8016
I P Raevski et al
At definite pressure and annealing temperature, Ta, there exists a definite equilibrium
concentration of VO. We emphasize that this concentration can be thought to be in
equilibrium if Ta is high enough to allow the diffusion processes to end in a few hours
during which one makes the thermal treatments of the sample. When further decreasing
the temperature in vacuum the concentration of VO cannot change because of the above-
mentioned circumstances and, because of this, it remains constant. Hence one may reduce
a sample at a high temperature and, further, measure the conductivity at lower temperatures
in vacuum. In this case the concentration of the main point defects, VO, would be a constant
and the experimental curves should be reproducible. We will show here how it is possible
to evaluate the energies of the trap levels connected with VO.
It should be noted that in our procedure much attention has been concentrated on
the measurement time of each of the points of the temperature–conductivity plot. Indeed
measuring the points is accompanied by some restoration processes. These processes are
of two types. The first is connected with the relaxation of the electron subsystem and local
lattice distortion near point defects (e.g., VO). The second can stem from changing the
concentration of the point defects. It is obvious that the first process is much faster in
comparison with the second. Indeed, at 900 K, SrTiO3 and BaTiO3 ceramics require (1–
5
3
)×10 s for full equilibration [11] whereas, at the same temperature, the period of time for
2
the conductivity measurement does not exceed 10 s after an equilibrium VO concentration
has been achieved at this or a higher temperature. The former figure is the result of a
careful experimental investigation of oxygen diffusion in the perovskite-type lattice. The
latter figure is the result of our experience. It is based on the evidence that, after the
above-mentioned period of time, conductivity does not change within the experimental
error (usually 3–4%). As the temperature lowers the difference between the measuring and
defect equilibrium restoration times increases dramatically. While, for example, at 600 K,
3
the former does not exceed 10 s, the latter (estimated using the oxygen diffusion coefficient
value obtained by the extrapolation of data from [10] to T = 600 K) is of the order of
11
10
s. This estimation is consistent with the conclusion of [9] that, in the temperature
range below approximately 600 K, the changes of charge carrier concentrations in titanates
are only the result of changes in the degree of the ionization of defects but not the result
of changes in the total concentrations of the defects.
If full equilibration was achieved at each of the measuring points then the slope of the
logarithm of conductivity against reverse temperature would correspond to the sum of the
electron trapping energy, Wt , formation energy of VO, Wf , and the activation energy of mo-
bility, Wµ. It will be shown later, that in the OPFs studied, Wµ can be neglected as compared
to Wt . As in the course of the experiment the concentration of VO does not change, the en-
ergy of the formation of VO should not be taken into account. If one took it into account then
the total activation energy of carriers in the conduction band would be of the order of a few
electronvolts (the known values of Wf are almost the same for all the perovskites under con-
sideration, namely 5.4–6.0 eV for SrTiO3 [16, 17], BaTiO3 [9, 18] and KTaO3 [19]). In fact
we observed only small activation energies of the order of a few tenths of an electronvolt.
This indirectly supports our assumption that the time required for the restoration of the equi-
librium concentration of VO is much longer than the measuring time under the experimental
conditions used. However, we should emphasize that the measuring time is longer than
the electron and local lattice relaxation time. Additional support for this assumption gives
evidence of the depletion of the donor’s levels in our experiment. It is obvious that if the con-
centration of the point defects was not a constant then the depletion region would not be seen.
It should be mentioned that, for the present investigation, only the donor/acceptor
compensation ratio but not the absolute values of either the donor or acceptor concentration