J. Dang et al. / Journal of Alloys and Compounds 745 (2018) 421e429
425
This difference in expected reaction sequence is also illustrated
by Fig. 3, which shows the equilibrium reaction products for reac-
tion of WO and CO in different molar ratios. In Fig. 3, the partial
pressure of CO - balance is CO - is shown in the upper graphs; the
4. Results and discussion
2
4.1. Non-isothermal reaction
2
relative molar amounts of solid phases are shown in the lower
graphs. Fig. 3 confirms the difference in expected reaction
sequence: simultaneous reduction and carburization [reaction (1)]
at the lower temperature, and reduction to W, followed by carbu-
To clarify the onset temperature of reduction and the effect of
ramping rates on the reaction, non-isothermal reduction of WO
powders was performed by using pure carbon monoxide at three
2
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
different ramping rates, 4 C/min, 6 C/min and 8 C/min. The ob-
tained results are shown as Fig. 4. Fig. 4a shows the temperature
dependences of the weight changes during non-isothermal reac-
tion, which demonstrates that different ramping rates have a sig-
nificant effect on the reduction rate and the reaction route. It is
rization to W
2
C at the higher temperature [reaction (2)]. However,
ꢀ
it should be noted that the final product is W
2
C at 1179 C even the
in
in
ratio of nCO/nWO2 is as much as 40 or even higher. Fig. 3 also il-
lustrates that the CO partial pressure required to yield W C as
stable product is much lower at the higher temperature.
2
2
ꢀ
shown that the reaction became apparent at around 730 C
These predicted reaction sequences were tested experimentally
by measuring the phases in partially reduced materials, and by
monitoring the mass loss during reaction (thermogravimetry). The
difference in mass loss for the different reaction sequences was
readily detectable: completion of reaction (1) (reduction and
carburization, forming WC) would give a reduction in mass of the
(1003 K), and a higher heating rate led to a faster reaction (Fig. 4b).
Based on the weight change, the reaction is divided into two steps,
loss-mass reaction and gain-mass reaction. All the three curves first
go over ꢂ9.27% (corresponding to forming WC) but do not
reach ꢂ12.05% (corresponding to forming W
to ꢂ9.27%. It suggests that only part of WO
carbonized to W C and then to WC, which is confirmed by XRD
analysis (listed in Table 2). This is because at low temperature, WC
is formed directly, but with increasing the temperature, W C will be
2
C), and then go back
2
was first reduced and
solid of 9.27% (relative to the original mass of WO
2
) and completion
2
of reaction (1a) to form W C would give a mass loss of 12.05%,
2
whereas completion of reaction (2a) (reduction to W) would give a
mass loss of 14.83%.
2
ꢀ
formed first. With increasing the ramping rate from 4 C/min to
ꢀ
6
C/min, the amount of formed W
2
C increases dramatically,
C forming temperature;
resulting from the rapid approaching W
while increasing the ramping rate to 8 C/min, the amount of W
2
ꢀ
2
C
drops off, which may be caused by reacting formed W
immediately at high temperature.
2
C to WC
The maximum rate for the first reaction (loss-mass reaction)
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
appeared at 840 C (1113 K), 945 C (1218 K), and 973 C (1246 K) at
ꢀ
ꢀ
ꢀ
the heating rate of 4 C/min, 6 C/min and 8 C/min (Fig. 4b),
respectively. The slow reaction rates at low temperatures and high
temperatures are due to the relatively small reduction rate constant
and the exhaustion of samples, respectively. The highest reduction
rate has occurred at the temperature when both reduction rate
constant and oxide concentration were at the high levels.
4.2. Isothermal reaction
Isothermal reduction of WO
2
by pure CO was studied in the
ꢀ
ꢀ
temperature range of 813 C (1086 K) to 1179 C (1452 K). Fig. 5
shows the time dependences of the weight changes during
isothermal reduction at eight different temperatures. The figure
ꢀ
shows that at lower temperatures [below 861 C (1134 K)], the mass
loss increased smoothly to 9.27% (corresponding to the weight
ꢀ
change from WO
(
2
to WC); at moderate temperatures [884 C
ꢀ
1157 K) to 908 C (1181 K)], the weight loss ratio first increased
over 9.27% but not up to 12.05% (corresponding to the weight
change from WO
2
to W
2
C), and finally decreased to 9.27%; at
ꢀ
ꢀ
1009 C (1282 K) and 1102 C (1375 K), the weight loss ratio first
increased up to 14.83% (corresponding to the weight change from
WO to W) and then decreased to about 9.27%; however, the weight
loss ratio first increased up to 14.83% and then decreased very slow
2
ꢀ
ꢀ
when the reaction proceeded at 1150 C (1423 K) and 1179 C
1452 K). This reaction behavior is consistent with the expected
(
reaction sequence, as discussed earlier: at lower temperatures,
simultaneous reduction and carburization to form WC directly from
WO
tion and carburization in WO
rization of to form WC are expected; while at high
temperature, reduction of WO to W and then carburization of W to
WC are expected; at even higher temperatures, W C as the most
2
is expected; at the moderate temperatures, two-step reduc-
2
to W C, followed by further carbu-
2
2
W C
2
2
stable phase is expected, however, the carburization proceeds very
slow.
2
Fig. 4. Non-isothermal reduction of WO with pure CO: (a) weight change verse
temperature, (b) DTG verse temperature.
ꢀ
XRD analyses for completely reduced samples at 813 C