CHEMCATCHEM
FULL PAPERS
[
20]
tion of the oCNT support. The complete transformation to
the oxycarbide MoO C is indicated by the finished H con-
1) Methanol steam reforming
x
y
2
ꢀ1
CH OH+H O!CO +3H (DH8=49.6 kJmol )
3
2
2
2
sumption and the onset of CH consumption. Finally, step 4 is
4
characterized by the heavy consumption of CH under the for-
2) Methanol reduction
4
mation of CO, CO , and H O, which all decay slowly until the
ꢀ1
2
2
CH OH+H !CH +H O (DH8=ꢀ115.4 kJmol )
3
2
4
2
end of the carburization process after 1 h at 7008C.
Notably, the formation of CO and CO from the blank oCNT
3) Methanol decomposition
CH OH!CO+2H (DH8=90.6 kJmol )
2
sample exceeds temporarily their release from 20MoC/oCNT.
This can be attributed to the strong metal–support interaction
between molybdenum species and the oxygen functionalities
created on the carbon surface to anchor and disperse the
AHM precursor as well as intermediate species. As indicated by
Figure 1, a substantial fraction of oxygen atoms from the
ꢀ1
3
2
4) Reverse water-gas shift
ꢀ1
CO +H !CO+H O (DH8=41.1 kJmol )
2
2
2
5
) CO hydrogenation
x
carbon surface are finally converted to H O.
2
CO +H !alkanes/alkenes+H O
x
2
2
Temperature-programmed desorption (TPD) of CO was per-
formed directly on the freshly carburized catalysts without ex-
position to ambient O and H O. Two main peaks at approxi-
These observations generally agree with previous reports on
[30,31]
supported Mo C catalysts.
However, a detailed comparison
2
2
2
mately 1208C and a shoulder at 2008C are observed (Fig-
ure S1). The comparison with the blank oCNT material confirms
that the CO profile originates exclusively from the interaction
of SRM activity is not possible because of different reaction
conditions used. The metal-free oCNT shows no catalytic activi-
ty under the reaction conditions used.
of CO with the Mo C particles. Yang et al. in their FTIR study of
Three parameters have been selected here to quantify
changes in the catalytic performance of MoC/oCNT catalysts:
the apparent activation energies of CO2 and CH4 formation
and the CO /CH product ratio (Table 1). For 20MoC/oCNT car-
x
CO adsorption on MoN assigned peaks at positions similar to
d+
those of the desorption of CO from Mo (0<d<2) and N
[
24]
sites, respectively. Because of the structurally and catalytical-
ly similar properties between molybdenum carbides and ni-
2
4
ꢀ
1
burized in CH /H at a heating rate of 5 Kmin , the activation
4
2
trides, this assignment is adapted tentatively to Mo C depend-
x
ing on the surface termination by molybdenum or carbon (in-
stead of nitrogen). For b-Mo C(0001), the theory predicts
Table 1. Steam reforming of methanol performance data of MoC/oCNT
catalysts with different loadings carburized at 5 Kmin in CH /H .
4 2
2
ꢀ
1
quite similar stabilities of CO adsorbed on the top positions
[
25]
(
denoted as t1 sites ) on carbon- and molybdenum-terminat-
[a]
Sample
E
a
(CO
2
)
E
a
(CH
4
)
2 4
S(CO )/S(CH )
[
25]
ꢀ
1
ꢀ1
ed surfaces. The total amount of CO desorbed up to 5008C
[kJmol
]
[kJmol ]
ꢀ
1
is 332 mmolg(Mo C) . This value appears rather low; however,
[b]
[b]
[b]
x
oCNT
–
–
–
CO chemisorption on Mo C at ambient temperature measures
5MoC/oCNT
10MoC/oCNT
95ꢁ1
93ꢁ2
91ꢁ1
94ꢁ2
92ꢁ2
111ꢁ1
111ꢁ1
108ꢁ1
108ꢁ2
108ꢁ1
8.4
6.1
4.0
4.1
4.1
x
[26]
only approximately 14% of the total adsorption sites. Thus,
1
2
3
5MoC/oCNT
0MoC/oCNT
0MoC/oCNT
the mean Mo C particle diameter can be estimated as approxi-
x
[
27]
mately 5 nm.
The steam reforming of methanol (SRM) was chosen as
a probe reaction because of a complex selectivity pattern,
which is expected to indicate changes in the catalyst structure.
[
a] 2508C, X(MeOH)=50%; [b] No catalytic activity observed.
[
28]
In the SRM reaction, MeOH reacts to CO or CO, which, in
2
ꢀ
1
the presence of H , reacts further to CH and higher alkanes/al-
energies are 94 and 108 kJmol , respectively, and the product
ratio is 4.1. The CO /CH ratio as a function of MeOH conver-
2
4
kenes through the Fischer–Tropsch synthesis on molybdenum-
2
4
[
29]
based catalysts.
sion (Figure S2b in the Supporting Information) suggests that
both CO and CH are primary products of the reaction; how-
The 20MoC/oCNT catalyst approaches a stable catalytic per-
formance after 2 h time on stream at 2508C and only minor
deactivation is observed in a 24 h test run. The conversion X of
MeOH on this catalyst as a function of contact time is shown
in Figure S2a. The rapid increase in conversion is followed by
a slowdown of the reaction rate after reaching approximately
2
4
ever, secondary methanation of CO also occurs.
2
After SRM tests, the catalyst samples were characterized by
using XRD, N physisorption, and electron microscopy. Because
2
[33]
H O and CO act as mildly oxidizing agents during the SRM,
2
2
no surface passivation by low-concentrated O2 was needed
before exposition to ambient conditions. The XRD analysis con-
firms the pervasive transformation of AHM into face-centered
cubic (fcc) a-MoC (Figure S3a). Although the catalyst has been
used in a catalytic reaction involving potential oxidants such as
H O or CO and even after long-term exposition to ambient
50% conversion. This can be attributed to inhibition by the
main reaction products H and CO as observed on Cu-based
2
2
[
30]
catalysts, although the overall reactant concentration is rela-
tively low. The main carbon-based products of the reaction are
CO and CH , whereas CO, C H , and C H are formed only in
2
4
2
6
2
4
2
2
trace amounts. The following reactions are expected to con-
tribute predominantly to the product pattern observed:
conditions, the XRD patterns show no rise in oxidic bulk
phases. As a reference, the pattern of MoOC is characterized
[34]
by a shift of the fcc pattern to higher angles, which indicates
ꢀ
2013 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
ChemCatChem 2013, 5, 2296 – 2305 2298