Communication
RSC Advances
became more intense when TiO
2
was irradiated with UV (light secondary reactions while we used on-line reaction system with
D). The MF-adsorbed TiO (TiO -MF) does not show any EPR high input rates of reactants to minimize the secondary reac-
2
2
signal in the dark except the original weak Ti(III) signal (Fig. 5C). tions of the primary products by rapidly sweeping the primary
+
However, a weak h signal and a strong Ti(III) signal appeared products away from the catalyst. The production of H and CO2
2
upon irradiation of TiO
that the electron transfer from MF to h took place. PdO/TiO
2
-MF with light B (Fig. 5D), indicating without CH
4
indicates that the reaction system of Solymosi's
group contains a signicant amount of moisture. In such a case
did not give additional ESR signals due to h and Ti(III) in the MF will primarily undergo hydrolysis to CH OH and HCO H,
dark (Fig. 5E). Upon irradiation with light B, it gave a weak and which subsequently undergo photocatalytic decomposition into
+
2
+
3
2
24
broad signal at g ¼ 2.1 due to Pd(I), together with the signals CO
2
2
and H . The presence of CO also indicates that CO elimi-
+
due to h and Ti(III) (Fig. 5F). In the presence of MF, either in the nation to CH OH and CO also took place.
3
dark (Fig. 5G) or under light B (Fig. 5H), PdO/TiO2 gave a
In summary, we have demonstrated the photocatalyic
homolysis of dry MF vapour into dry CH O vapour in high
+
+
stronger Pd(I) signal and no h signal, indicating that the h
scavenging by MF took place, giving rise to the formation of selectivity (>80%). PdO/TiO
Pd(I) species and Ti(III). Coupled with the broad UV-vis spectrum CH O in high selectivity with an inert gas or more preferentially
due to Pd nanoparticles, we conclude that MF converts PdO into with dry air as the carrier gas. The UV-free solar simulated light
Pd(I)/Pd(0) nanoparticles and TiO into the electron rich Ti(III)- is best to produce dry CH O in high selectivity and in high yield.
trapping TiO . We conclude that this is the active catalyst which
2
2
is the best catalyst to produce dry
2
2
2
2
carries out the photocatalytic conversion of MF to two CH O.
2
Acknowledgements
Although a detailed study is necessary to elucidate the
precise mechanism, we tentatively propose the reaction mech-
anism as follows. Thus, MF undergoes an oxidative addition by
cleaving the C–O bond to the electron rich Pd(I)Pd(0) nano-
This work was supported by the Korea Center for Articial
Photosynthesis, funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT and
Future Planning through the National Research Foundation of
Korea, no. 2009-0093886 and no. 2012R1A2A3A01009806. We
thank J. Y. Lee for the help in preparing the manuscript and
drawing gures. We also thank KBSI (Korea Basic Science
Institute) at Ewha Womans University for ESR measurements.
2
particles which are also supported on electron rich TiO (Fig. 6,
step A). The hydrogen atom transfer from the Pd-bound
methoxy group to the Pd-bound formyl group and the reduc-
tive elimination of two CH O takes place to give two CH O
2
2
molecules (Fig. 6, step B). For this reaction we propose that the
formation of electron rich Pd nanoparticles and TiO is the key
2
to this photocatalytic reaction. The activation of the surface
plasmon of the Pd nanoparticles by photons as well as the
Notes and references
maintenance of the electron rich Pd and TiO
essential for the oxidative addition and reductive elimination
reactions.
2
seems to be
1 S. H. Lee, J. Chem. Phys., 2008, 129, 194304.
2 T. J. Wallington, M. D. Hurley, T. Maurer, I. Barnes,
K. H. Becker, G. S. Tyndall, J. J. Orlando, A. S. Pimentel
and M. Bilde, J. Phys. Chem. A, 2001, 105, 5146–5154.
3 S. Dooley, F. L. Dryer, B. Yang, J. Wang, T. A. Cool, T. Kasper
and N. Hansen, Combust. Flame, 2011, 158, 732–741.
4 E. M. Fisher, W. J. Pitz, H. J. Currane and C. K. Westbrook,
Proc. Combust. Inst., 2000, 28, 1579–1586.
In the presence of H O, signicant amounts of CH OH, CO ,
2
3
2
and H were formed while the produced amount of CO is very
2
small. In this case, we conclude that CH OH was not produced
3
from the heterolysis of MF (CO elimination process) but from
the photocatalytic hydrolysis of MF yielding CH
HCO H, which decomposes into CO and H according to the
recent report.
Solymosi and the coworkers recently reported that CO
3
OH and
2
2
2
5 S. Dooley, M. P. Burke, M. Chaos, Y. Stein, F. L. Dryer,
V. P. Zhukov, O. Finch, J. M. Simmie and H. J. Currane,
Int. J. Chem. Kinet., 2010, 42, 527–549.
25
2
, CO
and H2 are the major products during the photocatalytic
6 W. K. Metcalfe, J. M. Simmie and H. J. Curran, J. Phys. Chem.
A, 2010, 114, 5478–5484.
7 B. W. Higdon Gray, C. C. Hobbs and M. J. Onore, US Pat.,
3,812,210, 1971.
decomposition of MF on M/TiO (M ¼ Pt, Pd, Rh, Ir, and Ru) by
2
irradiating the catalyst with a UV light with the spectral width
15
between 250–440 nm with the maximum intensity at 254 nm.
As noted, this result is quite different from ours. We think the
difference arises from the fact that Solymosi's group adopted
the circulation system in which the primary products undergo
8 F. R. Vega, J. C. Cl ´e ment and H. D. Abbayes, Tetrahedron Lett.,
1993, 34, 8117–8118.
9 J. S. Francisco, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 10475–10480.
1
1
0 F. Q. Ma, D. S. Lu and Z. Y. Guo, J. Catal., 1992, 134, 644–653.
1 F. Q. Ma, D. S. Lu and Z. Y. Guo, J. Mol. Catal., 1993, 78, 309–
3
25.
2 M. H. Chao, P. Y. Tsai and K. C. Lin, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.,
011, 13, 7154–7161.
3 G. Cui, F. Zhang and W. Fang, J. Chem. Phys., 2010, 132,
34306.
1
1
1
2
0
4 C. C. Chuang, W. C. Wu, M. C. Huang, I. C. Huang and
Fig. 6 Schematic illustration of the proposed mechanism.
J. L. Lin, J. Catal., 1999, 185, 423–434.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014
RSC Adv., 2014, 4, 33144–33148 | 33147