hydroxyl radicals, e.g.:
OH þ D ! HDO
also play a significant role in the production of gas phase water
observed under the influence of electron beam irradiation.
mally stable well above 103 K, evidenced by its continued pre-
sence after the sample has been warmed to room temperature.
As a result, these species represent an increasing fraction of the
remaining carbon-containing species as the irradiation process
continues. Fig. 7 also shows that the distribution of carbon
containing species after a fixed period of electron beam irradia-
tion time is sensitive to the film’s initial CCl4 : H2O ratio. This
is a reflection of the fact that in concentrated CCl4 films elec-
tron stimulated reactions lead predominantly to the formation
of a CClx overlayer. In dilute CCl4 films, however, this path-
way becomes less important.
ð17Þ
Hydrogen and oxygen production. The yield of hydrogen and
oxygen are both attenuated in films concentrated with CCl4
(Figs. 4 and 5). The production of hydrogen during electron
beam irradiation of ice has been ascribed to a variety of differ-
ent reactions, including fast proton transfer:21
H
ꢀ þ H2O ! H2 þ ꢀ OH
ð18Þ
and bimolecular recombination:11
Conclusions
H þ H ! H2
ð19Þ
In films concentrated with CCl4 the electron stimulated reac-
tions of carbon tetrachloride in water (ice) films are dominated
by carbon–carbon coupling reactions leading to the formation
of a thermally stable partially chlorinated carbonaceous over-
layer (CClx) and C2Cl4 . Under these conditions carbon mon-
oxide is the dominant volatile carbon-containing species
produced while chlorine is lost predominantly into the gas
phase. As the initial CCl4 : H2O ratio in the film decreases,
the production of CO2 becomes increasingly important at the
expense of the CClx overlayer and C2Cl4 . In these water rich
films chlorine is partitioned as HCl in the film, producing
H3O+ and Clꢀ. The distribution of gas phase hydrogen and
oxygen produced from electron stimulated reactions of H2O
are also influenced by CCl4 with the production of oxygen
being effectively quenched in films concentrated with CCl4 .
Support for these mechanisms is provided by the observation
of mass 4 (D2), 3 (HD) and 2 (H2) during electron stimulated
reactions in CCl4/D2O/H2O films (Fig. 4(f)). In concentrated
CCl4 films, the nascent probability of these reactions will be
reduced. Furthermore, a large fraction of the water will be
consumed by dichlorocarbene hydrolysis (reaction (5)). Both
of these factors are expected to contribute to the decrease in
H2 produced in CCl4 rich films. Although the detailed elemen-
tary reaction steps responsible for molecular oxygen produc-
tion during electron stimulated reactions of ice are not
known,25 it can be reasonably assumed to involve a multi-body
collision event involving oxygen containing species whose
probability will also decrease in more CCl4 rich films.
Fig. 5(c) also shows that the oxygen/hydrogen (O2 : H2)
ratio decreases sharply as a function of increasing CCl4 con-
centration in the film. Thus, for all films with an initial CCl4
: H2O ratio >ꢄ0.1, the production of oxygen is effectively
quenched. This suggests that O2 production is more signifi-
cantly attenuated in the presence of CCl4 . This is postulated
to arise in part from the additional consumption of oxygen
by reactions in the film involving carbon-containing free radi-
cals, most notably:
Acknowledgements
Support for this research was provided by the National Science
Foundation (# CHE-0089168) as part of the Collaborative
Research Activities in Environmental Molecular Science in
Environmental Redox-Mediated Dehalogenation Chemistry
at the Johns Hopkins University.
ꢁCCl3 þ O2 !! OCCl2
ð20Þ
An alternative explanation for the continued production of H2
even in films concentrated with CCl4 is based on the greater
mobility anticipated for hydrogen species (H or Hꢀ) responsi-
ble for H2 production (eqns. (18) and (19)). Irrespective of the
detailed mechanistic explanation, results from the present
investigation suggest that hydrogen production from water
(ice) under the influence of electron beam irradiation is an
important process even in the presence of co-adsorbates, while
O2 production is more likely to be quenched.
References
1
R. L. Clough, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B, 2001,
185, 8.
2
3
4
H. D. Ebinger and J. J. T. Yates, Surf. Sci., 1998, 412/413, 1.
L. Sanche, IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul., 1997, 4, 507.
B. Boudaiffa, P. Cloutier, D. Hunting, M. A. Huels and L.
Sanche, Science, 2000, 287, 1658.
5
6
7
8
T. I. Balkas, Int. J. Radiat. Phys. Chem., 1972, 4, 199.
G. J. Schulz, Rev. Mod. Phys., 1973, 45, 423.
M. Jungen, J. Vogt and V. Staemmler, Chem. Phys., 1979, 37, 49.
R. Azria, Y. L. Coat, G. Lefevre and D. Simon, J. Phys. B, 1979,
14, 175.
Time dependence. The observed product intensities in both
IR and mass spectral analysis are also sensitive to electron
beam exposure, increasing at short irradiation times before
decreasing upon prolonged periods of irradiation as the film
is depleted of material.36 The product partitioning, however,
is much more sensitive to changes in the film’s initial chemical
composition. For example, Fig. 5 illustrates that only small
changes were observed in the CO : CO2 gas phase ratio during
electron beam irradiation, although this same ratio is strongly
influenced by changes in the film’s initial chemical composi-
tion. This result is qualitatively consistent with IR measure-
ments (not shown) indicating that the average CCl4 : H2O
composition in the film does not change significantly during
electron beam irradiation.
9
N. J. Sack and T. E. Madey, Surf. Sci., 1996, 347, 367.
10 R. L. Hudson and M. H. Moore, Icarus, 1997, 126, 223.
11 R. L. Hudson and M. H. Moore, Icarus, 1999, 140, 451.
12 R. E. Johnson, Rev. Mod. Phys., 1996, 68, 305.
13 R. L. Hudson and M. H. Moore, J. Geophys. Res., Planets, 2001,
106, 33 275.
14 J. F. Cooper, R. E. Johnson, B. H. Mauk, H. B. Garrett and
N. Gehrels, Icarus, 2001, 149, 133.
15 Q.-B. Lu and T. E. Madey, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2001, 105, 2779.
16 Q.-B. Lu and T. E. Madey, Surf. Sci., 2000, 451, 238.
17 Q.-B. Lu and T. E. Madey, J. Chem. Phys., 1999, 111, 2861.
18 J. O. Noell, C. F. Melius and R. H. Stulen, Surf. Sci., 1985, 115,
119.
19 W. C. Simpson, L. Parentaeu, R. S. Smith, L. Sanche and T. M.
Orlando, Surf. Sci., 1997, 390, 86.
20 F. T. Mak, S. R. Zele, W. J. Cooper, C. N. Kurucz, T. D. Waite
and M. G. Nickelsen, Wat. Res., 1997, 31, 219.
21 G. A. Kimmel, T. M. Orlando, C. Vezina and L. Sanche, J. Chem.
Phys., 1994, 101, 3282.
Although the product distribution is not significantly influ-
enced by irradiation time, Fig. 6 shows that the fraction of car-
bon-containing species in the CClx carbonaceous film increases
during electron beam irradiation. This can be ascribed to the
fact that unlike CO or CO2 species, the CClx overlayer is ther-
3812
Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2002, 4, 3806–3813