ensure complete phase separation. After the volume of the top
and bottom phases was recorded, the sample was collected from
the bottom IL-rich phase for analysis. A mass balance check was
made between the initial mass of the protein and the amounts in
the lower and upper phases on the basis of equilibrium compo-
sitions. The relative error in the mass balance is within 3%. To
avoid interference from the phase components, the samples were
diluted and analyzed against the blanks containing the same
phase components but without protein. The protein concentration
in both phases were determined by measuring the absorbance at
repeated three times for a given sample, and good reproducibility
was obtained for the T values.
c
Acknowledgements
This work was supported financially by the National Natural
Science Foundation of China (no. 21133009), the Innovation
Scientists and Technicians Troop Construction Projects of Henan
Province (no. 092101510300), and the foundation of Shanghai
Key Laboratory of Green Chemistry and Chemical Processes.
2
80 nm using a Shanghai 752N UV-vis spectrophotometer.
Partition coefficients (K) and extraction efficiencies (E%) of the
proteins were calculated by using the equations:
References
K ¼ Cb=Ct
ð2Þ
ð3Þ
1
M. A. P. Martins, C. P. Frizzo, D. N. Moreira, N. Zanatta and
H. G. Bonacorso, Chem. Rev., 2008, 108, 2015–2050.
2 N. V. Plechkova and K. R. Seddon, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2008, 37, 123–150.
E% ¼ CbVb=C0V0 ꢂ 100%
3
P. Wasserscheid and W. Keim, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2000, 39,
3772–3789.
where C and C are the equilibrium concentrations of the parti-
b
t
tioned proteins in the IL-rich phase and in the polymer-rich
4 X. Han and D. W. Armstrong, Acc. Chem. Res., 2007, 40, 1079–1086.
A. Pinkert, K. N. Marsh, S. Pang and M. P. Staiger, Chem. Rev., 2009,
09, 6712–6728.
6 K. R. Seddon, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 1997, 68, 351–356.
7 W. L. Hough, M. Smiglak, H. Rodriguez, R. P. Swatloski, S. K. Spear,
D. T. Daly, J. Pernak, J. E. Grisel, R. D. Carliss, M. D. Soutullo,
J. H. Davis Jr. and R. D. Rogers, New J. Chem., 2007, 31, 1429–1436.
5
phase, respectively. V is the volume of the IL-rich phase, C is
b
0
1
the initial concentration of the proteins in water, and V is the
0
volume of the aqueous phase added into the test tube before the
separation process.
8
P. Anastas and J. C. Warner, Green Chemistry: Theory and Practice,
Oxford University Press, USA, 2000.
Determination of trypsin activity in the aqueous IL solutions.
9
M. Petkovic, K. R. Seddon, L. P. N. Rebelo and C. Silva Pereira, Chem.
Soc. Rev., 2011, 40, 1383–1403.
Trypsin activity in aqueous IL solutions was measured with the
45
BAEE method at pH 7.6 and 25 °C. The experimental appar-
atus employed is essentially the same as that used previously by
1
0 M. Petkovic, J. L. Ferguson, H. Q. N. Gunaratne, R. Ferreira,
M. C. Leitão, K. R. Seddon, L. P. N. Rebelo and C. S. Pereira, Green
Chem., 2010, 12, 643–649.
2
5
us. The spectrophotometrical measurements were carried out at
53 nm with a Shanghai 752N UV-vis spectrophotometer using
11 Y. Fukaya, Y. Iizuka, K. Sekikawa and H. Ohno, Green Chem., 2007, 9,
2
1155–1157.
a 1 cm cell. Aqueous solutions of the ILs were prepared at differ-
ent concentrations by dissolving the pure ILs in water, and then
trypsin was added to the ILs solutions. 0.2 ml of trypsin solution
was added to 3.0 ml of 0.5 mM BAEE solution containing
12 J. K. Blusztajn, Science, 1998, 281, 794.
13 S. Hu, T. Jiang, Z. Zhang, A. Zhu, B. Han, J. Song, Y. Xie and W. Li,
Tetrahedron Lett., 2007, 48, 5613–5617.
