Evaluation Only. Created with Aspose.PDF. Copyright 2002-2021 Aspose Pty Ltd.
16 Mokhtari et al.
Asian J. Chem.
selective, while derivatives (16, 17) showed a high selectivity
towards potassium. For conformers (16, 17) no extraction
tendency was found for cesium and rubidium cations. However,
for all conformers one or two-step bindings for sodium cations
were obtained as shown in Table-1. For ligands with two-step
bindings at the same binding site or two binding sites, the first
binding is often stronger than the second by at least two orders
of magnitude in the K values. The exceptions are symmetric
conformers (10, 12, 13), in which the K values are same. The
comparison of log K for the first binding is more significant.
The interaction of alkali metal cations with two nitrogen donors
of the N-phenyl-sulfonyl carboxamides substituents is not
favourable due to the steric repulsion. The proposed binding
sites may be contributed by ion-dipole interaction of one
alkali metal cation with one nitrogen donor of the N-phenyl-
sulfonyl carboxamides substituent. According to Table-1, the
conformers 7, 8 exhibited one-step binding and slightly weaker
binding affinity towards sodium cations than 9, 10. Fig. 6 (C1)
depicted a proposed model for binding of cone calix[4]arene
conformer 7 towards sodium cations. In similar way, the
conformer 8 binds to the sodium cations.
TABLE-1
STOICHIOMETRIES AND BINDING CONSTANTS FOR
INTERACTION OF SODIUM WITH CONFORMERS 7-17
The bindings of 9-13 with alkali metal cations exhibited
two-steps mechanisms. In the first step, one metal cation is
bonded with one or two nitrogen atoms at the lower rim. The
second step is proposed when another metal cation is bonded
to the other side of calixarenic scaffold. As show in Table-1,
in conformer 9 the first step of binding is stronger than the
second with 3.2 orders of magnitude difference in K values
towards sodium cations. On the other hand, owing to the steric
symmetry of conformers 10, 12, 13 there were not any signi-
ficant differences in the K values towards sodium cations.
Fig. 6 (C2 and C3) illustrated the schematic of the first step as
well as the second step for 1,3 alternate conformer 10 (also 9).
According to Table-1, in conformers 11-13 there are two
steps for binding to sodium cations, in which both of them are
presented schematically in Fig. 6 (C4 and C5). Among three
conformers in form of 1,2 alternate, derivatives 12, 13 are
symmetric and there are not any difference in K values towards
sodium cations, as presented in Table-1. While in conformer
11, the first step binding is stronger than the second step
because of a two-way interaction between cation and the
calixarene scaffold including the cation-π interaction between
alkali metal cation and the inverted aromatic units in confor-
mers as well as the ion-dipole interaction with the nitrogen
atoms on the lower rim. Fig. 6 (C4 and C5) shows the schematic
of the first and the second steps for 1,2 alternate conformer 11
(also conformers 12, 13).
Binding
stages
Conformers
n1
log K1
n2
log K2
7
1
1
2
2
2
2
2
1
1
1
1
0.58
0.62
0.92
0.80
0.42
0.50
0.50
0.26
0.24
0.12
0.18
6.36 0.08
6.54 0.06
-
-
-
-
8
9
7.87 0.08 0.72
7.70 0.10 0.80
4.31 0.02 0.53
3.12 0.04 0.50
3.11 0.03 0.50
4.64 0.02
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
7.68 0.08
3.48 0.05
3.13 0.04
3.13 0.03
1.11 0.02
1.00 0.01
0.64 0.01
0.68 0.01
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Calix[4]arene derivatives (7,8) in cone conformation
showed clear one-step binding. Derivatives (9-13) depicted
two-step binding towards with log K differences of 1 to 3
between the first and second binding constants. Conformers
(14-17) in partial-cone conformer showed one-site binding.
The raw data from isothermal titration calorimetry experiments
using conformers (8-11) is showed in Fig. 4, respectively.
Influence of the conformation variation: Conforma-
tional variation had an important influence on cation binding
affinity for conformers (7-17). As shown in Table-1, the log K
values for sodium binding decreased from the 1,2-alternate
conformation to the partial-cone conformers. In this case, the
isothermal titration calorimetry results were consistent with
the solvent extraction results, which are illustrated in Fig. 5.
In the solvent extraction results, the 2-alternate conformers
(14, 15) did not show outstanding extraction selectivity.
Sodium cations could have an ion-dipole interaction with
the nitrogen atoms on the lower rim of cone conformers 7, 8.
However, the binding is not contributed to the π interaction
between alkali metal cation and the aromatic units in confor-
mers due to opposite situation of them. The bindings of 7, 8
with alkali metal cations both exhibited one-step mechanism.
Base upon the data in Table-1, in conformers 14-17 an
one-step binding to sodium cations was distinguished.An ion-
dipole interaction between sodium and nitrogen atom(s) as
well as a weak π interaction between cation and the inverted
aromatic unit in conformers is responsible for complex forma-
tion. A second stage binding towards sodium cations was not
distinguished and it shows that the steric affect in the upper
rim of partial-cone conformers 14-17 constraints the binding
mechanism to one-step. Such steric affect was related to three
t-butyl moieties on the upper rim. Fig. 6 (C6) depicted the
binding schematic for conformer 16 as well as 14, 15, 17.
60
60
60
58
58
58
58
56
56
56
56
54
52
50
48
46
54
52
50
48
54
54
52
52
50
50
0
50
100
150
0
50
100
150
0
50
100
150
0
50
100
150
Time (min)
Time (min)
Time (min)
Time (min)
Fig. 4. Raw data from isothermal titration calorimetry titrations present one-step binding for 8-11 scaffolds towards Rb+