768
J.-B. Raoof et al. / Journal of Molecular Liquids 212 (2015) 767–774
metal [19]. Our literature survey indicates that the fabrication of the Pt-
NP modified GCE (Pt-NP/MGCE) by using Ni nanoparticles (Ni-NPs) as
sacrificial templates has not been reported. Hence, in the present in-
vestigation, at first the Ni-NP electrodepositing was performed onto
the GCE surface and Pt-NPs were then prepared by GRR and their ef-
ficiency towards the electrocatalytic oxidation of methanol was in-
vestigated. The experimental data reveal that the Pt-NP/MGCE
showed excellent performance in the methanol oxidation and formal-
dehyde oxidation.
the surface into the electrolyte solution. Also, in the meantime, PtIV is re-
duced and deposited on the electrode surface. It should be noted that
during the GRR, Ni-NPs are dissolved into the solution via a reaction be-
+
tween Ni-NPs with H as a competitive reaction (4):
2−
0
2þ
−
2
NiðsÞ þ PtCl6 ðaqÞ→Pt þ 2Ni
þ 6Cl
ð3Þ
ð4Þ
ðsÞ
ðaqÞ
ðaqÞ
þ
2þ
Ni þ 2H →Ni
ðsÞ
þ H ðgÞ:
2
ðaqÞ
ðaqÞ
It is obvious that the displacing metal in comparison with sacrificial
metal manifests oxidation state (4:2). So, according to stoichiometry of
the redox reaction, during the reaction by deposition of a Pt atom at the
electrode surface, two Ni atoms leach in the surrounding aqueous envi-
ronment. Hence, on the basis of both reactions (3 and 4), all deposited
Ni-NPs release from the electrode surface. Afterwards, when the
2
. Experimental
2
.1. Reagents and materials
NiSO
4
·6H
2
O (99%, Fluka) was used in the preparation of Ni depo-
PtCl ·6H O (Merck) and NaOH (99%, Merck) were
sition solution. H
2
6
2
Pt-NP/MGCE was prepared, it was removed and rinsed with distilled
used as received. Methanol and formaldehyde from Merck were of
analytical grade. Sulfuric acid (98%, Fluka) was used for the prepara-
tion of the supporting electrolyte. K Fe(CN) , K Fe(CN) (99%, Fluka)
3 6 4 6
and KCl (99%, Merck) were used for impedance studies. The solvent
used in this work for preparation of the samples was double distilled
water.
2
water. The geometric surface area (A
g
= 0.018 cm ) was used to calcu-
late the current density, except for the comparison of the methanol ox-
idation and formaldehyde oxidation. All experiments were performed
at ambient temperature.
3. Results and discussion
2
.2. Electrochemical measurements
3.1. Electrochemical properties of the modified electrodes
The electrochemical experiments were carried out by using a
In order to ascertain the electrochemical response of the prepared
potentiostat/galvanostat (SAMA 500-C Electrochemical analysis
system, Sama, Iran) coupled with a personal computer (PC). Elec-
trochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was performed by an
Autolab model PGSTAT 30 with FRA software version 4.9 (Eco
Chemie, The Netherlands). The three-electrode system consists of
the GCE (1.5 mm in diameter) as working electrode substrate,
Ag│AgCl│KCl (3 M) as reference electrode and a Pt wire as an auxiliary
electrode. The surface morphology and elemental analysis of the de-
posits were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, model
VEGA-Tescan, Razi Metallurgical Research Center, Tehran, Iran)
equipped with an energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS).
modified electrode, after accomplishing Ni-NP electrodeposition, the
Ni-NP/MGCE was thoroughly rinsed with distilled water and 15 poten-
tial cycles were conducted between 0.2 and 0.8 V in 0.1 M NaOH
solution until stable cyclic voltammogram was obtained (Fig. 1A
2
.3. Preparation of the Ni nanoparticles
Prior to surface modification, the GCE was carefully polished with
polishing cloth and alumina slurry until a mirror finish was obtained.
To remove the alumina residues that might be trapped at the surface,
the polished electrode was placed in ethanol and sonicated for 5 min.
Then, the electrode was rinsed thoroughly with distilled water. After
that, Ni-NPs were electrodeposited potentiostatically at −1.0 V vs.
Ag│AgCl│KCl (3 M) for 500 s in 0.5 M H
2 4
SO solution containing
0
.5 M NiSO according to reaction (1). Also, associated with deposition
4
of Ni-NPs, hydrogen bubbles were released via hydrogen evolution re-
action as a competitive reaction according to reaction (2).
2
þ
þ 2e−→NiðsÞ
þ 2e−→H2ðgÞ:
Ni
ð1Þ
ð2Þ
ðaqÞ
þ
2
H
ðaqÞ
2
.4. Preparation of the Pt-NP/MGCE
After Ni-NP electrodeposition, the electrode was immediately im-
mersed in 0.5 M H SO solution containing 5.0 mM H PtCl for 20 min
to let GRR between Ni and Pt ions proceeds. Since, the standard re-
2
4
0
2
6
IV
IV
0
duction potential of the Pt /Pt pair (+0.73 V vs. SHE) is higher than
Fig. 1. (A) 15th CV signal of the Ni-NP/MGCE in 0.1 M NaOH (solid line) and 0.5 M H
2
SO
SO
4
the Ni2+/Ni pair (−0.25 V vs. SHE), Ni-NPs can be oxidized by PtCl
0
2−
−1
6
solution (dotted line) at υ = 50 mV s . (B) CV signal of the Pt-NP/MGCE in 0.5 M H
2
4
solution at υ = 50 mV s−
1
.
according to following replacement reaction (3) and removed from