H. Nemoto et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 42 (2001) 2145–2147
2147
6. The conditions we first examined were referred from our
previous publications. (a) Nemoto, H.; Kubota, Y.;
Yamamoto, Y. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1994,
1665–1666. (b) Nemoto, H.; Ma, R.; Ibaragi, T.; Suzuki,
I.; Shibuya, M. Tetrahedron 2000, 41, 1463–1468.
7. The reaction rates of both MAC anion and cyanide anion
to 2Z could be strongly affected by the polarity of
solvents. In fact, we observed that the aldehyde 2Z was
consumed within a short period in acetonitrile as well as
in methanol. In hexane or toluene as a representative
non-polar solvent, more than 10 hours were required to
finish the reaction. However, the ratio of the desired
compound 9a to the cyanohydrin 13 was independent
from the polarity of solvent. We chose ether since the
ratio in ether was higher than the ratios in other solvents.
8. According to the following publications, the major iso-
mer 9a is the product by non-chelation control. (a)
Herrantz, R.; Castro-Pichel, J.; Vinuesa, S.; Garcia-
Lopez, M. T. J. Org. Chem. 1990, 55, 2232–2234. (b)
Reetz, M. T.; Drewes, M. W.; Harms, K.; Reif, W.
Tetrahedron Lett. 1988, 29, 3295–3598.
instead of pyridine, the yield was slightly increased
(entry 2). Since the cyanohydrin DL-13 was obtained in
briefly 50–60% yield as a major byproduct in entries 1
and 2, we considered that the formation of 13 could be
inhibited in less polar solvent than in methanol. There-
fore, we used ether7 as a solvent with 3 equivalents of
methanol with various bases. Using 4-pyrrolidinopy-
ridine (PPY) gave the best result (entry 6) of all the four
examinations (entries 3, 4, 5, and 6). Next, we carried
out the reactions with PPY at room temperature (rt),
0°C and −25°C (entries 6, 7 and 8, respectively). As
shown in entry 7, DL-9 was obtained at 0°C in satisfac-
tory yield. The distereomeric ratio of DL-9a and DL-9b
was 79:21.8,9 We also carried out the reaction of the
optically active compound
D
-2Z under the same condi-
tions as entry 7. No epimerization of the C3 position of
either 9a or 9b occurred in this experiment.10
The syntheses of 10 and 11 having alternative protect-
ing groups were also examined under similar conditions
to entry 7. Both were obtained in 80 and 85% yields,
respectively, with similar diastereoselectivity (10a:10b=
11a:11b=79:21). Stereochemistry of the compounds
9–11 was determined by well-known protection/
deprotection procedures to convert them to the known
compounds 12a and 12b.1,11
9. We also carried out the reaction based on entry 7 in the
presence of several Lewis acids such as zinc chloride,
magnesium bromide, triisobutylalminium and tin(II) tri-
flate. However, the diastereoselectivity of 9a was not
optimized. Furthermore, chemical yields were dramati-
cally decreased in some cases.
10. No epimerization was confirmed by HPLC analysis of the
desilylated derivatives (+)-12a and (+)-12b (Daicel OD
chiral column 4.6 mm F×250 mm length, hexane/etha-
nol=15:1, flow rate=0.7 ml/min. (+)-12a: rt=24.7 min,
(−)-12a: rt=30.6 min, (+)-12b: rt=34.3 min, (−)-12b:
rt=31.9 min).
11. To determine the relative stereochemistry of all the com-
pounds, we carried out the following reactions.
9a or 9b12a or 12b (Bu4NF in THF at 0°C for 30 min,
88% yield)
In conclusion, we have synthesized methyl N-protected-
3-amino-2-siloxy-4-phenylbutanoates including opti-
cally active ones in a one-portion manipulation in high
yields with good diastereoselectivity. Further synthetic
studies for biologically active compounds are now in
progress.
References
9a or 9b10a or 10b (Pd(OH)2/H2, Boc2O, in MeOH at
rt for 2 h, 91% yield)
11a or 11b12a or 12b (Bu4NF in THF at 0°C for 30
min, 91% yield)
1. May, B. C. H.; Abell, A. D. Synth. Commun. 1999, 29,
2515–2525.
2. For example: (a) Sakurai, M.; Higashida, S.; Sugano, M.;
Komai, T.; Yagi, R.; Ozawa, Y.; Handa, H.; Nishigaki,
T, Yabe, Y. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 1994, 2, 807–825. (b)
Nagai, M.; Kojima, F.; Nagasawa, H.; Hamada, M.;
Aoyagi, T.; Takeuchi, M. J. Antibiot. 1997, 50, 82–84.
3. Recent examples of masked acyl anions: (a) Satoh, T.;
Onda, K.-I.; Yamakawa, K. Tetrahedron Lett. 1990, 31,
3567–3570. (b) Mizuno, M.; Shioiri, T. Tetrahedron Lett.
1998, 39, 9209–9210. (c) Katritzky, A. R.; Yang, Z.; Lam,
J. N. Synthesis 1990, 666–669. (d) Dondoni, A.; Perrone,
D.; Semola, T. Synthesis 1995, 181–185. (e) Aggarwal, V.
K.; Thomas, A.; Schade, S. Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 16213–
16228.
9a: colorless oil; FT-IR (CHCl3): 3437, 2953, 1753, 1717,
1
1504, 1146, 840 cm−1; H NMR (300 MHz): l 7.40–7.10
(m, 10H), 5.17 (brd, J=8.5 Hz, NH), 5.01 (d, J=12.3
Hz, 1H), 4.97 (d, J=12.3 Hz, 1H), 4.41–4.29 (m, 1H),
4.23 (d, J=1.4 Hz, 1H), 3.64 (s, 3H), 2.87 (d, J=7.5 Hz,
2H), 0.96 (s, 9H), 0.10 (s, 3H), 0.05 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (75
MHz): l 172.2, 155.7, 137.5, 136.5, 129.2, 128.5, 128.5,
128.1, 128.0, 126.6, 72.1, 66.6, 55.5, 52.0, 38.1, 25.8,
18.4, −4.7, −5.3; EI-HRMS calcd for C25H35NO5Si (M+):
457.2285. Found 457.2302.
9b: colorless oil; FT-IR (CHCl3): 3443, 2954, 1753, 1719,
1507, 1254, 1150, 838 cm−1 1H NMR (300 MHz): l
;
7.39–7.10 (m, 10H), 5.03 (s, 2H), 4.86 (brd, J=7.6 Hz,
NH), 4.45 (d, J=3.1 Hz, 1H), 4.50–4.25 (m, 1H), 3.64 (s,
3H), 2.87–2.62 (m, 2H), 0.93 (s, 9H), 0.08 (s, 3H), 0.01 (s,
3H). 13C NMR (75 MHz): l 171.7, 155.6, 137.3, 136.4,
129.4, 128.5, 128.4, 128.1, 128.0, 126.7, 73.3, 66.7, 55.0,
51.8, 35.5, 25.7, 18.3, −5.0, −5.5; EI-HRMS calcd for
C25H35NO5Si (M+): 457.2285. Found 457.2249.
4. ‘-MAC-’ is the abbreviation of ‘-C(CN)2O-’. Nemoto, H.;
Ibaragi, T.; Bando, M.; Kido, M.; Shibuya, M. Tetra-
hedron Lett. 1999, 40, 1319–1322.
5. The aldehydes DL-2Z,
D-2Z, and DL-2B were prepared
according to the available procedure. Fehrentz, J.-A.;
Castro, B. Synthesis 1983, 676–678.
.