ARTICLE IN PRESS
C.R.H. Bahl et al. / Physica B 385–386 (2006) 398–400
400
Here DðꢀÞ is the detailed balance factor, g is the HWHM of
the inelastic peaks and ꢁꢀ0 are the centre positions of these.
Applying this model to the data presented in Fig. 1, the
parameters of the inelastic signal have been determined.
We find values of ꢀ0 ¼ 0:51 ꢁ 0:02 meV and g ¼ 0:42ꢁ
0:09 meV. Although the measurement was performed at
200 K, this is still well below the reported Neel temperature
of 460 K [10]. Assuming the bulk value of the exchange
field, the anisotropy field is calculated from Eq. (1) yielding
a value of HA ¼ 0:0098 ꢁ 0:0008 T.
4. Conclusion
The new seven blade analyser imaging mode of the
RITA-II spectrometer has been used to study non-
dispersive uniform magnetic excitations in disc-shaped
NiO nanoparticles. An estimate of the ‘‘in plane’’
anisotropy field within the nanoparticles is given taking
into account the uncompensated magnetic moment of the
particles.
Although NiO has a similar anisotropy structure to
hematite we do not observe the dramatic increase of
anisotropy in nanoparticles compared to bulk which has
previously been observed in hematite [13]. However, the
‘‘in plane’’ anisotropy of bulk hematite is extremely small
giving HA ꢄ 0:001 T compared to HA ꢄ 0:026 T in hema-
tite nanoparticles of a similar size as the present NiO
particles. We observe comparable values of the ‘‘in plane’’
anisotropy in bulk and nanoscale NiO. This may be due to
the bulk value being larger than in hematite.
However, due to the small size of nanoparticles, there
will be a number of uncompensated spins on one of the
sublattices and thus the particles may be considered as
being weakly ferrimagnetic. This uncompensated moment
in NiO nanoparticles has been observed in numerous
papers, e.g., Ref. [11]. The surplus of spins on one
sublattice will change the precession frequency of the
resonance mode, splitting it into two modes. Assuming
uniaxial anisotropy the energies of these are given by
Ref. [3]
2
References
HE DS
4
_o ¼ gm
ꢁ
2
ꢁ
B
S
[1] C.G. Shull, W.A. Strauser, E.O. Wollan, Phys. Rev. 83 (1951) 333.
[2] S. Mørup, B.R. Hansen, Phys. Rev. B 72 (2005) 24418.
[3] C. Kittel, Phys. Rev. 82 (1951) 565.
3
5
sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
ꢀ
ꢁ
2 þ HEHA
þ ð2HE þ HAÞHA
.
HE DS
DS
S
þ
˚
[4] P.-A. Lindgard, A. Kowalska, P. Laut, J. Phys. Chem. Solids 28
(1967) 1357.
2
S
[5] M.T. Hutchings, E.J. Samuelsen, Phys. Rev. B 6 (1972) 3447.
[6] M.F. Hansen, F. Bødker, S. Mørup, K. Lefmann, K.N. Clausen,
ð3Þ
P.-A. Lindga
M.F. Hansen, F. Bødker, S. Mørup, K. Lefmann, K.N. Clausen,
P.-A. Lindgard, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 221 (2000) 10;
S.N. Klausen, K. Lefmann, P.-A. Lindgard, K.N. Clausen, M.F.
˚
rd, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 (1997) 4910;
Here DS=S is the fraction of uncompensated spins relative
to the number of spins in one sublattice. In a similar sample
of NiO nanoparticles the uncompensated moment has been
measured by high-field Mossbauer spectroscopy and
magnetometry to be 0.6% [12]. Assuming that we are
˚
˚
Hansen, F. Bødker, S. Mørup, M. Telling, J. Magn. Magn. Mater.
266 (2003) 68.
[7] S.N. Klausen, K. Lefmann, P.-A. Lindgard, L. Theil Kuhn,
˚
measuring the mode with the lowest energy, o , Eq. (3)
ꢀ
C.R.H. Bahl, C. Frandsen, S. Mørup, B. Roessli, N. Cavadini,
C. Niedermayer, Phys. Rev. B 70 (2004) 214411.
gives HA ¼ 0:023 T and thus a splitting between the two
modes of Do ¼ o ꢀ o ¼ 0:68 meV. As we do not know
þ
ꢀ
[8] V.V. Pishko, S.L. Gnatcheko, V.V. Tsapenko, R.H. Kodama,
S.A. Makhlouf, J. Appl. Phys. 93 (2003) 7382.
the error on DS=S we cannot calculate the error on HA.
Due to the decrease of scattering cross-section with
increasing energy transfer, it is likely that we observe
[9] C.R.H. Bahl, P. Andersen, S.N. Klausen, K. Lefmann, Nucl. Instr.
and Meth. B 226 (2004) 667;
C.R.H. Bahl, K. Lefmann, A.B. Abrahamsen, H.M. Rønnow,
F. Saxild, T.B.S. Jensen, L. Udby, N.H. Andersen, N.B. Christensen,
H.S. Jakobsen, T. Larsen, P.S. Hafliger, S. Streule, Ch. Niedermayer,
Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B 246 (2006) 452.
the o mode as the o mode is found at a higher energy,
ꢀ
with much less intensity. Furthermore, the tails of the
þ
o
peak may obscure the signal from the o mode as g is
ꢀ
þ
comparable to Do.
˚
[10] S.N. Klausen, P.-A. Lindgard, F. Bødker, S. Mørup, Phys. Stat. Sol.
(A) 189 (2002) 1039.
Assuming the bulk value of the exchange field may be an
overestimate as the many spins at the surface of a particle
will have broken bonds. However, a reasonably smaller
value of the exchange field would only give a slight increase
of the anisotropy field.
[11] J.T. Richardson, D.I. Yiagas, B. Turk, K. Forster, M.V. Twigg,
J. Appl. Phys. 70 (1991) 6977.
[12] C.R.H. Bahl, M.F. Hansen, T. Pedersen, S. Saadi, K.H. Nielsen,
B. Lebech, S. Mørup J. Phys.: Condens. Matter. 18 (2006) 4161.
[13] F. Bødker, S. Mørup, Europhys. Lett. 52 (2000) 217.