1
4 P. Moriel, E. J. García-Suárez, M. Martínez, A. B. García, M. A. Montes-
Morán, V. Calvino-Casilda and M. A. Bãnares, Tetrahedron Lett., 2010,
51, 4877–4881.
1
00 mM Tris buffer and 10 mM CaCl , followed by immediate
2
15 Y. H. Yu, X. M. Lu, Q. Zhou, K. Dong, H. W. Yao and S. J. Zhang,
Chem.–Eur. J., 2008, 14, 11174–11182.
mixing by inversion. The A253 nm was recorded every 0.5 min at
5 °C for about 5 min. The measurements were performed in tri-
plicate, and then an average was obtained. Trypsin activity was
2
16 K. D. Weaver, H. J. Kim, J. Sun, D. R. MacFarlane and G. D. Elliott,
Green Chem., 2010, 12, 507–513.
4
6
calculated by the literature method. Here, the activity of the
extracted trypsin or trypsin in aqueous IL solution was expressed
17 Q. Liu, X. Hou, N. Li and M. Zong, Green Chem., 2012, 14, 304–307.
18 K. E. Gutowski, G. A. Broker, H. D. Willauer, J. G. Huddleston,
R. P. Swatloski, J. D. Holbrey and R. D. Rogers, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
by the relative activity (U ) which is defined by the following
r
2
003, 125, 6632–6633.
19 Z. Li, Y. Pei, H. Wang, J. Fan and J. Wang, TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem.,
010, 29, 1336–1346.
equation:
2
Ur ¼ Ue=Un ꢂ 100%
ð4Þ
20 M. G. Freire, C. M. S. S. Neves, I. M. Marrucho, J. N. C. Lopes,
L. P. N. Rebelo and J. A. P. Coutinho, Green Chem., 2010, 12,
1715–1718.
where U (U mg− ) is the activity of trypsin in the tested media
1
e
−1
2
1 F. J. Deive, A. Rodríguez, A. B. Pereiro, J. M. M. Araújo, M. A. Longo,
M. A. Z. Coelho, J. N. C. Lopes, J. M. S. S. Esperanc, L. P. N. Rebelo
and I. M. Marrucho, Green Chem., 2011, 13, 390–396.
(
IL-rich phase and aqueous IL solutions), and U (U mg ) is
the activity of trypsin dissolved in water with the same trypsin
concentration.
n
22 J. F. B. Pereira, Á. S. Lima, M. G. Freire and J. A. P. Coutinho, Green
Chem., 2010, 12, 1661–1669.
2
2
3 Y. Pei, Z. Li, L. Liu and J. Wang, J. Chromatogr., A, 2012, 1231, 2–7.
4 Q. Cao, L. Quan, C. He, N. Li, K. Li and F. Liu, Talanta, 2008, 77,
160–165.
Determination of the cloud point temperatures. The cloud
47
point temperature (T ) was determined by visual observation.
c
2
5 Y. Pei, J. Wang, K. Wu, X. Xuan and X. Lu, Sep. Purif. Technol., 2009,
A glass tube containing the sample solution was immersed in a
water bath, the temperature of which was maintained using a
DC-2006 water thermostat. The temperature was raised at a rate
64, 288–295.
2
6 S. P. M. Ventura, S. G. Sousa, M. G. Freire, L. S. Serafim, Á. S. Lima
and J. A. P. Coutinho, J. Chromatogr., B, 2011, 879, 2679–2687.
−1
of approximately 0.5 °C min . As soon as the temperature was
higher than the cloud point temperature, the sample was cooled
27 Y. Lu, W. Lu, W. Wang, Q. Guo and Y. Yang, Talanta, 2011, 85,
621–1626.
1
2
8 M. G. Freire, A. F. M. Cláudio, J. M. M. Araújo, J. A. P. Coutinho,
I. M. Marrucho, J. N. C. Lopes and L. P. N. Rebelo, Chem. Soc. Rev.,
2012, 41, 4966–4995.
below T , and then it was heated again to check the reproduci-
c
bility of the measurements. The heating–cooling cycle was
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012
Green Chem.