Red u ctive P ET Cyclor ever sion of Oxeta n es: Sin glet Mu ltip licity,
Regioselectivity, a n d Detection of Olefin Ra d ica l An ion
Ra u´ l P e´ rez-Ruiz, M. Angeles Izquierdo, and Miguel A. Miranda*
Departamento de Qu ´ı mica/ Instituto de Tecnolog ı´ a Qu ı´ mica UPV-CSIC, Universidad Polit e´ cnica de
Valencia, Camino de Vera s/ n, Apdo. 22012, 46022 Valencia, Spain
Received J une 24, 2003
Cycloreversion of 2-(p-cyanophenyl)-4-methyl-3-phenyloxetane (1) is achieved using 1-methox-
ynaphthalene (2) as electron-transfer photosensitizer. The experimental results are consistent with
the reaction taking place from the singlet excited state of the sensitizer. Ring splitting of the radical
•
-
anion 1 occurs with cleavage of O-C
2
and C
3
4
-C bonds, leading to products (acetaldehyde and
p-cyanostilbene) different from the reagents used in the Paterno-B u¨ chi synthesis of 1. The olefin
radical anion involved in the electron-transfer process has been detected by means of laser flash
photolysis.
In tr od u ction
etanes. In addition, radical cation intermediates have
been detected by laser flash photolysis (LFP).
During the past few decades, photoinduced electron
transfer (PET) processes have attracted considerable
interest. They have been intensively studied as funda-
Only a few reports have appeared on the CR of oxetane
2
radical anions despite their higher biological interest.
1
12-14
Kim et al.
have pointed out that the repair of the
mental steps in mechanistic and synthetic organic pho-
tochemistry and appear to be involved in key biological
processes.
(
6-4) photoproducts of DNA follows a mechanism analo-
gous to the reductive electron-transfer established for
cyclobutane pyrimidine DNA dimers. Falvey et al.
2
,15-17
Cycloreversion (CR) of oxetanes by PET is important
have proposed that reversal of the (6-4) photoproduct
to the oxetane intermediate is followed by the photo-
chemical step involving transfer of one electron from a
FADH cofactor to the resulting oxetane. The oxetane
radical anion then cleaves to provide two pyrimidine
units (one of them as radical anion).
for the photoenzymatic repair of the (6-4) photoproducts
of the DNA dipyrimidine sites by photolyase.2
-5
The
-
oxidative version of this reaction has been achieved using
cyanoaromatics, chloranil or (thia)pyrylium salts as
electron-transfer photosensitizers.6
-11
In the case of the
To evaluate the proposed mechanism, cycloadducts of
(
thia)pyrylium salts, CR takes place from the triplet
1
,3-dimethylthymine with benzaldehyde and benzophe-
excited state of the photosensitizer and may lead to
products different from the reagents employed in the
Paterno-B u¨ chi photocycloaddition to synthesize the ox-
none have been used as model systems and reacted with
a variety of electron-donor photosensitizers. This has led
to LFP detection of the radical anion of the carbonyl
fragment, a clear proof in support of a PET mechanism.
On the basis of the fact that fluorescence of the photo-
sensitizer is quenched by the oxetanes, it has been
proposed that the reaction takes place from the singlet
excited state of the former.
In connection with the mechanistic aspects of the
reductive PET CR of oxetanes, the following questions
remain still open and deserve further investigations: (i)
the multiplicity of the involved excited state, as the
*
To whom correspondence should be addressed. Phone: 963877340.
Fax: 963879349.
1) (a) Schmittel, M.; Burghart, A. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.
(
1
9
4
997, 36, 2550-2589. (b) M u¨ ller, F.; Mattay, J . Chem. Rev. 1993, 93,
9-117. (c) Kavarnos, G. J .; Turro, N. J . Chem. Rev. 1986, 86, 401-
49. (d) Mattay, J . Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1987, 26, 825-845.
(
2) Prakash, G.; Falvey, D. E. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 1995, 117, 11375-
1
1376.
(3) Wang, Y.; Gaspar, P. P.; Taylor, J . S. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 2000,
1
22, 5510-5519.
(
4) Sancar, A. Chem. Rev. 2003, 42, 6747-6753.
(5) Cichon, M. K.; Arnold, S.; Carell, T. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002,
4
1, 767-770.
6) Nakabayashi, K.; Kojima, J . I.; Tanabe, K.; Yasuda, M.; Shima,
K. Bull. Chem. Soc. J pn. 1989, 62, 96-101.
7) Miranda, M. A.; Izquierdo, M. A.; Galindo, F. Org. Lett. 2001, 3,
965-1967.
8) Miranda, M. A.; Izquierdo, M. A.; Galindo, F. J . Org. Chem. 2002,
7, 4138-4142.
9) Miranda, M. A.; Izquierdo, M. A. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124,
532-6533.
10) Miranda, M. A.; Izquierdo, M. A. Chem. Commun. 2003, 3, 364-
65.
11) Miranda, M. A.; Izquierdo, M. A.; P e´ rez-Ruiz R. J . Phys. Chem.
A 2003, 107, 2478-2482.
(
(12) Kim, S.-T.; Malhotra, K.; Smith, C. A.; Taylor, J . S.; Sancar, A.
J . Biol. Chem. 1994, 269, 8535-8540.
(
(13) Kim, S.-T.; Malhotra, K.; C. A.; Taylor, J . S.; Sancar, A.
Photochem. Photobiol. 1996, 63, 292-295.
1
6
6
3
(
(14) Hitomi, K.; Nakamura, H.; Kim, S.-T.; Mizukoshi, T.; Ishikawa,
T.; Iwai, S.; Todo, T. J . Biol. Chem. 2001, 276, 10103-10109.
(15) J oseph, A.; Prakash, G.; Falvey, D. E. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 2000,
122, 11219-11225.
(16) J oseph, A.; Falvey, D. E. J . Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 3145-
3146.
(
(
(
(17) J oseph, A.; Falvey, D. E. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2002, 1,
632-635.
1
0.1021/jo034890n CCC: $25.00 © 2003 American Chemical Society
Published on Web 12/03/2003
J . Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 10103-10108
10103