Y. Yang, et al.
JournalofFluorineChemistry237(2020)109600
Fig. 1. SEM images of Zn(OH)F materials obtained at 100 ℃ with different hydrothermal time: (a) 0 h, (b) 10 min, (c) 0.5 h, (d) 1 h, (e) 2 h, (f) 6 h.
hydrothermal temperature, calcination temperature, Zn sources, sol-
vent, alkali source and surfactants were considered in the process of
synthesis.
2.2. Characterization of Zn(OH)F samples
X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the samples were obtained on a
Bruker D8 Advance X-ray diffract meter with Cu Kα radiation (λ
=1.5406 Å). UV–vis diffuse reflection spectra (UV–vis DRS) were re-
corded using a Hitachi UV-365 spectrophotometer with BaSO4 as re-
ference. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of the samples
were obtained by a field emission SEM (FESEM, FEI Nova NANOSEM
230). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and high-resolution
transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) images were performed on
a JEM-ARM200 F electron microscope operated at an acceleration
voltage of 200 kV. N2 physisorption measurements were carried out at
77 K using a Micromeritics Tristar II 3020 surface area analyzer.
Multipoint Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) specific surface areas were
then determined from the adsorption isotherms.
2. Experimental section
2.1. Preparation of Zn(OH)F samples with different morphology
All chemicals in this work were of analytical grade and purchased
from Sinopharm company, which were used without further purifica-
tion. Deionized water was used throughout this study. Zn(OH)F with
different synthetic conditions are described as following:
The synthesis of barklike Zn(OH)F: 0.661 g Zn(NO3)2∙6H2O, 0.822 g
NH4F were firstly dissolved into 82 mL H2O, and the pH value was
adjusted by NaOH (when NaOH amount is 0.176 g, PH = 7). After
continuous stirring for 2 h, the solution was transferred into a Teflon-
lined stainless steel autoclave with 100 mL capacity. The autoclave was
sealed and maintained at 100 ℃ for 6 h, and then cooling down natu-
rally. The obtained products were collected by centrifugation and wa-
shed with deionized water and ethanol for several times, and dried at
60 °C for 8 h.
2.3. Photocatalytic activity of Zn(OH)F samples
The liquid-phase photocatalytic activities of Zn(OH)F samples were
mainly evaluated by the degradation of organic pollutants under UV
light. A cylindrical glass vessel as the reactor was surrounded by four
UV lamps (Philips, TUV 4 W/G4 T5), and the wavelength centered at
254 nm. 100 mg catalyst was added into the vessel which contained
150 mL organic pollutants. The initial concentration of salicylic acid
(SA), rhodamine B (RhB), Methylene blue (MB) and phenol were 1.0 ×
The influence of calcination temperature: the above obtained Zn
(OH)F was calcinated at 200 ℃, 250 ℃, 300 ℃ and 400 ℃ with 1 ℃
min–1, respectively.
The influence of Zn sources, solvent, alkali sources and surfactants
are investigated, and other condition is similar with the above synthesis
of barklike Zn(OH)F without calcination. These differences are shown
in the following: (1) different zinc sources are added to replace Zn
(NO3)2∙6H2O, and the corresponding mass are 0.310 g, 0.639 g, 0.488 g
and 0.590 g for ZnCl2, ZnSO4∙7H2O, zinc acetate (Zn(Ac)2) and zinc
acetylacetone (Zn(Ah)2), respectively. (2) The methanol and H2O as the
solvent is added, and the volume are 20 mL and 62 mL, respectively. (3)
Different alkali source (3-butylamine, oleylamine and ethylenediami-
netetraacetic acid disodium salt (EDTA-2Na)) is added to replace
NaOH, and the amount is 0.176 g. (4) The surfactants are added after
the dissolution of Zn(NO3)2∙6H2O and 0.83 g NH4F in water, and their
mass for P123, cetyl brominated ammonium (CTAB), sodium dodecyl
benzene sulfonate (DBS), D-glucose (D-Glu), polyethylene pyrrole
(PVP) and sodium dodecylsulphonate (SDS) are 2 g, 1 g, 0.5 g, 1 g, 0.5 g
and 1 g, respectively.
10−4 mol L–1, 1.0 × 10-5 mol L–1, 10 ppm and 1.0 × 10–4 mol L–1
,
respectively. Prior to irradiation, the suspension was stirred con-
tinuously in the dark for 30 min to ensure the establishment of the
adsorption/desorption equilibrium. After specific time intervals of ir-
radiation, a 3-mL suspension was withdrawn and then centrifuged to
remove the catalyst during the photocatalytic degradation progress. A
Varian Cary 50 Scan UV–vis spectrophotometer was used to record the
concentration changes of the resulting degraded solution. The de-
gradation rate was marked as C/C0. C was the maximum absorption
intensity of degraded solution (SA, RhB, MB and phenol) for each ir-
radiated time interval at 297 nm, 554 nm, 664 nm and 269 nm, and C0
was the absorption intensity of the initial concentration when adsorp-
tion/desorption equilibrium was achieved.
2