Anion Electrochemical Recognition
J. Phys. Chem. B, Vol. 112, No. 35, 2008 11175
-
Figure 7. CV curves of 2 only (A) and 2 with 3 equiv H2PO4 (B) in CH2Cl2 at different scan rates. From inner to outer, the scan rate are 0.14,
0.18, 0.22, 0.26, 0.30 V/s. Supporting electrolyte: 0.1 M Bu4NBF4, [Fe] ) 0.5 mM.
TABLE 2: Kinetic Parameters of Electrode Processes for 2
and 2-H2PO4 in CH2Cl2
us much information of the electrode process in the electro-
chemical anion recognition.
-
peak type
RnR
k0 (cm/s)
Dapp (105 cm2/s)
-
2–H2PO4
Acknowledgment. This work is supported by the National
Nature Science Foundation of China (no. 20572097 and o.
20672097) and Science and Technology Program of Ningbo.
We also thank Prof. R. James Cross at Yale University for the
kind discussions.
reduction peak
oxidation peak
0.718
0.869
1.513
0.619
0.344
0.128
2
reduction peak
oxidation peak
0.432
0.271
8.290
10.176
2.432
3.770
Supporting Information Available: CV curves of 1 after
addition of different anions, UV-vis spectra of 2 to sulfate,
1H NMR spectra, mass spectra, and linear relationship of peak
potential, peak current,and scan rate atr shown. This informa-
tion is available free of charge via the Internet at http://
pubs.acs.org.
in the electrode surface which impeded the electron exchange.
In the sample of 2, RnR of the reduction peak is larger than
that of the oxidation peak, which is in accordance with the
usual cases22-25 because of the relative instability of the
-
oxidation state. However, from the sample of 2-H2PO4
,
-
we discovered that the addition of H2PO4 can stabilize the
oxidation state because of their combination. k0 represents
the time that the redox system needs to reach the balance
and can also reflect the reversibility of the electrode process.
References and Notes
(1) Quinton, P. M. FASEB J. 1990, 4, 2709–2711.
(2) Renkawek, K.; Bosman, M. NeuroReport 1995, 6, 929–932.
(3) Holm, E. Radiochim. Acta 1993, 63, 57–59.
In our two samples, the much lower k0 of 2-H2PO4
-
compared with that of 2 is reflected by the much larger ∆Ep,
because the system with lower k0 needs a larger superpotential
(represented by ∆Ep) to drive.21 The diffusion coefficient Dapp
of the 2-H2PO4 is much lower than that of 2 because of
the binding of anions making the fluidic volume much larger.
(4) Deng, L. B.; Wang, L.; Yu, H. J.; Wang, J. J.; Dong, X. C. J. Appl.
Polym. Sci. 2008, 107, 1539–1546.
(5) Stry, L. Biochemistryl, 4th ed.; W. H. Freeman & Co.: New York,
1988.
(6) Deng, L. B.; Wang, L.; Yu, H. J.; Dong, X. C.; Huo, J. Des.
Monomers Polym. 2007, 10, 131–143.
-
(7) Beer, P. D.; Graydon, A. R.; Johnson, A. O. M.; Smith, D. K. Inorg.
Chem. 1997, 36, 2112–2117.
4. Conclusion
(8) Reynes, O.; Bucher, C.; Moutet, J. C.; Royal, G.; Aman, E. S.;
In conclusion, a new ferrocenyl anion receptor 2 with
specially designed multiple binding sites of amide and
positively charged nitrogen was synthesized. Compared to
its counterpart 1 with just a single binding site of amide, 2
Ungureau, E. M. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2005, 580, 291–296.
(9) Oton, F.; Tarraga, A.; Espinosa, A.; Velasco, M. D.; Bautista, D.;
Molina, P. J. Organomet. Chem. 2005, 70, 6603–6605.
(10) Tan, Q. H.; Wang, L.; Yu, H. J.; Deng, L. B. J. Phy. Chem. B
2007, 111, 3904–3909.
(11) Reynes, O.; Royal, G.; Chainet, E.; Moutet, J. C.; Amana, E. S.
Electrochim. Acta 2003, 15, 65–68.
(12) Reynes, O.; Buche, C.; Moutet, J. C.; Royal, G.; Aman, E. S. Chem.
Commun. 2004, 428–429.
-
showed higher sensitivity to H2PO4 and thus proved the
enhancement effect of the multiple binding sites. The CV
-
and UV-vis responses of 2 to H2PO4 indicated the unique
-
step-by-step binding mode from 1:1 to 1:2 of 2 to H2PO4
,
(13) Fenniri, H.; Lehn, J.; Rigault, A. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.
1996, 35, 337–339.
(14) Quesada, S.; Seel, C.; Prados, P.; Mendoza, J.; Dalcol, I.; Giralt,
-
which differentiates the binding of H2PO4 by 2 compared
to that of HSO4 and Br-. The good performance of 2 in
-
anion recognition indicates a direction in the binding site
E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 277–280.
design of anion receptor.
(15) Reetz, T.; Niemeyer, M.; Harms, K. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.
1991, 30, 1472–1478.
(16) Boiocchi, M.; Fabbrizzik, L.; Piovani, G.; Talietti, A. Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 3847–3851.
(17) Valerio, C.; Fillaut, J. L.; Ruiz, J.; Guittard, J.; Blais, J. C.; Astruc,
D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 2588–2595.
(18) Zhang, S.; Echegoyen, L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 2006–
2011.
(19) Steed, J. W. Chem. Commun. 2006, 2637–2649.
(20) Labande, A.; Ruiz, J.; Astruc, D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124,
1728–1732.
Influences of scan rate on anion binding were also studied.
It was found that at different scan rates, the CV curve of 2
-
with 3 H2PO4 remained stable. The linear relationship of
the peak current with the square root of the scan rate in large
a scan range indicates that the electrode process is diffusion-
controlled. Kinetic parameters of the electrode process such
as the diffusion coefficient Dapp, surface transfer coefficient
RnR, and standard rate constant k0 can be calculated and give