A R T I C L E S
Yang et al.
7
co-workers also via self-templating routes. These self-templat-
ing processes consist of two steps, first fabrication of precursors
as sacrificial templates and then transformation to final hollow
structures via the Kirkendall effect.
To avoid complicated operations, one-step template-free
methods have also been widely employed for efficient produc-
tion of nonspherical hollow structures. A general procedure of
the template-free strategy can be described as (1) surfactant-
assisted self-aggregation of primary building blocks and (2)
development of the hollow interior via an Ostwald ripening
8
process as observed in the formation of PbTe nanoboxes,
9
10
CaTiO
3
, and Cu
2
O
hollow cubes. According to the previous
reports, the shells of the as-obtained inorganic cage-like hollow
architectures were mostly polycrystalline or built up by oriented
aggregration of nanocrystallites. Detailed formation mechanisms
of the aggregation and the microstructures of the shells have
not been investigated extensively. In the present work, we focus
Figure 1. Powder XRD patterns of the CaTiO
3
specimens produced with
different water contents in the synthetic solutions: (a) water-free, (b) 1.25
vol %, and (c) 5 vol %. The bottom pattern with vertical bars is derived
from the JCPDS card (No. 82-0229, space group Pbnm) of orthorhombic
on the formation mechanism of hollow crystals of CaTiO
different microstructures in order to enrich our knowledge of
this field of materials science.
3
with
CaTiO
and pattern (c) is indexed to the orthorhombic unit cell with a ) 5.4033, b
5.4406, and c ) 7.6653 Å.
3
. Pattern (a) is indexed to the pseudocubic subcell with a ≈ 3.84 Å,
)
The mineral perovskite CaTiO
and practical importance in many disciplines such as mineral-
3
is of both fundamental interest
early stages of the crystal growth are studied, and a detailed
formation mechanism of these hollow crystals is established.
1
1
12
13
ogy, solid-state chemistry, materials sciences, electronic
Experimental Section
1
4
15
engineering, and even biotechnology due to its unique
structure, easy fabrication, high stability, and biocompatibility.
Much effort has been devoted to its synthesis, structural analysis,
and application as an electronic or optical material. In our
3
Synthesis. The synthetic method for CaTiO hollow crystals was
9
similar to that described in our previous report with a minor
modification. For sample I, 1.0 mmol of solid calcium nitrate,
3 2
Ca(NO ) , was directly dissolved in 19.67 mL of PEG -200 solvent
without adding any water. An ultrasonic treatment was performed to
enhance the dissolution of the calcium nitrate powder, and then 0.33
preliminary research, one type of CaTiO
3
hollow cage has been
produced. However, our knowledge of the formation of this
hollow CaTiO and other hollow crystals is still very limited.
Herein, we report three different types of microstructured
CaTiO hollow crystals synthesized via a simple poly(ethylene
9
4 9 4
mL of tetrabutyltitanate [titanium n-butoxide, Ti(OC H ) , TNB] was
3
added dropwise into the solution under vigorous stirring, followed by
addition of 22 mmol of sodium hydroxide powder under stirring to
serve as the mineralization reagent. Subsequently, the mixture feed-
stock was transferred into a Teflon-lined stainless steel autoclave for
solvothermal treatment at 180 °C for 15 h. The vessel was then cooled
to ambient temperature. The precipitate was recovered by centrifuga-
tion, washed with acetone, diluted acetic acid, and distilled water, and
then dried in a desiccator at ambient temperature.
