hydrogen at low temperature, which is of high potential for
transportable, especially portable, hydrogen sources. The
breakthrough of the advanced catalysts in preventing CO
poisoning is a valuable contribution for advancement of
oxidation and between CO content and the corresponding
proportion of electro-oxidation of small organic molecules.16
The authors are grateful for the financial sponsors of State
Key Fundamental Research Program of China, (973 Program,
G2000026408), State Key High Technology Research
Program of China (863 Program, 2001AA323060,
2003AA517062, 2006AA05Z137), Nature Science Foundation
of China (20373068, 20433060). The authors are also grateful
for the help of Dongmei Wang, Liaohai Ge, Xinglin Li,
Guangfu, Zeng, Zhen Zhang, Xiangguang Yang, Fei Li and
Debashis Panda.
Fig. 4 The output volume of reforming gas at 365 K with 5.00 ml
9.94 M formic acid–3.33 M sodium formate solution. (Solid line) 60
mg PdAu/C–CeO2 10 wt% Pd, 50% CeO2, nPd : nAu = 1 : 1; (dashed
line) 60 mg PdAg/C–CeO2 10 wt% Pd, 50% CeO2, nPd : nAg = 1 : 1;
(dotted line) 30 mg PdAg/C 20 wt% Pd, nPd : nAg = 1 : 1.
Notes and references
z CAUTION: formic acid is harmful to skin or eyes and thus it is
important to prevent the leakage of formic acid during the experiments
and applications.
process during decomposition of small organic molecules has
been removed effectively by the Pd alloyed catalysts with
Au or Ag.
1. P. Seungdoo, M. V. John and J. G. Raymond, Nature, 2000, 404,
265.
2. P. Costamagna and S. Srinivasan, J. Power Sources, 2001, 102,
242.
In addition, the activities of Pd–Au/C and Pd–Ag/C here
can be enhanced enormously by co-deposition with CeO2-
(H2O)x (simply written as CeO2) as shown in Fig. 4. It can be
seen that the activities of 60 mg Pd–Me/C–CeO2 (10 wt% Pd,
50 wt% CeO2, Me = Au and Ag, nPd : nMe = 3 : 3) reach 1640
3. L. Schlapbach and A. Zuttel, Nature, 2001, 414, 353.
¨
4. J. Chen, N. Kuriyama, Q. Xu, H. T. Takeshita and T. Sakai,
J. Phys. Chem. B, 2001, 105, 11214.
5. D. Sun, S. S. Srinivasan, T. Kiyobayashi, N. Kuriyama and
C. M. Jensen, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2003, 107, 10176.
6. W. C. Shin and R. S. Besser, J. Power Sources, 2007, 164, 328.
7. G. A. Deluga, J. R. Salge, L. D. Schmidt and X. E. Verykios,
Science, 2004, 303, 993.
8. D. L. Hoang, S. H. Chan and O. L. Ding, J. Power Sources, 2006,
159, 1248.
9. E. Antolini, J. R. C. Salgado and E. R. Gonzalez, J. Electroanal.
Chem., 2005, 580, 145.
and 548 ml minꢀ1 ꢀ1, or 10.3 and 3.4 times that of 30 mg
g
Pd–Ag/C (20 wt% Pd, nPd : nAg=3 : 3), respectively. The
TONs of Pd–Au/C–CeO2 and Pd–Ag/C–CeO2 are 227 and 76
ꢀ1, respectively. With increasing the working temperature by
h
10 degrees, the reaction rate for Pd–Au/C–CeO2 became
extremely fast (46000 ml minꢀ1 ꢀ1, TON up to 832 hꢀ1),
g
which shows high potential in transportable application. Fig.
S8 (ESIw) shows the TEM of Pd–Ag/C–CeO2 and Pd–Au/
C–CeO2 catalysts. Looking at Fig. S2, the dispersion of
nanoparticles of Pd–Ag is improved by adding CeO2, while
it becomes poor for Pd–Au. This result implies that a higher
dispersion is not the key fact for the improvement of activity.
The promotion of CeO2 on the activity of Pd-based catalysts is
probably due to that the CeO2 produces cationic palladium
species, which show high activity in CO oxidation23 and
methanol decomposition.24 Another reason is due to that
CeO2(H2O)x on the Pd surface can induce the decomposition
of formic acid by a more efficient route, in which fewer
poisoning intermediates will be produced. Because of the
lowest adsorption strength of CO on Au surfaces, Au is most
effective to reduce the adsorption of CO on Pd surface.18 This
effect is further strengthened by the addition of CeO2. Pd–Au/
C–CeO2 thereby become much more active than Pd–Ag/
C–CeO2.
The yield of 1640 ml minꢀ1 gꢀ1 reforming gas indicates a
theoretical power density of 135 W gꢀ1 for PEMFC, which can
being further improved by increasing activity and decreasing
the working temperature by optimising the catalyst composi-
tion and working conditions. The main contribution of the
work is to inhibit the CO poisoning, and consequently provide
a new route to rapidly and conveniently evolve high quality
10. C. Rice, S. Ha, R. I. Masel and A. Wieckowski, J. Power Sources,
2003, 115, 229.
11. L. Colmenares, H. Wang, Z. Jusys, L. Jiang, S. Yan, G. Q. Sun
and R. J. Behm, Electrochim. Acta, 2006, 52, 221.
12. N. Akiya and P. E. Savage, AIChE J., 1998, 44, 405.
13. D. M. Ruthven and R. S. Upadhye, J. Catal., 1971, 21, 39.
14. S. P. Hill and J. M. Winterbottom, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol.,
1988, 41, 121.
15. (a) Y. Gao, J. Kuncheria, G. P. A. Yap and R. J. Puddephatt,
Chem. Commun., 1998, 2365; (b) R. S. Coffey, Chem. Commun.,
1967, 18, 923a; (c) J. R. Hyde and M. Poliakoff, Chem. Commun.,
2004, 1482; (d) K. Abdur-Rashid, S. E. Clapham, A. Hadzovic,
J. N. Harvey, A. J. Lough and R. H. Morris, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2002, 124, 15104.
16. T. J. Schmidt, Z. Jusys, H. A. Gasteiger, R. J. Behm,
U. Endruschat and H. Boennemann, J. Electroanal. Chem.,
2001, 501, 132.
17. F. S. Thomas and R. I. Masel, Surf. Sci., 2004, 573, 169.
18. F. Abild-Pedersen and M. P. Andersson, Surf. Sci., 2007, 601,
1747.
19. C. Xu and D. W. Goodman, J. Phys. Chem., 1996, 100, 245.
20. K. Judai, S. Abbet, A. S. Worz, U. Heiz, L. Giordano and
¨
G. Pacchioni, J. Phys. Chem. B., 2003, 107, 9377.
21. V. Joha
15.
22. S. Karski, I. Witon
Catal. A: Chem., 2005, 240, 155.
nek, N. Tsud, V. Matolın and I. Stara, Vacuum, 2001, 63,
´ ´ ´
´
ska, J. Rogowski and J. Go"uchowska, J. Mol.
23. G. Glaspell, L. Fuoco and M. S. El-Shall, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2005,
109, 17350.
24. W.-J. Shen and Y. Matsumura, J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem., 2000,
153, 165.
ꢁc
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2008
3542 | Chem. Commun., 2008, 3540–3542