arakawa, T.; Carpenter, J. F. Biophys. J.
Determination of the kinetic parameters Vmax and KM.
The kinetic constants were determined following the
initial velocities of the hydrolysis/synthesis reactions at
ꢀ
1993, 65, 661.
6. Wang, P.; Sergeeva, M. V.; Lim, L.; Dordick, J. S. Nature
Biotechnol. 1997, 15, 789.
7. Fischer, L.; Muller, R.; Ekbert, B.; Mosbach, K. J. Am.
25 C with increasing substrate concentrations up to
1
substrate saturation. The resulting hyperbolic satura-
tion curves were linearized according to Hanes. All
related transformations were conducted independently
of each other in triplicates.
1
È
Chem. Soc. 1991, 113, 9358.
18. Margolin, A. L. Trends Biotechnol. 1996, 14, 223.
19. Lalonde, J. J.; Govardhan, C.; Khalaf, N.; Martinez, A.
G.; Visuri, K.; Margolin, A. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117,
Calculation of reaction acceleration. The reaction accel-
eration was calculated by comparing two second-order
rate constants, knonenz for the non-enzymatic reaction
6
2
2
845.
0. Kirby, A. J. Acta Chem. Scand. 1996, 50, 203.
1. Fischer, L.; Peiûker, F. 1996, Patent, DE19627162 Cl.
{
matic reaction {venz=(kcat
vnonenz=knonenz [S] [Solvent] } and k
for the enzy-
enz
�
K ) [S] [E] }.
M
1
22. Hummel, B. C. W. Can. J. Biochem. Physiol. 1959, 37,
.
1
2
393.
3. Worthington Enzyme Manual; Worthington Biochem.
Active-site titration. The accessibility of low-molecular
compounds to the active-site of a-chymotrypsin was
determined by titrating the enzyme with N-trans-cin-
Corp.; Freehold: New Jersey, 1972; pp 129±131.
4. Schonbaum, G. R.; Zerner, B.; Bender, M. L. J. Biol.
Chem. 1961, 236, 2930.
25. Haul, R.; Dumbgen, G. Chem. Ing. Tech. 1963, 35, 349.
2
2
4
nyamoylimidazol as described elsewhere.
È