Organic Process Research & Development 2003, 7, 936−938
A Kinetic Study of 2-Ethyl-1-hexanol Oxidation by Dichromate Using
Clay-Supported 1-Butyl 4-aza-1-azonia Bicyclo[2.2.2]octane Chloride as the
Phase-Transfer Catalyst
M. Ghiaci,* R. J. Kalbasi, and M. E. Sedaghat
Department of Chemistry, Isfahan UniVersity of Technology, Isfahan, Iran, 84156
Abstract:
in catalyzing aqueous-organic biphase reactions. Interest in
such phase-transfer and related two-phase catalytic tech-
niques continues to grow in synthetic and mechanistic
organic chemistry.14,15 It seems that the development of a
technique which uses insoluble catalysts to accelerate aque-
ous-organic phase reactions would not only be an interesting
possibility but would also reinforce claims16-18 that the future
of synthetic organic chemistry rests with heterogeneous
media rather than the currently predominant homogeneous
systems. Modified-clay constitutes one such medium.
Our main purpose in this study was to examine the
usefulness of surfactant-modified clay for oxidation of an
industrially important lipophilic alcohol, i.e., 2-ethyl-1-
hexanol. The other goal was to introduce easily made
surfactant-modified clay to be compared with a series of
cross-linked polystyrene resins bearing quaternary am-
monium groups.19-22
Selective oxidation of primary alcohols to aldehydes is a long-
standing problem of organic chemistry (Bueler, C. A.; Pearson,
D. E. SurWey of Organic Synthesis; Wiley-Interscience: New
York, 1977; Vol. 2, p 480; House, H. O. Modern Synthetic
Reactions, 2nd. ed.; W. A. Benjamin: Menlo Park, California,
1972; p 257; Epstein, W. W.; Sweet, F. W. Chem. ReW. 1967,
67, 247; Landini, D.; Montanari, F.; Rolla, F. Synthesis 1979,
134). The use of potassium dichromate as a synthetically useful
oxidizing agent is reported for the oxidation of an industrially
important lipophilic alcohol, employing modified clay as the
phase-transfer catalyst. The phase-transfer catalysis results in
nearly complete oxidation of the 2-ethylhexanol in 40 min at
room temperature, with high selectivity to the 2-ethylhexanal,
compared to 48 h in its absence. Kinetic studies show the
reaction occurs via transfer of Cr2O72- into the organic phase.
The emphasis will be on simplicity of the condition as a
preparative organic method, selectivity with regard to over-
oxidation, efficiency, and mildness of conditions.
Results and Discussion
1-Butyl-4-aza-1-azonia bicyclo[2.2.2]octane chloride was
selected as the surfactant for modifying the clay. On the basis
of preliminary phase distribution studies of dichromate
between the aqueous phase and various organic solvents
(petroleum ether, cyclohexane, toluene, carbon tetrachloride,
chloroform, and methylene chloride) petroleum ether was
selected because of the phase-transferred Cr2O72- concentra-
tion in this solvent remains relatively constant during several
hours of stirring with surfactant present.
According to the mechanism proposed by Wiberg23 for
oxidation of alcohols by KMnO4 in the biphasic system, we
proposed eqs 1, 2, and 3 as the overall stoichiometry of the
oxidation reaction.
Introduction
A significant and recurring problem facing the synthetic
organic chemist5,6 is how to effectively carry out reaction
between a water-soluble reagent and a water-insoluble
substrate. When reaction is attempted as an aqueous-organic
biphase process, very low rates are usually observed due to
the low concentration of at least one of the compounds in
each phase. Rapid stirring has been shown, in certain cases,
to have an accelerating effect by increasing the surface
contact between the layers and thereby increasing the
interfacial component of the reaction.7,8 Soluble ammonium
and phosphonium salts,9 as well as crown ethers,10,11
cryptands,12 and surfactants13 have proven extremely useful
Results When No PTC was Used. To establish a blank
for the phase-transfer catalyzed system, the reaction rate for
the oxidation of 2-ethylhexanol by dichromate in the biphasic
* Corresponding author. E-mail: mghiaci@cc.iut.ac.ir. Fax: +98-311-391-
2350.
(1) Buehler, C. A.; Pearson, D. E. SurVey of Organic Synthesis; Wiley-
(14) Yadav, G. D.; Haldavanekar, B. V. J. Phys. Chem. A 1997, 101, 36.
(15) Mukhopadhyay, J. K.; Mukhopadhyaya, D. E.; Ponde, D. E.; Cohen, S.;
Kurkalli, B. G. S. Org. Process Res. DeVel. 2000, 4, 509.
(16) Laszlo, P., Ed. PreparatiVe Chemistry using Supported Reagents; Academic
Press: San Diego, 1987.
(17) Balogh, M.; Laszlo, P. Organic Chemistry Using Clays; Springer: Berlin,
1993.
(18) Varma, R. S. Tetrahedron 2002, 58, 1235.
(19) Regen, S. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 5956.
(20) Desikan, S.; Doraiswamy, L. K. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2000, 55, 6119.
(21) Annunziata, R.; Benaglia, M.; Cinquini, M.; Cozzi, F.; Tocco, G. Org.
Lett. 2000, 2, 1737.
(22) Wu, H. S.; Lee, C. S. J. Catal. 2001, 199, 217.
(23) Wiberg, K. B. Oxidation in Organic Chemistry, Part A; Academic Press:
New York and London, 1965.
Interscience: New York, 1977; Vol. 2, p 480.
(2) House, H. O. Modern Synthetic Reactions, 2nd. ed.; W. A. Benjamin:
Menlo Park, California, 1972; p 257.
(3) Epstein, W. W.; Sweet, F. W. Chem. ReV. 1967, 67, 247.
(4) Landini, D.; Montanari, F.; Rolla, F. Synthesis 1979, 134.
(5) Dehmlow, E. V. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1974, 13, 170.
(6) Regen, S. L. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 1979, 18, 421.
(7) Menger, F. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1970, 92, 5965.
(8) Tomita, A.; Ebina, N.; Tamai, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 99, 5725.
(9) Starks, C. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1971, 93, 195.
(10) Pedersen, C. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1967, 89, 2495.
(11) Sam, D. J.; Simmons, H. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1972, 94, 4024.
(12) Lehn, J. M. Struct. Bonding 1973, 16, 1.
(13) Menger, F. M.; Rhee, J. U.; Rhee, H. K. J. Org. Chem. 1975, 40, 3803.
936
•
Vol. 7, No. 6, 2003 / Organic Process Research & Development
10.1021/op034120d CCC: $25.00 © 2003 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 10/23/2003