A R T I C L E S
Aggarwal et al.
Scheme 10. Epoxidation of 1-Phenylcyclohexene Using the
Corresponding Secondary, Tertiary, and Quaternary Ammonium
Salts as Catalyst
Table 3. Variation of the Amount of Water
CH CN/H O ratioa
yield (%)b
ee (%)d,e
but discounted this mechanism on the basis of the lack of activity
of quaternary ammonium salts. These results show that the
protonated ammonium salts are uniquely effective in the
epoxidation process and that the more N-H’s there are available
the more effective is the catalyst in terms of both conversion
and enantioselectivity.
entry
3
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
95/5
93
90
92
60c
20c
8c
46
42
38
33
40
31
90/10
75/25
50/50
25/75
5/95
It now seems that the protonated ammonium salts serve a
dual role. Not only do they act as PTCs and help bring the
oxidant into solution, but we now believe that they also activate
the peroxymonosulfate, through hydrogen bonding, generating
a more electrophilic species.23 There are a number of possible
peroxymonosulfate-ammonium salt complexes, which can be
formed with amine 1 and they all activate the oxidant either
directly (II, III) or indirectly (I) (Scheme 11). The different
complexes clearly place the peroxy group in a different steric
environment, and this is likely to be a factor responsible for
the moderate enantioselectivity observed. The key to enhancing
the selectivity is to reduce the number of reactive complexes
or to engineer complexes so that one complex is considerably
more reactive than the others. Nevertheless, the high levels of
enantioselectivity observed are remarkable, considering the fact
that oxone is complexed to the chiral amine without covalent
bonds, especially considering that such levels of selectivity have
never been achieved in chiral peracid mediated epoxidations
(<15%)24 where the oxidant is coValently attached to the chiral
controller.
a Standard conditions: 1-phenylcyclohexene (0.424 mmol), Oxone (0.848
mmol), NaHCO3 (4.24 mmol), pyridine (0.212 mmol), MeCN:H2O (0.5
mL), 1‚HCl (0.042 mmol). b Yields determined by 1H NMR relative to an
internal standard (p-dimethoxybenzene). c Remainder is alkene. d Enantio-
selectivities determined by chiral GC using a R-CD column. e The epoxides
have the (S,S) configuration. The absolute configuration was determined
by comparison of the optical rotation with literature data.
the inorganic ions in preference to the lipophilic complex 6b
reducing its ability to break up this ion pair.
The difficulty in obtaining consistent and reproducible results
starting with the amine can now be understood if the rate of
protonation to form the salt 6a is slow and variable. In this
case amine degradation can occur through oxidation, giving rise
to different potential catalyst species, which will have different
activities. Rate of protonation versus oxidation could vary for
different reactions as it will depend on the amount of Oxone
and bicarbonate in solution which in turn will depend on the
particle size of Oxone and NaHCO3 and the rate of stirring (the
reaction mixture is heterogeneous). Starting with the protonated
amine salt, the amine is effectively protected from oxidation
and leads to completely reproducible results.
Scheme 11. Possible Forms of Peroxymonosulfate Ammonium 6b
Conclusions
In summary, the following evidence supports the intermediacy
of pyrrolidinium peroxymonosulfate 6b as the active oxidizing
species in the amine catalyzed epoxidation process: (i) a
complex was isolated containing the peroxymonosulfate salt 6b
which showed identical results when used in stoichiometric
amounts compared to catalytic amounts of the hydrochloride
salt of amine 1 and Oxone, (ii) the amine could be reisolated in
essentially quantitative yield, showing that it was protonated
(and therefore protected) throughout the oxidation process when
the reaction was conducted at -10 °C and not irreversibly
oxidized to the corresponding amine radical cation, (iii) the
relative rates of oxidation of structurally similar alkenes were
closer to those observed in m-CPBA oxidations than radical
cation mediated processes, (iv) the F value for oxidizing a series
of arylcyclohexenes was much closer (and smaller) to m-CPBA
oxidations than radical cation mediated processes, indicating
that the process involved an electrophilic oxidant.
If this proposal is correct, increased solvation of the am-
monium peroxymonosulfate 6b should not only result in a
reduction in rate of epoxidation but also in the enantioselectivity.
To test this, reactions were conducted in MeCN with increasing
concentrations of water (Table 3) (for the effect of other solvents
on epoxidation, see Supporting Information). Indeed, as the
water content was increased, both conversion and enantio-
selectivity generally decreased.25 However, the decrease was
not as precipitous as we had expected perhaps because of the
high salt content of the reaction. Water would no doubt solvate
(23) Protonated Oxone (i.e. Oxone at low pH) is a powerful electrophilic oxidant.
See: Zhu, W.; Ford, W. T. J. Org. Chem. 1991, 56, 7022-7026.
(24) (a) Ewins, R. C.; Henbest, H. B.; McKervey, M. A. Chem. Commun. 1967,
1085-1086. (b) Bowman, R. M.; Collins, J. F.; Grundon, M. F. Chem.
Commun. 1967, 1131-1132. (c) Montarani, F.; Moretti, I.; Torre, G. Chem.
Commun. 1969, 135-136. (d) Bowman, R. M.; Collins, J. F.; Grundon,
M. F. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. I 1972, 626-632. (e) Pirkle, W. H.;
Rinaldi, P. L. J. Org. Chem. 1977, 42, 2080-2082. (f) Rebek, J., Jr.;
McCready, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 5602-5605.
(26) There are examples of protonated ammonium salts directing epoxidation
through hydrogen bonding with the oxidant (m-CPBA or dimethyloxirane)
whilst quaternary ammonium salts gave opposite selectivity. See: (a)
Asensio, G.; Gonza´lez-Nu´n˜ez, M. E.; Boix-Bernardini, C.; Mello, R.; Adam,
W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 7250-7253. (b) Asensio, G.; Boix-
Bernardini, C.; Andreu, C.; Gonza´lez-Nu´n˜ez, M. E.; Mello, R.; Edwards,
J. O.; Carpenter, G. B. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 4705-4711. These reactions
(25) We cannot account for the small increase in ee in the 25/75 mixture of
MeCN/H2O (Table 3, entry 5).
9
7600 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 125, NO. 25, 2003