J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 7877-7878
In Situ Solid-State NMR Observations of
7877
Photocatalytic Surface Chemistry: Degradation of
Trichloroethylene
Son-Jong Hwang, Chris Petucci, and Daniel Raftery*
Department of Chemistry, Purdue UniVersity
1393 Brown Laboratory of Chemistry
West Lafayette, Indiana 47907
ReceiVed February 6, 1997
ReVised Manuscript ReceiVed May 27, 1997
Environmental catalysts that can efficiently degrade hazardous
chemicals are of growing importance. Among these, TiO2
photocatalysts show high potential for effective degradation of
harmful species, particularly chlorine containing compounds,
which are chemically persistent.1-3 TiO2 photocatalysts can
display efficiencies (degradation rate/unit energy) that are 1-2
orders of magnitude higher than thermal catalysts, particularly
for the low chlorocarbon concentrations often encountered.4 Gas-
surface experiments5-10 show that reactions occur both in the
gas phase and/or on the surface of TiO2 catalysts and can involve
the following radical initiators: O2-, OH, and Cl. Although a
number of studies have been carried out by means of GC,7-9
MS,6,8 and FT-IR,5-8,10 a detailed understanding of the reaction
mechanisms remains elusive. In the present work, we report a
new approach to the study of photocatalysis, namely in situ
solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (SSNMR) spectros-
copy.11-13 SSNMR methods are advantageous because they
allow a quantitative examination of the reactions on the catalyst
surface as well as in the gas phase. We have characterized the
reaction of trichloroethylene (TCE) over two types of TiO2
photocatalysts and have identified new intermediates in the
complex surface chemistry.
Figure 1. Proton-decoupled 13C MAS NMR spectra obtained during
the photocatalytic oxidation of TCE on 170 mg of Degussa P-25 TiO2.
Closed reaction cells were prepared by sealing off 5 mm NMR tubes
after doubly 13C labeled TCE and O2 were introduced onto previously
calcined and evacuated (both at 773 K for 5 hours) TiO2 catalysts.
Approximately 5 mW of near UV light (350-450 nm) is delivered
evenly over the surface of the spinning sample via a liquid light guide
terminated by a 50 mm quartz rod. Spectra were obtained in a Varian
Unity Plus 300 spectrometer operating at 75.4 MHz for 13C and using
a homebuilt in situ MAS probe. (a) Reaction of 48 µmol of TCE with
60 µmol of O2 (48 scans each, delay 4 s). The UV irradiation time is
indicated in minutes. Assignments: TCE (116.7 and 124 ppm with
13C-13C coupling, J ) 103 Hz), DCAC (70 and 167 ppm), C2HCl5
(79.5 and 100 ppm), CO2 (124 ppm), phosgene (144.5 ppm), and CO
(184 ppm). (b) Spectrum (2000 scans, 20 s recycle time) recorded after
Figure 1 shows proton-decoupled 13C magic angle spinning
(MAS) NMR spectra obtained from photooxidation of TCE in
the presence of O2 and Degussa P-25 TiO2 powder.14 The NMR
spectra show the degradation of TCE, the formation of dichlo-
roacetyl chloride (Cl2CHCOCl, DCAC), CO, phosgene (CCl2O),
and pentachloroethane (C2HCl5), and their conversion to the
final product CO2. The narrow line widths of the peaks indicate
that these species are very mobile and most likely exchange
rapidly between the surface and the gas phase. Assignment of
these intermediates are confirmed by comparing 13C NMR shifts
for liquid samples reported in the literature15 or prepared in our
lab and from proton coupled spectra during the photoreactions.
Most of the intermediates identified above are in good agreement
1
UV light was turned off. (c) A spectrum obtained with H-13C cross
polarization. The asterisks indicate spinning sidebands of surface bound
dichloroacetate (center bands: 64 and 177.3 ppm).
(1) Fox, M. A.; Dulay, M. T. Chem. ReV. 1993, 93, 341.
(2) Hoffmann, M. R.; Martin, S. T.; Choi, W.; Bahnemann, D. W. Chem.
ReV. 1995, 95, 69.
(3) Linsebigler, A. L.; Lu, G.; Yates, Jr. J. T. Chem. ReV. 1995, 95, 735.
(4) Miller, R. In Proceedings of the 1st International EPRI/NSF
Symposium on AdVanced Oxidation; EPRI TR-102927-V2, Electric Power
Research Institute: Palo Alto, 1993; p 2.
with previous reports.8,10 There was no indication of the
formation of mono- or dichloroacetaldehyde observed in previ-
ous liquid-phase16 or gas-phase7 reaction studies.
(5) Phillips, L. A.; Raupp, G. B. J. Mol. Catal. 1992, 77, 297.
(6) Nimlos, M. R.; Jacoby, W. A.; Blake, D. M.; Milne, T. A. EnViron.
Sci. Technol. 1993, 27, 732.
A carbon balance obtained from the peak areas of the
aforementioned six species, however, indicates a significant loss
of signal (up to 50%) from the original TCE concentration. A
spectrum acquired using an extended accumulation time (Figure
1b) exhibits additional broad peaks which account for the
apparent loss in signal. The observed line widths result from
adsorption site heterogeneity. A separate spectrum obtained
with cross polarization (CP) is displayed in Figure 1(c) and gives
further proof of the strong adsorption of this species, which we
identify as dichloroacetate (DCAc). DCAc presumably forms
(7) Anderson, M. A.; Yamazaki-Nishida, S.; Cervera-March, S. In
Photocatalytic Purification and Treatment of Water and Air; Ollis, D. F.,
Al-Ekabi, H., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1993; p 405.
(8) Holden, W.; Marcellino, A.; Valic, D.; Weedon, A. C. In Photo-
catalytic Purification and Treatment of Water and Air; Ollis, D. F., Al-
Ekabi, H., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1993; p 393.
(9) Luo, Y.; Ollis, D. F. J. Catal. 1996, 163, 1.
(10) Fan, J.; Yates, Jr. J. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 4686.
(11) Haw, J. F.; Nicholas, J. B.; Xu, T.; Beck, L. W.; Ferguson, D. B.
Acc. Chem. Res. 1996, 29, 259.
(12) Haddix, G. W.; Reimer, J. A.; Bell, A. T. J. Catal. 1987, 106, 111.
(13) Stepanov, A. G. Catal. Today, 1995, 24, 341.
(14) TiO2 P-25 powdered catalyst is a gift from Degussa Corp.
(15) Stadtler, Standard Carbon-13 NMR Spectra; Bio-Rad Laborato-
ries: Philadelphia, PA, 1994.
(16) Pruden, A. L.; Ollis, D. F. J. Catal. 1983, 82, 404.
S0002-7863(97)00399-5 CCC: $14.00 © 1997 American Chemical Society