3
glycol) 200 (PEG-200)-assisted solvothermal procedure but with
varying small amounts of water in the solution. In particular,
(
(
6) (a) Cao, H. L.; Qian, X. F.; Wang, C.; Ma, X. D.; Yin, J.; Zhu, Z. K.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 16024–16025. (b) Jiao, S. H.; Xu, L. F.;
Jiang, K.; Xu, D. S. AdV. Mater. 2006, 18, 1174–1177. (c) Zhang,
W. X.; Chen, Z. X.; Yang, Z. H. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2009, 11,
For samples II and III, the precursor for Ca, Ca(NO
was replaced by aqueous Ca(NO solution (4.0 and 1.0 M,
respectively). The volume ratios of Ca(NO solution to PEG-200
3 2
) powder,
3 2
)
3 2
)
6
263–6268.
are adjusted to 0.25 mL (4.0 M):19.42 mL for sample II and 1.00
mL (1.0 M):18.67 mL for sample III, corresponding to water
contents of 1.25 and 5 vol %, respectively, in the final solutions
after addition of 0.33 mL of TNB. For examination of early-stage
crystals, specimens after shorter reaction times, e.g., 1, 2, and 5 h,
were also collected for each sample.
7) (a) Chen, J. Y.; McLellan, J. M.; Siekkinen, A.; Xiong, Y. J.; Li, Z. Y.;
Xia, Y. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 14776–14777. (b) Lu, X. M.;
Au, L.; McLellan, J.; Li, Z. Y.; Marquez, M.; Xia, Y. N. Nano Lett.
2
007, 7, 1764–1769.
(
(
8) Wang, W. Z.; Poudel, B.; Wang, D. Z.; Ren, Z. F. AdV. Mater. 2005,
1
7, 2110–2114.
9) Yang, X.; Williams, I. D.; Chen, J.; Wang, J.; Xu, H.; Konishi, H.;
Characterization. The powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns
of the products were recorded with a Rigaku D/MAX 2200 VPC
diffractometer using Cu KR radiation (λ ) 0.15406 nm) and a
graphite monochromator. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM)
images were taken using an FEI Quanta 400 Thermal FE scanning
electron microscope. The samples for transmission electron mi-
croscopy (TEM) studies were prepared by dispersing the powder
specimen on a holey carbon film supported on a copper grid, and
the images were recorded on a JEOL JEM-2010HR electron
microscope operated at 200 kV and equipped with a Gatan GIF
Tridiem system.
Pan, Y.; Liang, C.; Wu, M. J. Mater. Chem. 2008, 18, 3543–3546.
(
(
10) Teo, J. J.; Chang, Y.; Zeng, H. C. Langmuir 2006, 22, 7369–7377.
11) Hu, M. S.; Wenk, H. R.; Sinitsyna, D. Am. Mineral. 1992, 77, 359–
3
73.
12) Mather, G. C.; Islam, M. S.; Figueiredo, F. M. AdV. Funct. Mater.
007, 17, 905–912.
(
(
2
13) (a) Lee, W. T.; Salje, E. K. H.; Goncalves-Ferreira, L.; Daraktchiev,
M.; Bismayer, U. Phys. ReV. B 2006, 73, 214110. (b) Huang, Y. J.;
Chiu, H. T.; Lee, C. Y. CrystEngComm 2009, 11, 1904–1909. (c)
Huang, Y. J.; Tsai, M. C.; Chiu, H. T.; Sheu, H. S.; Lee, C. Y. Cryst.
Growth Des. 2010, 10, 1221–1225. (d) Wang, D. A.; Guo, Z. G.; Chen,
Y. M.; Hao, J.; Liu, W. M. Inorg. Chem. 2007, 46, 7707–7709. (e)
Croker, D.; Loan, M.; Hodnett, B. K. Cryst. Growth Des. 2009, 9,
2
207–2213.
Results and Discussion
(
(
14) Wang, X. S.; Xu, C. N.; Yamada, H.; Nishikubo, K.; Zheng, X. G.
AdV. Mater. 2005, 17, 1254–1261.
The three samples produced with different contents of water
in the synthetic solutions gave very similar XRD patterns as
shown in Figure 1. All the diffraction peaks can be indexed to
15) Inoue, M.; Rodriguez, A. P.; Takagi, T.; Katase, N.; Kubota, M.; Nagai,
N.; Nagatsuka, H.; Nagaoka, N.; Takagi, S.; Suzuki, K. J. Biomater.
Appl. 2010, 24, 657–672.
1
4280 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. 9 VOL. 132, NO. 40, 2010